Bitcoin getting ‘stable’? 2025 volatility lower than Nvidia

By: blockbeats|2026/01/05 19:00:02
0
Share
copy
Original Title: Bitcoin is now less volatile than Nvidia, a statistical anomaly that completely changes your risk calculation
Original Author: Gino Matos, CryptoSlate
Original Translation: Saoirse, Foresight News

As Bitcoin closed out 2025, its actual daily volatility dropped to 2.24%, marking the lowest annual figure recorded for the asset.

K33 Research's volatility chart dates back to 2012 when Bitcoin's daily volatility was at 7.58%. The data reveals that in each subsequent cycle, Bitcoin's volatility has been steadily decreasing: 3.34% in 2022, 2.80% in 2024, and down to 2.24% in 2025.

However, there is a discrepancy between market perception and data. In October 2025, Bitcoin's price plummeted from $126,000 to $80,500, causing anxiety. On October 10, a liquidation event triggered by tariff policies wiped out $19 billion of leveraged long positions in a single day.

The paradox lies in this: while Bitcoin's volatility has indeed decreased by traditional standards, the inflows it attracts are larger compared to previous cycles, and the absolute price swings are higher.

Low volatility does not mean a "quiet market" but rather indicates that the market has matured enough to handle institutional-sized capital flows without relapsing into the "chain reaction" feedback loops seen in earlier cycles.

Today, ETFs, corporate treasuries, and regulated custodial institutions have become the "ballast" of market liquidity, with long-term hodlers continuously reallocating assets into this infrastructure.

The end result is that Bitcoin's daily returns are more stable, but market cap fluctuations still reach hundreds of billions of dollars — a level of volatility that would have caused an 80% collapse if seen in 2018 or 2021.

Bitcoin getting ‘stable’? 2025 volatility lower than Nvidia

According to K33 Research data, Bitcoin's annual volatility has dropped from a peak of 7.58% in 2013 to a historic low of 2.24% in 2025.

Continued Decrease in Volatility

The annual volatility data for K33 has documented this transition process.

In 2013, the Bitcoin daily return rate had an average of 7.58%, reflecting a market characterized by thin order books and speculative frenzy. By 2017, this value had decreased to 4.81%; in 2020, it was 3.98%; during the 2021 pandemic bull market, it saw a slight increase to 4.13%. In 2022, with the collapse of the Luna project, Three Arrows Capital, and the FTX trading platform, the volatility surged to 3.34%.

Subsequently, the volatility continued to decline: it was 2.94% in 2023, 2.80% in 2024, and dropped to 2.24% in 2025.

A logarithmic scale price chart further confirms this trend. From 2022 to 2025, Bitcoin did not experience extreme price swings of "rapid surge followed by a steep decline" but rather steadily rose within an upward channel.

While there were pullbacks during this period—for example, the price fell below $50,000 in August 2024 and dropped to $80,500 in October 2025—there was no scenario of a "parabolic surge followed by a systemic collapse."

Analysis indicates that the approximately 36% decline in October 2025 still falls within the normal range of Bitcoin's historical retracements. The difference is that a 36% retracement in the past often occurred at the end of a high-volatility period around 7%, whereas this time, it occurred in a low-volatility environment of 2.2%.

This has led to a "perceptual gap": a 36% decline in six weeks may still feel drastic, but compared to earlier cycles (when daily 10% fluctuations were normal), the volatility in 2025 is relatively mild.

Asset management firm Bitwise points out that Bitcoin's actual volatility is now lower than that of Nvidia, a change that has shifted Bitcoin's positioning from a "pure speculative tool" to a "high-beta macro asset."

The logarithmic price chart of Bitcoin shows that since 2022, its price has been slowly rising within an upward channel, avoiding the parabolic surges and 80% crashes seen in earlier cycles.

Market Cap Expansion, Institutional Entry, and Asset Reallocation

K33's core viewpoint is that the actual decrease in volatility is not due to reduced capital inflows but because a much larger capital base is now needed to drive price changes.

