ABCDE: From a VC Perspective, Discuss the Recent Changes in the RWA Space

By: blockbeats|2025/03/19 14:45:03
0
Share
copy
Original Title: "Discussing Recent Changes in the RWA Track from a VC Perspective"
Original Author: ABCDE, PANews

Having covered the perspectives of the East and the West on the market last time, today, coinciding with YZi Labs' announcement of investing in the Plume Network RWA platform, I want to discuss the recent changes I have observed in the RWA track.

This matter needs to be broken down into four parts:

1. Whether RWA truly has an application scenario, or in other words, Product-Market Fit (PMF)

2. Which RWA assets are suitable for on-chain implementation and which are not

3. What were the past solutions, and what are the current solutions

4. The direction of the RWA track in recent months—have you noticed any changes?

Let's start with 1 - Whether RWA Truly Has an Application Scenario

Or PMF - (Here, first, let's exclude the stablecoin track of on-chain U.S. bonds; projects like Usual, MKR, etc., are considered to have already found PMF). Taking U.S. stocks on-chain as an example, this is one of the most contentious topics on Twitter. Many people think that putting U.S. stocks on-chain is unnecessary. Those who really want to trade U.S. stocks have their own channels, and any asset on-chain is more volatile than U.S. stocks, so there's no need to play stocks on-chain.

I have a different opinion on this. Personally, I believe there is significance in putting U.S. stocks on-chain.

1. In terms of channels—indeed, most big players above A8 and A9 use platforms like Futu, FirstTrade for securities, diversified investments in coins, stocks, gold, etc. However, I believe that most retail investors in the crypto community do not have U.S. stock accounts. On-chain U.S. stock trading can at least provide them with an easy way to access their purchases.

From another perspective, as the total market cap of stablecoins like USDT/USDC continues to grow, this is another way for the U.S. dollar to expand its dominance compared to traditional finance. If Crypto, through stablecoins, Payfi, and smart wallets with an experience similar to Alipay, really moves towards Mass Adoption one day, do you think Americans would be willing to have the whole world come in to buy U.S. stocks? Would people from most other countries prefer to go through various banks and brokerages for days to buy their own struggling stocks, or simply place orders like shopping on Taobao to invest in the seven sisters of the world's largest economy?

2. In terms of application scenarios, imagine this scenario: as a junior P, you recently made a quick $100k trading Mubarak, you know Tesla has recently taken a hit, presenting a good opportunity for a bargain purchase, and now you want to convert that $100k into Tesla stock.

Even if you have a US stock account, you need to first convert these 100,000 U tokens to fiat currency, send the fiat currency to the broker's account via bank transfer, and then start buying on the broker's platform. This whole process usually takes 3-5 business days. (In 2017, before I got into Bitcoin, I bought US stocks in Australia through FirstTrade. Just the Swift transfer took 4 to 5 days and incurred a hefty fee of several tens of dollars). If one day your Telstra stock goes up and you want to sell it to convert to BTC or U, you'll have to go through this process all over again. Imagine if stocks were on the chain, and you could instantly convert the U you earned from a meme to Tesla. The reduction in friction costs is not just a little bit, but a 10x or even 100x level of experience improvement.

Now, let's talk about 2 - Which RWA Assets are Suitable for On-chain

Similarly, assets like T-Bills that have already proven themselves are not up for discussion. As for other RWA assets, it actually depends on the specific target audience.

For the To C side, stocks are undoubtedly the most suitable. Most retail investors have probably never dealt with primary private equity. Even if you tokenize equity of a non-public company, few people would be able to understand, buy, and hold it. Similarly, assets like private credit collateral on platforms like Centrifuge, such as bridge loans in the real estate market and corporate accounts receivable financing, are not suitable for To C. For the vast majority of To C users, the only familiar asset would be stocks. In more To C scenarios, it should be a process of bringing an asset to users who previously had no channel to purchase it, a 0 to 1 process.

On the other hand, for the To B side, there are many more assets that can be tokenized. However, compared to the 0 to 1 progression for To C, To B is more of a 1 to 100 process of reducing friction. Just as primary private equity is already circulated among some institutions and high-net-worth individuals, bridge loan collaterals on Centrifuge could likely be borrowed from traditional banks. It's just that the current flow process is relatively cumbersome with higher friction. Placing these assets on the chain, like Payfi compared to Swift, can significantly enhance user experience and transaction speed.