The "Bitcoin Market Cap Three-Month Change Chart" produced by the institution shows that even during a low volatility period, the market cap can still fluctuate by billions of dollars.

During the retracement from October to November 2025, Bitcoin's market cap plummeted by around $570 billion, nearly on par with the retracement of $56.8 billion in July 2021.

The magnitude of the fluctuations has not changed; what has changed is the market's ability to absorb these fluctuations, known as "depth."

In November 2025, Bitcoin's market cap fluctuation over three months reached $570 billion. Despite lower volatility, this drop was comparable to the $56.8 billion drop in July 2021.

Three major structural factors have driven the decrease in volatility:

First is the "buying the dip" effect of ETFs and institutions. K33 statistics show that in 2025, ETFs net purchased around 160,000 bitcoins (lower than the 630,000+ bitcoins in 2024 but still significant). ETFs and corporate treasuries collectively increased their holdings by about 650,000 bitcoins, accounting for over 3% of the circulating supply. These funds entered the market through "programmatic rebalancing" rather than being driven by retail FOMO emotions.

K33 specifically notes that even with a price drop of around 30%, ETF holdings only decreased by single-digit percentages, without experiencing panic redemptions or forced liquidations.

Second is corporate treasuries and structural issuance. By the end of 2025, corporate treasuries collectively held around 473,000 bitcoins (with the pace of accumulation slowing in the second half of the year). The new demand mainly came from preferred stock and convertible bond issuances rather than direct cash purchases—financial teams execute capital structure strategies quarterly rather than chasing short-term market trends like traders.

Third is the redistribution of assets from early holders to a wider audience. K33's "Asset Holding Duration Analysis" shows that since early 2023, bitcoins held idle for over two years have begun to steadily "activate," with around 1.6 million long-held bitcoins entering circulation over the past two years.

2024 and 2025 were the two years with the largest scale of "dormant asset" activations. The report mentions that in July 2025, Galaxy Digital sold 80,000 bitcoins, and Fidelity sold 20,400 bitcoins.

This selloff neatly aligns with the "structural demand" from ETFs, corporate treasuries, and regulated custodians — the latter will gradually accumulate positions over a period of months.

This redistribution is crucial: early adopters accumulated Bitcoin at prices ranging from $100 to $10,000, with the asset mostly concentrated in a few wallets; when they sell, the asset flows to ETF shareholders, corporate balance sheets, and high-net-worth clients who enter through diversified portfolio small buys.

The end result is: Bitcoin ownership concentration decreases, order book depth increases, and the "feedback loop" weakens. In early cycles, a selloff of 10,000 Bitcoin could cause a price drop of 5% to 10% if faced with a illiquid market, triggering stop-losses and liquidations; but by 2025, such selloffs will attract buying interest from multiple institutional channels, potentially even driving a 2% to 3% price increase, weakening the feedback loop, and reducing daily volatility.

Portfolio Construction, Leverage Impact, and the End of the "Parabolic Cycle"

The actual volatility decline has altered institutions' calculation logic for "Bitcoin holding size."

Modern portfolio theory argues that asset allocation weights should be based on "risk contribution" rather than "return potential." With a 4% Bitcoin allocation: if the daily volatility is 7%, its contribution to the portfolio risk is much higher than in a 2.2% volatility scenario.

This mathematical fact forces asset allocators to make a choice: either increase the Bitcoin allocation or use options and structured products (assuming the underlying asset has smoother volatility).

K33's cross-asset performance table shows that in 2025, Bitcoin ranks near the bottom in asset return rankings—although it had outperformed for many years in the previous cycles, in 2025, it lagged behind gold and stocks.

Bitcoin ranks near the bottom in asset performance in 2025, with a decline of 3.8%; in this atypical year for Bitcoin, its performance lags behind gold and stocks.

This "underperformance" coupled with low volatility shifts Bitcoin's positioning from a "speculative satellite asset" to a "core macro asset" — with risk similar to stocks, but driven by factors unrelated to other assets' returns.

The options market also reflects this shift: the implied volatility of Bitcoin options has synchronously decreased with actual volatility, reducing hedging costs and making synthetic structured products more attractive.

Previously, compliance departments often used "high volatility" as a reason to restrict financial advisor allocation to Bitcoin; now, advisors have quantitative evidence: by 2025, Bitcoin's volatility is lower than Nvidia's, lower than many tech stocks, and comparable to high-beta stock sectors.

This has opened up new investment channels for Bitcoin: inclusion in 401(k) retirement plans, Registered Investment Advisor (RIA) allocations, and insurance company investment portfolios subject to strict volatility constraints.

K33's forward-looking data predicts that as these channels open up, ETF net inflows in 2026 will surpass those in 2025, forming a "self-reinforcing cycle": more institutional funds flow in → reduced volatility → unlocking more institutional mandates → more funds flow in.

However, the market's "calm" is conditional. K33's derivative analysis shows that throughout 2025, Bitcoin perpetual futures open interest steadily rose in a "low volatility, strong uptrend" environment, eventually leading to a liquidation event on October 10th - wiping out $19 billion in leveraged longs in a single day.

This sell-off was related to President Trump's tariff statement and widespread "risk-off sentiment," but the core mechanism remains a derivative issue: excessive leveraged longs, thin weekend liquidity, cascading margin calls.

Even with an actual annualized volatility of 2.2%, there may still be "extreme volatility days triggered by leveraged liquidations" hidden. The difference is that these events are now resolved in a matter of hours, not weeks; and with ETF and corporate treasury spot demand providing a "price floor," the market can quickly recover.

The structural backdrop of 2026 supports the view of "maintaining low volatility or further decline": K33 expects that as the two-year Bitcoin supply stabilizes, early holders' sell-offs will decrease; furthermore, there are positive signals at the regulatory level - the U.S. "CLARITY Act," full implementation of Europe's MiCA, and JPMorgan Chase and Bank of America opening up 401(k) and wealth management channels.

K33's "Golden Opportunity" data forecast predicts that in 2026, Bitcoin will outperform stock indices and gold - due to the impact of regulatory breakthroughs and new fund inflows, surpassing the selling pressure from existing holders.

Whether this prediction will materialize is still uncertain, but the mechanisms driving the forecast - deepening liquidity, improving institutional infrastructure, and clear regulation - indeed provide support for low volatility.

Ultimately, the Bitcoin market will move away from the "speculative frontier" attributes of 2013 or 2017, closer to a "high liquidity, institutionally anchored macro asset."

This doesn't mean Bitcoin has become "boring" (e.g., low returns or lack of narrative), but rather that the "game has changed": the price path is more stable, the options market and ETF flows matter more than retail sentiment, and the market's core shifts are reflected in structure, leverage levels, and counterparty composition.

By 2025, despite Bitcoin undergoing the largest regulatory and structural transformation in history, from a volatility perspective, it has become an "institutionalized stable asset."

The value of understanding this shift is that low realized volatility is not a signal of "asset lethargy" but a sign that the "market is mature enough to handle institutional capital without collapsing."

The cycle is not over; it's just that the "cost" of driving market volatility has become higher.

Original Article Link

You may also like

Token Cannot Compound, Where Is the Real Investment Opportunity?

The next chapter in the crypto industry will undoubtedly be written by Crypto-empowered Stocks.

February 6th Market Key Intelligence, How Much Did You Miss?