Thinking back to last year, I discussed an RWA project where the parent company is a prominent US-based asset management firm. They plan to tokenize primary equity of clients on their asset management platform, such as Musk's SpaceX, and issue it in token form on their own trading platform. This way, the token can easily circulate and change hands, and settle all at once when SpaceX goes public. So, for To B, apart from the trading users limited to institutions and enterprises, the issuing entity is also relatively limited. Just like the example above, unless you already hold a significant amount of SpaceX's equity in your hands through asset management, you're simply an STO or RWA platform. If you want to attract SpaceX equity holders to issue tokens representing SpaceX equity on your platform, it involves various frictions such as resource collaboration, legal terms, and more.

There are still many in-between states that can be To C or To B, such as IP on-chain solutions like Story Protocol, or tokenizing things like royalties for a novel, box office revenue for a movie, or sales of a game. It feels like we are still in the early exploration stage where we need to try out one thing at a time to prove its viability. For example, tokenizing influence had FT fail while Kaito relatively succeeded. Tokenizing celebrity time, such as Time.Fun, gained popularity for a few days before disappearing... These things need to be approached gradually.

Next is 3 - What were the past solutions, and what are the current solutions?

Let's use the example of the US stock market - the past solutions were mainly focused on synthetic assets, represented by SNX, Terra's Mirror, and GNS.

From the current perspective, this path has been mostly debunked, as the three platforms mentioned above had already delisted synthetic US stock assets previously available. There are two main reasons for this. First, the community did not show much interest in holding stablecoins or native tokens (like SNX) that synthetically represent "fake assets." You can see the contrast in volume between BTC, WBTC, and SBTC on SNX to understand this mismatch. Synthetic assets, to be frank, don't provide as much peace of mind as WBTC-like "mapped assets." Second, in the past, the SEC was quick to investigate without needing a solid reason. While synthetic assets may be fake, the SEC's scrutiny is something platforms prefer to avoid. Thus, these platforms swiftly delisted the synthetic US stocks.

Now, with Trump in office and a new SEC chairman, regulatory oversight seems much better than in the previous years. For the new on-chain US stock market, two approaches have been observed.

One follows the traditional compliant Broker Dealer route - when users buy tokenized stocks on-chain, it triggers off-chain compliant brokers to perform equivalent operations in the US stock market. Fundamentally, it's similar to the order flow from Robinhood, where Citadel essentially "buys on behalf" in the stock market. The advantage is that the stocks you buy are "real" stocks, or at least backed 1:1 by this broker, somewhat like WBTC to BTC. However, the drawback is that trading times align with the stock market, so it cannot operate 24x7 like crypto. Additionally, trust in the broker or platform is essential, and selling triggers a Taxation Event, requiring US citizens to submit tax-related forms, while non-US citizens need to undergo KYC procedures, making it somewhat cumbersome.

The second approach is by Ondo Global Market, which, after reviewing their documentation, initially intended to follow the Broker Dealer route but later shifted to a stablecoin-like method. This approach permits their authorized issuers to directly issue tokenized stocks (similar to Tether issuing USDT or Circle issuing USDC). The advantage is greater flexibility, potentially overcoming the restrictions of US stock trading hours, settling through the issuer at a specific time. However, the downside is that it will likely cater mainly to non-US users, excluding US residents. Furthermore, there might be concerns about different issuers issuing the same stock with different CAs (similar to how USDC on different chains is not interoperable), but these specific details were not outlined in the documentation, as the product is slated for next year.

Finally, platforms like Plume that are RWA-based feel more like a Framework, encompassing KYC/AML, data storage/execution, consensus, ZKTLS verification, and more. In theory, this could allow partner institutions to issue various Tokenized RWA assets on this side, which brings us back to the previous topic of "which assets are suitable for on-chain," without going into further detail.

Lastly, let's talk about the trend of RWA in these past few months, have you noticed anything?

If you have been observant, you would realize that the RWA trend has actually picked up pace in the past two months. Here are a few "news" items I casually observed:

1. As mentioned above, the Ondo project plans to launch the Ondo Global Market by the end of this year or next year, an on-chain stock market. Additionally, Ondo has recently been closely associated with Trump's WLFI and has plans for collaboration.

2. Sui has recently been cozying up to WLFI.

3. Frax has actively embraced Cedefi and recently launched frxUSD in collaboration with BlackRock and Superstate.

4. Ethena today released a new product, Converge, which focuses on what they consider to be one of the two most important scenarios on the blockchain - Storage and settlement for stablecoins and tokenized assets.