1. On-chain Flows: $508.2M USD inflow to Ethereum today; $390.8M USD outflow from Arbitrum 2. Biggest Gainers/Losers: $HBTC, $AIO 3. Top News: Current Bitcoin weekly RSI oversold signal comparable to June 2022

China's Central Bank and Eight Other Departments' Latest Regulatory Focus: Key Attention to RWA Tokenized Asset Risk


Foreword: Today, the People's Bank of China's website published the "Notice of the People's Bank of China, National Development and Reform Commission, Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, Ministry of Public Security, State Administration for Market Regulation, China Banking and Insurance Regulatory Commission, China Securities Regulatory Commission, State Administration of Foreign Exchange on Further Preventing and Dealing with Risks Related to Virtual Currency and Others (Yinfa [2026] No. 42)", the latest regulatory requirements from the eight departments including the central bank, which are basically consistent with the regulatory requirements of recent years. The main focus of the regulation is on speculative activities such as virtual currency trading, exchanges, ICOs, overseas platform services, and this time, regulatory oversight of RWA has been added, explicitly prohibiting RWA tokenization, stablecoins (especially those pegged to the RMB). The following is the full text:


To the people's governments of all provinces, autonomous regions, and municipalities directly under the Central Government, the Xinjiang Production and Construction Corps:


  Recently, there have been speculative activities related to virtual currency and Real-World Assets (RWA) tokenization, disrupting the economic and financial order and jeopardizing the property security of the people. In order to further prevent and address the risks related to virtual currency and Real-World Assets tokenization, effectively safeguard national security and social stability, in accordance with the "Law of the People's Republic of China on the People's Bank of China," "Law of the People's Republic of China on Commercial Banks," "Securities Law of the People's Republic of China," "Law of the People's Republic of China on Securities Investment Funds," "Law of the People's Republic of China on Futures and Derivatives," "Cybersecurity Law of the People's Republic of China," "Regulations of the People's Republic of China on the Administration of Renminbi," "Regulations on Prevention and Disposal of Illegal Fundraising," "Regulations of the People's Republic of China on Foreign Exchange Administration," "Telecommunications Regulations of the People's Republic of China," and other provisions, after reaching consensus with the Cyberspace Administration of China, the Supreme People's Court, and the Supreme People's Procuratorate, and with the approval of the State Council, the relevant matters are notified as follows:


  I. Clarify the essential attributes of virtual currency, Real-World Assets tokenization, and related business activities


  (I) Virtual currency does not possess the legal status equivalent to fiat currency. Virtual currencies such as Bitcoin, Ether, Tether, etc., have the main characteristics of being issued by non-monetary authorities, using encryption technology and distributed ledger or similar technology, existing in digital form, etc. They do not have legal tender status, should not and cannot be circulated and used as currency in the market.


  The business activities related to virtual currency are classified as illegal financial activities. The exchange of fiat currency and virtual currency within the territory, exchange of virtual currencies, acting as a central counterparty in buying and selling virtual currencies, providing information intermediary and pricing services for virtual currency transactions, token issuance financing, and trading of virtual currency-related financial products, etc., fall under illegal financial activities, such as suspected illegal issuance of token vouchers, unauthorized public issuance of securities, illegal operation of securities and futures business, illegal fundraising, etc., are strictly prohibited across the board and resolutely banned in accordance with the law. Overseas entities and individuals are not allowed to provide virtual currency-related services to domestic entities in any form.


  A stablecoin pegged to a fiat currency indirectly fulfills some functions of the fiat currency in circulation. Without the consent of relevant authorities in accordance with the law and regulations, any domestic or foreign entity or individual is not allowed to issue a RMB-pegged stablecoin overseas.


(II)Tokenization of Real-World Assets refers to the use of encryption technology and distributed ledger or similar technologies to transform ownership rights, income rights, etc., of assets into tokens (tokens) or other interests or bond certificates with token (token) characteristics, and carry out issuance and trading activities.


  Engaging in the tokenization of real-world assets domestically, as well as providing related intermediary, information technology services, etc., which are suspected of illegal issuance of token vouchers, unauthorized public offering of securities, illegal operation of securities and futures business, illegal fundraising, and other illegal financial activities, shall be prohibited; except for relevant business activities carried out with the approval of the competent authorities in accordance with the law and regulations and relying on specific financial infrastructures. Overseas entities and individuals are not allowed to illegally provide services related to the tokenization of real-world assets to domestic entities in any form.


  II. Sound Work Mechanism


  (III) Inter-agency Coordination. The People's Bank of China, together with the National Development and Reform Commission, the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, the Ministry of Public Security, the State Administration for Market Regulation, the China Banking and Insurance Regulatory Commission, the China Securities Regulatory Commission, the State Administration of Foreign Exchange, and other departments, will improve the work mechanism, strengthen coordination with the Cyberspace Administration of China, the Supreme People's Court, and the Supreme People's Procuratorate, coordinate efforts, and overall guide regions to carry out risk prevention and disposal of virtual currency-related illegal financial activities.


  The China Securities Regulatory Commission, together with the National Development and Reform Commission, the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, the Ministry of Public Security, the People's Bank of China, the State Administration for Market Regulation, the China Banking and Insurance Regulatory Commission, the State Administration of Foreign Exchange, and other departments, will improve the work mechanism, strengthen coordination with the Cyberspace Administration of China, the Supreme People's Court, and the Supreme People's Procuratorate, coordinate efforts, and overall guide regions to carry out risk prevention and disposal of illegal financial activities related to the tokenization of real-world assets.


  (IV) Strengthening Local Implementation. The people's governments at the provincial level are overall responsible for the prevention and disposal of risks related to virtual currencies and the tokenization of real-world assets in their respective administrative regions. The specific leading department is the local financial regulatory department, with participation from branches and dispatched institutions of the State Council's financial regulatory department, telecommunications regulators, public security, market supervision, and other departments, in coordination with cyberspace departments, courts, and procuratorates, to improve the normalization of the work mechanism, effectively connect with the relevant work mechanisms of central departments, form a cooperative and coordinated working pattern between central and local governments, effectively prevent and properly handle risks related to virtual currencies and the tokenization of real-world assets, and maintain economic and financial order and social stability.


  III. Strengthened Risk Monitoring, Prevention, and Disposal


  (5) Enhanced Risk Monitoring. The People's Bank of China, China Securities Regulatory Commission, National Development and Reform Commission, Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, Ministry of Public Security, State Administration of Foreign Exchange, Cyberspace Administration of China, and other departments continue to improve monitoring techniques and system support, enhance cross-departmental data analysis and sharing, establish sound information sharing and cross-validation mechanisms, promptly grasp the risk situation of activities related to virtual currency and real-world asset tokenization. Local governments at all levels give full play to the role of local monitoring and early warning mechanisms. Local financial regulatory authorities, together with branches and agencies of the State Council's financial regulatory authorities, as well as departments of cyberspace and public security, ensure effective connection between online monitoring, offline investigation, and fund tracking, efficiently and accurately identify activities related to virtual currency and real-world asset tokenization, promptly share risk information, improve early warning information dissemination, verification, and rapid response mechanisms.


  (6) Strengthened Oversight of Financial Institutions, Intermediaries, and Technology Service Providers. Financial institutions (including non-bank payment institutions) are prohibited from providing account opening, fund transfer, and clearing services for virtual currency-related business activities, issuing and selling financial products related to virtual currency, including virtual currency and related financial products in the scope of collateral, conducting insurance business related to virtual currency, or including virtual currency in the scope of insurance liability. Financial institutions (including non-bank payment institutions) are prohibited from providing custody, clearing, and settlement services for unauthorized real-world asset tokenization-related business and related financial products. Relevant intermediary institutions and information technology service providers are prohibited from providing intermediary, technical, or other services for unauthorized real-world asset tokenization-related businesses and related financial products.