5. AAVE plans to launch a new coin, Horizen, causing a stir in the community. Stani personally clarified, stating, "The Horizen plan aims to complement Aave's current missing RWA business sector, and this plan is expected to surpass Aave's current business line revenue in 5 years."

6. In February 2025, the Financial Services Commission of Korea released a statement planning to gradually allow corporate entities to engage in virtual asset transactions.

From my circle of friends in Korea, I was informed that Korea may be planning to restart the STO (formerly known as RWA in the last cycle) program. Consider this, allowing "corporate entities to transact virtual assets," this is definitely not for your company to speculate on coins; it is certainly aimed at tokenizing some real-world financial assets into "virtual assets" designed for circulation between companies.

7. YZi Labs officially announced today that they have invested in the recently trending Plume Network RWA platform.

This Momentum formed by these messages cannot be ignored. Therefore, my current personal viewpoint on the main track of the next Circle is PayFI+RWA+Web2.5-like Consumer APP. As for AI+Crypto, all I can say is that there is hope, and I am still discussing and observing. After I finish the next article "Some Notable Things on ETH and Solana," I will write a separate article on my recent thoughts on AI+Crypto as the fourth part to conclude this collection

Original Article Link

You may also like

Token Cannot Compound, Where Is the Real Investment Opportunity?

The next chapter in the crypto industry will undoubtedly be written by Crypto-empowered Stocks.

February 6th Market Key Intelligence, How Much Did You Miss?

1. On-chain Flows: $508.2M USD inflow to Ethereum today; $390.8M USD outflow from Arbitrum 2. Biggest Gainers/Losers: $HBTC, $AIO 3. Top News: Current Bitcoin weekly RSI oversold signal comparable to June 2022

China's Central Bank and Eight Other Departments' Latest Regulatory Focus: Key Attention to RWA Tokenized Asset Risk


Foreword: Today, the People's Bank of China's website published the "Notice of the People's Bank of China, National Development and Reform Commission, Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, Ministry of Public Security, State Administration for Market Regulation, China Banking and Insurance Regulatory Commission, China Securities Regulatory Commission, State Administration of Foreign Exchange on Further Preventing and Dealing with Risks Related to Virtual Currency and Others (Yinfa [2026] No. 42)", the latest regulatory requirements from the eight departments including the central bank, which are basically consistent with the regulatory requirements of recent years. The main focus of the regulation is on speculative activities such as virtual currency trading, exchanges, ICOs, overseas platform services, and this time, regulatory oversight of RWA has been added, explicitly prohibiting RWA tokenization, stablecoins (especially those pegged to the RMB). The following is the full text:


To the people's governments of all provinces, autonomous regions, and municipalities directly under the Central Government, the Xinjiang Production and Construction Corps:


  Recently, there have been speculative activities related to virtual currency and Real-World Assets (RWA) tokenization, disrupting the economic and financial order and jeopardizing the property security of the people. In order to further prevent and address the risks related to virtual currency and Real-World Assets tokenization, effectively safeguard national security and social stability, in accordance with the "Law of the People's Republic of China on the People's Bank of China," "Law of the People's Republic of China on Commercial Banks," "Securities Law of the People's Republic of China," "Law of the People's Republic of China on Securities Investment Funds," "Law of the People's Republic of China on Futures and Derivatives," "Cybersecurity Law of the People's Republic of China," "Regulations of the People's Republic of China on the Administration of Renminbi," "Regulations on Prevention and Disposal of Illegal Fundraising," "Regulations of the People's Republic of China on Foreign Exchange Administration," "Telecommunications Regulations of the People's Republic of China," and other provisions, after reaching consensus with the Cyberspace Administration of China, the Supreme People's Court, and the Supreme People's Procuratorate, and with the approval of the State Council, the relevant matters are notified as follows:


  I. Clarify the essential attributes of virtual currency, Real-World Assets tokenization, and related business activities


  (I) Virtual currency does not possess the legal status equivalent to fiat currency. Virtual currencies such as Bitcoin, Ether, Tether, etc., have the main characteristics of being issued by non-monetary authorities, using encryption technology and distributed ledger or similar technology, existing in digital form, etc. They do not have legal tender status, should not and cannot be circulated and used as currency in the market.


  The business activities related to virtual currency are classified as illegal financial activities. The exchange of fiat currency and virtual currency within the territory, exchange of virtual currencies, acting as a central counterparty in buying and selling virtual currencies, providing information intermediary and pricing services for virtual currency transactions, token issuance financing, and trading of virtual currency-related financial products, etc., fall under illegal financial activities, such as suspected illegal issuance of token vouchers, unauthorized public issuance of securities, illegal operation of securities and futures business, illegal fundraising, etc., are strictly prohibited across the board and resolutely banned in accordance with the law. Overseas entities and individuals are not allowed to provide virtual currency-related services to domestic entities in any form.


  A stablecoin pegged to a fiat currency indirectly fulfills some functions of the fiat currency in circulation. Without the consent of relevant authorities in accordance with the law and regulations, any domestic or foreign entity or individual is not allowed to issue a RMB-pegged stablecoin overseas.


(II)Tokenization of Real-World Assets refers to the use of encryption technology and distributed ledger or similar technologies to transform ownership rights, income rights, etc., of assets into tokens (tokens) or other interests or bond certificates with token (token) characteristics, and carry out issuance and trading activities.


  Engaging in the tokenization of real-world assets domestically, as well as providing related intermediary, information technology services, etc., which are suspected of illegal issuance of token vouchers, unauthorized public offering of securities, illegal operation of securities and futures business, illegal fundraising, and other illegal financial activities, shall be prohibited; except for relevant business activities carried out with the approval of the competent authorities in accordance with the law and regulations and relying on specific financial infrastructures. Overseas entities and individuals are not allowed to illegally provide services related to the tokenization of real-world assets to domestic entities in any form.


  II. Sound Work Mechanism


  (III) Inter-agency Coordination. The People's Bank of China, together with the National Development and Reform Commission, the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, the Ministry of Public Security, the State Administration for Market Regulation, the China Banking and Insurance Regulatory Commission, the China Securities Regulatory Commission, the State Administration of Foreign Exchange, and other departments, will improve the work mechanism, strengthen coordination with the Cyberspace Administration of China, the Supreme People's Court, and the Supreme People's Procuratorate, coordinate efforts, and overall guide regions to carry out risk prevention and disposal of virtual currency-related illegal financial activities.


  The China Securities Regulatory Commission, together with the National Development and Reform Commission, the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, the Ministry of Public Security, the People's Bank of China, the State Administration for Market Regulation, the China Banking and Insurance Regulatory Commission, the State Administration of Foreign Exchange, and other departments, will improve the work mechanism, strengthen coordination with the Cyberspace Administration of China, the Supreme People's Court, and the Supreme People's Procuratorate, coordinate efforts, and overall guide regions to carry out risk prevention and disposal of illegal financial activities related to the tokenization of real-world assets.


  (IV) Strengthening Local Implementation. The people's governments at the provincial level are overall responsible for the prevention and disposal of risks related to virtual currencies and the tokenization of real-world assets in their respective administrative regions. The specific leading department is the local financial regulatory department, with participation from branches and dispatched institutions of the State Council's financial regulatory department, telecommunications regulators, public security, market supervision, and other departments, in coordination with cyberspace departments, courts, and procuratorates, to improve the normalization of the work mechanism, effectively connect with the relevant work mechanisms of central departments, form a cooperative and coordinated working pattern between central and local governments, effectively prevent and properly handle risks related to virtual currencies and the tokenization of real-world assets, and maintain economic and financial order and social stability.


  III. Strengthened Risk Monitoring, Prevention, and Disposal


  (5) Enhanced Risk Monitoring. The People's Bank of China, China Securities Regulatory Commission, National Development and Reform Commission, Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, Ministry of Public Security, State Administration of Foreign Exchange, Cyberspace Administration of China, and other departments continue to improve monitoring techniques and system support, enhance cross-departmental data analysis and sharing, establish sound information sharing and cross-validation mechanisms, promptly grasp the risk situation of activities related to virtual currency and real-world asset tokenization. Local governments at all levels give full play to the role of local monitoring and early warning mechanisms. Local financial regulatory authorities, together with branches and agencies of the State Council's financial regulatory authorities, as well as departments of cyberspace and public security, ensure effective connection between online monitoring, offline investigation, and fund tracking, efficiently and accurately identify activities related to virtual currency and real-world asset tokenization, promptly share risk information, improve early warning information dissemination, verification, and rapid response mechanisms.