  (7) Enhanced Management of Internet Information Content and Access. Internet enterprises are prohibited from providing online business venues, commercial displays, marketing, advertising, or paid traffic diversion services for virtual currency and real-world asset tokenization-related business activities. Upon discovering clues of illegal activities, they should promptly report to relevant departments and provide technical support and assistance for related investigations and inquiries. Based on the clues transferred by the financial regulatory authorities, the cyberspace administration, telecommunications authorities, and public security departments should promptly close and deal with websites, mobile applications (including mini-programs), and public accounts engaged in virtual currency and real-world asset tokenization-related business activities in accordance with the law.


  (8) Strengthened Entity Registration and Advertisement Management. Market supervision departments strengthen entity registration and management, and enterprise and individual business registrations must not contain terms such as "virtual currency," "virtual asset," "cryptocurrency," "crypto asset," "stablecoin," "real-world asset tokenization," or "RWA" in their names or business scopes. Market supervision departments, together with financial regulatory authorities, legally enhance the supervision of advertisements related to virtual currency and real-world asset tokenization, promptly investigating and handling relevant illegal advertisements.


  (IX) Continued Rectification of Virtual Currency Mining Activities. The National Development and Reform Commission, together with relevant departments, strictly controls virtual currency mining activities, continuously promotes the rectification of virtual currency mining activities. The people's governments of various provinces take overall responsibility for the rectification of "mining" within their respective administrative regions. In accordance with the requirements of the National Development and Reform Commission and other departments in the "Notice on the Rectification of Virtual Currency Mining Activities" (NDRC Energy-saving Building [2021] No. 1283) and the provisions of the "Guidance Catalog for Industrial Structure Adjustment (2024 Edition)," a comprehensive review, investigation, and closure of existing virtual currency mining projects are conducted, new mining projects are strictly prohibited, and mining machine production enterprises are strictly prohibited from providing mining machine sales and other services within the country.


  (X) Severe Crackdown on Related Illegal Financial Activities. Upon discovering clues to illegal financial activities related to virtual currency and the tokenization of real-world assets, local financial regulatory authorities, branches of the State Council's financial regulatory authorities, and other relevant departments promptly investigate, determine, and properly handle the issues in accordance with the law, and seriously hold the relevant entities and individuals legally responsible. Those suspected of crimes are transferred to the judicial authorities for processing according to the law.


 (XI) Severe Crackdown on Related Illegal and Criminal Activities. The Ministry of Public Security, the People's Bank of China, the State Administration for Market Regulation, the China Banking and Insurance Regulatory Commission, the China Securities Regulatory Commission, as well as judicial and procuratorial organs, in accordance with their respective responsibilities, rigorously crack down on illegal and criminal activities related to virtual currency, the tokenization of real-world assets, such as fraud, money laundering, illegal business operations, pyramid schemes, illegal fundraising, and other illegal and criminal activities carried out under the guise of virtual currency, the tokenization of real-world assets, etc.


  (XII) Strengthen Industry Self-discipline. Relevant industry associations should enhance membership management and policy advocacy, based on their own responsibilities, advocate and urge member units to resist illegal financial activities related to virtual currency and the tokenization of real-world assets. Member units that violate regulatory policies and industry self-discipline rules are to be disciplined in accordance with relevant self-regulatory management regulations. By leveraging various industry infrastructure, conduct risk monitoring related to virtual currency, the tokenization of real-world assets, and promptly transfer issue clues to relevant departments.


  IV. Strict Supervision of Domestic Entities Engaging in Overseas Business Activities


(XIII) Without the approval of relevant departments in accordance with the law and regulations, domestic entities and foreign entities controlled by them may not issue virtual currency overseas.


  (XIV) Domestic entities engaging directly or indirectly in overseas external debt-based tokenization of real-world assets, or conducting asset securitization activities abroad based on domestic ownership rights, income rights, etc. (hereinafter referred to as domestic equity), should be strictly regulated in accordance with the principles of "same business, same risk, same rules." The National Development and Reform Commission, the China Securities Regulatory Commission, the State Administration of Foreign Exchange, and other relevant departments regulate it according to their respective responsibilities. For other forms of overseas real-world asset tokenization activities based on domestic equity by domestic entities, the China Securities Regulatory Commission, together with relevant departments, supervise according to their division of responsibilities. Without the consent and filing of relevant departments, no unit or individual may engage in the above-mentioned business.