  (6) Strengthened Oversight of Financial Institutions, Intermediaries, and Technology Service Providers. Financial institutions (including non-bank payment institutions) are prohibited from providing account opening, fund transfer, and clearing services for virtual currency-related business activities, issuing and selling financial products related to virtual currency, including virtual currency and related financial products in the scope of collateral, conducting insurance business related to virtual currency, or including virtual currency in the scope of insurance liability. Financial institutions (including non-bank payment institutions) are prohibited from providing custody, clearing, and settlement services for unauthorized real-world asset tokenization-related business and related financial products. Relevant intermediary institutions and information technology service providers are prohibited from providing intermediary, technical, or other services for unauthorized real-world asset tokenization-related businesses and related financial products.


  (7) Enhanced Management of Internet Information Content and Access. Internet enterprises are prohibited from providing online business venues, commercial displays, marketing, advertising, or paid traffic diversion services for virtual currency and real-world asset tokenization-related business activities. Upon discovering clues of illegal activities, they should promptly report to relevant departments and provide technical support and assistance for related investigations and inquiries. Based on the clues transferred by the financial regulatory authorities, the cyberspace administration, telecommunications authorities, and public security departments should promptly close and deal with websites, mobile applications (including mini-programs), and public accounts engaged in virtual currency and real-world asset tokenization-related business activities in accordance with the law.


  (8) Strengthened Entity Registration and Advertisement Management. Market supervision departments strengthen entity registration and management, and enterprise and individual business registrations must not contain terms such as "virtual currency," "virtual asset," "cryptocurrency," "crypto asset," "stablecoin," "real-world asset tokenization," or "RWA" in their names or business scopes. Market supervision departments, together with financial regulatory authorities, legally enhance the supervision of advertisements related to virtual currency and real-world asset tokenization, promptly investigating and handling relevant illegal advertisements.


  (IX) Continued Rectification of Virtual Currency Mining Activities. The National Development and Reform Commission, together with relevant departments, strictly controls virtual currency mining activities, continuously promotes the rectification of virtual currency mining activities. The people's governments of various provinces take overall responsibility for the rectification of "mining" within their respective administrative regions. In accordance with the requirements of the National Development and Reform Commission and other departments in the "Notice on the Rectification of Virtual Currency Mining Activities" (NDRC Energy-saving Building [2021] No. 1283) and the provisions of the "Guidance Catalog for Industrial Structure Adjustment (2024 Edition)," a comprehensive review, investigation, and closure of existing virtual currency mining projects are conducted, new mining projects are strictly prohibited, and mining machine production enterprises are strictly prohibited from providing mining machine sales and other services within the country.


  (X) Severe Crackdown on Related Illegal Financial Activities. Upon discovering clues to illegal financial activities related to virtual currency and the tokenization of real-world assets, local financial regulatory authorities, branches of the State Council's financial regulatory authorities, and other relevant departments promptly investigate, determine, and properly handle the issues in accordance with the law, and seriously hold the relevant entities and individuals legally responsible. Those suspected of crimes are transferred to the judicial authorities for processing according to the law.


 (XI) Severe Crackdown on Related Illegal and Criminal Activities. The Ministry of Public Security, the People's Bank of China, the State Administration for Market Regulation, the China Banking and Insurance Regulatory Commission, the China Securities Regulatory Commission, as well as judicial and procuratorial organs, in accordance with their respective responsibilities, rigorously crack down on illegal and criminal activities related to virtual currency, the tokenization of real-world assets, such as fraud, money laundering, illegal business operations, pyramid schemes, illegal fundraising, and other illegal and criminal activities carried out under the guise of virtual currency, the tokenization of real-world assets, etc.


  (XII) Strengthen Industry Self-discipline. Relevant industry associations should enhance membership management and policy advocacy, based on their own responsibilities, advocate and urge member units to resist illegal financial activities related to virtual currency and the tokenization of real-world assets. Member units that violate regulatory policies and industry self-discipline rules are to be disciplined in accordance with relevant self-regulatory management regulations. By leveraging various industry infrastructure, conduct risk monitoring related to virtual currency, the tokenization of real-world assets, and promptly transfer issue clues to relevant departments.


  IV. Strict Supervision of Domestic Entities Engaging in Overseas Business Activities


(XIII) Without the approval of relevant departments in accordance with the law and regulations, domestic entities and foreign entities controlled by them may not issue virtual currency overseas.