  (15) Overseas subsidiaries and branches of domestic financial institutions providing Real World Asset Tokenization-related services overseas shall do so legally and prudently. They shall have professional personnel and systems in place to effectively mitigate business risks, strictly implement customer onboarding, suitability management, anti-money laundering requirements, and incorporate them into the domestic financial institutions' compliance and risk management system. Intermediaries and information technology service providers offering Real World Asset Tokenization services abroad based on domestic equity or conducting Real World Asset Tokenization business in the form of overseas debt for domestic entities directly or indirectly venturing abroad must strictly comply with relevant laws and regulations. They should establish and improve relevant compliance and internal control systems in accordance with relevant normative requirements, strengthen business and risk control, and report the business developments to the relevant regulatory authorities for approval or filing.


  V. Strengthen Organizational Implementation


  (16) Strengthen organizational leadership and overall coordination. All departments and regions should attach great importance to the prevention of risks related to virtual currencies and Real World Asset Tokenization, strengthen organizational leadership, clarify work responsibilities, form a long-term effective working mechanism with centralized coordination, local implementation, and shared responsibilities, maintain high pressure, dynamically monitor risks, effectively prevent and mitigate risks in an orderly and efficient manner, legally protect the property security of the people, and make every effort to maintain economic and financial order and social stability.


  (17) Widely carry out publicity and education. All departments, regions, and industry associations should make full use of various media and other communication channels to disseminate information through legal and policy interpretation, analysis of typical cases, and education on investment risks, etc. They should promote the illegality and harm of virtual currencies and Real World Asset Tokenization-related businesses and their manifestations, fully alert to potential risks and hidden dangers, and enhance public awareness and identification capabilities for risk prevention.


  VI. Legal Responsibility


  (18) Engaging in illegal financial activities related to virtual currencies and Real World Asset Tokenization in violation of this notice, as well as providing services for virtual currencies and Real World Asset Tokenization-related businesses, shall be punished in accordance with relevant regulations. If it constitutes a crime, criminal liability shall be pursued according to the law. For domestic entities and individuals who knowingly or should have known that overseas entities illegally provided virtual currency or Real World Asset Tokenization-related services to domestic entities and still assisted them, relevant responsibilities shall be pursued according to the law. If it constitutes a crime, criminal liability shall be pursued according to the law.


  (19) If any unit or individual invests in virtual currencies, Real World Asset Tokens, and related financial products against public order and good customs, the relevant civil legal actions shall be invalid, and any resulting losses shall be borne by them. If there are suspicions of disrupting financial order and jeopardizing financial security, the relevant departments shall deal with them according to the law.


  This notice shall enter into force upon the date of its issuance. The People's Bank of China and ten other departments' "Notice on Further Preventing and Dealing with the Risks of Virtual Currency Trading Speculation" (Yinfa [2021] No. 237) is hereby repealed.


Former Partner's Perspective on Multicoin: Kyle's Exit, But the Game He Left Behind Just Getting Started

Kyle knew his game, so he decided to focus on playing the game he was good at and interested in.

Why Bitcoin Is Falling Now: The Real Reasons Behind BTC's Crash & WEEX's Smart Profit Playbook

Bitcoin's ongoing crash explained: Discover the 5 hidden triggers behind BTC's plunge & how WEEX's Auto Earn and Trade to Earn strategies help traders profit from crypto market volatility.

Wall Street's Hottest Trades See Exodus

This time there is no single triggering factor, but rather market anxiety about asset valuation, with many already skeptical of these valuations being too high, leading to investors choosing to retreat almost simultaneously.

Popular coins

Latest Crypto News

Read more