  (XIV) Domestic entities engaging directly or indirectly in overseas external debt-based tokenization of real-world assets, or conducting asset securitization activities abroad based on domestic ownership rights, income rights, etc. (hereinafter referred to as domestic equity), should be strictly regulated in accordance with the principles of "same business, same risk, same rules." The National Development and Reform Commission, the China Securities Regulatory Commission, the State Administration of Foreign Exchange, and other relevant departments regulate it according to their respective responsibilities. For other forms of overseas real-world asset tokenization activities based on domestic equity by domestic entities, the China Securities Regulatory Commission, together with relevant departments, supervise according to their division of responsibilities. Without the consent and filing of relevant departments, no unit or individual may engage in the above-mentioned business.


  (15) Overseas subsidiaries and branches of domestic financial institutions providing Real World Asset Tokenization-related services overseas shall do so legally and prudently. They shall have professional personnel and systems in place to effectively mitigate business risks, strictly implement customer onboarding, suitability management, anti-money laundering requirements, and incorporate them into the domestic financial institutions' compliance and risk management system. Intermediaries and information technology service providers offering Real World Asset Tokenization services abroad based on domestic equity or conducting Real World Asset Tokenization business in the form of overseas debt for domestic entities directly or indirectly venturing abroad must strictly comply with relevant laws and regulations. They should establish and improve relevant compliance and internal control systems in accordance with relevant normative requirements, strengthen business and risk control, and report the business developments to the relevant regulatory authorities for approval or filing.


  V. Strengthen Organizational Implementation


  (16) Strengthen organizational leadership and overall coordination. All departments and regions should attach great importance to the prevention of risks related to virtual currencies and Real World Asset Tokenization, strengthen organizational leadership, clarify work responsibilities, form a long-term effective working mechanism with centralized coordination, local implementation, and shared responsibilities, maintain high pressure, dynamically monitor risks, effectively prevent and mitigate risks in an orderly and efficient manner, legally protect the property security of the people, and make every effort to maintain economic and financial order and social stability.


  (17) Widely carry out publicity and education. All departments, regions, and industry associations should make full use of various media and other communication channels to disseminate information through legal and policy interpretation, analysis of typical cases, and education on investment risks, etc. They should promote the illegality and harm of virtual currencies and Real World Asset Tokenization-related businesses and their manifestations, fully alert to potential risks and hidden dangers, and enhance public awareness and identification capabilities for risk prevention.


  VI. Legal Responsibility


  (18) Engaging in illegal financial activities related to virtual currencies and Real World Asset Tokenization in violation of this notice, as well as providing services for virtual currencies and Real World Asset Tokenization-related businesses, shall be punished in accordance with relevant regulations. If it constitutes a crime, criminal liability shall be pursued according to the law. For domestic entities and individuals who knowingly or should have known that overseas entities illegally provided virtual currency or Real World Asset Tokenization-related services to domestic entities and still assisted them, relevant responsibilities shall be pursued according to the law. If it constitutes a crime, criminal liability shall be pursued according to the law.


  (19) If any unit or individual invests in virtual currencies, Real World Asset Tokens, and related financial products against public order and good customs, the relevant civil legal actions shall be invalid, and any resulting losses shall be borne by them. If there are suspicions of disrupting financial order and jeopardizing financial security, the relevant departments shall deal with them according to the law.


  This notice shall enter into force upon the date of its issuance. The People's Bank of China and ten other departments' "Notice on Further Preventing and Dealing with the Risks of Virtual Currency Trading Speculation" (Yinfa [2021] No. 237) is hereby repealed.


Former Partner's Perspective on Multicoin: Kyle's Exit, But the Game He Left Behind Just Getting Started

Kyle knew his game, so he decided to focus on playing the game he was good at and interested in.

Why Bitcoin Is Falling Now: The Real Reasons Behind BTC's Crash & WEEX's Smart Profit Playbook

Bitcoin's ongoing crash explained: Discover the 5 hidden triggers behind BTC's plunge & how WEEX's Auto Earn and Trade to Earn strategies help traders profit from crypto market volatility.

Wall Street's Hottest Trades See Exodus

This time there is no single triggering factor, but rather market anxiety about asset valuation, with many already skeptical of these valuations being too high, leading to investors choosing to retreat almost simultaneously.

Popular coins

Latest Crypto News

Read more