Coinbase Launches Binance Alpha2.0 Competitor, While Base Leading DEX Suffers Betrayal

By: blockbeats|2025/03/19 13:15:03
0
Share
copy

Yesterday, Binance just updated Binance Alpha2.0, allowing CEX users to purchase any DEX token directly from CEX without the need for withdrawal. CZ also commented, "I believe other CEXs will follow suit, and DEX trading volume will also increase." Following closely, Coinbase made its move.

Last night, Coinbase announced the launch of Verified Pools, a set of carefully curated liquidity pools. Users holding Coinbase Verifications certification can seamlessly conduct on-chain transactions by connecting their Prime Onchain wallet, Coinbase wallet, or other third-party wallets to Coinbase Verification credential for trading. This aims to address the opacity issue in traditional liquidity pools.

Verified Pools on the Base network are based on the Uniswap v4 protocol, leveraging a hooks mechanism to enable customizable smart contract functionality. Additionally, it has partnered with DeFi research and risk management firm Gauntlet to optimize liquidity pool configurations and ensure the overall health of the liquidity pools.

In the official announcement, Verified Pools are described as another important step by Coinbase to drive the adoption of on-chain applications. However, what surprised users in the Base community the most was that Verified Pools are based on Uniswap V4 instead of Aerodrome, Base's largest on-chain DEX application. Some even referred to this behavior as a "betrayal" of Aerodrome.

Coinbase Launches Binance Alpha2.0 Competitor, While Base Leading DEX Suffers Betrayal

Aerodrome is ranked first in TVL on Base; Image Source: DeFiLlama

So why did Coinbase's Verified Pools choose Uniswap instead of Aerodrome?

Compliance First, Uniswap is a More Cost-Effective Choice

There are many who do not understand Coinbase's approach, with even Sonic founder Andre Cronje asking, "Really confusing, Aerodrome and Alex have always been Base's most staunch supporters and advocates, this could have been completely built on Aerodrome. Isn't supporting your builders a slogan?"

In response to these questions, Aerodrome co-founder Alexander Cutler stated, "We had conversations with them early in our development and were fully capable of adding the same functionality—it just wasn't a priority at the time, but we will definitely watch its adoption."

He mentioned that Coinbase reached out to Aerodrome for a collaboration on a validation pool last summer, but there were still many unresolved issues with the validation pool's Product-Market Fit (PMF), so Aerodrome chose a larger opportunity as a priority at that time.

The core of the Coinbase validation pool lies in its on-chain Credential system tied to KYC verification. Uniswap V4's hooks mechanism can be customized to only allow LPs verified through Coinbase's KYC to participate, and this technological feature directly addresses regulatory compliance issues.

Uniswap V4's hooks are essentially a smart contract "plugin system" that allows developers to customize pool creation rules, fee structures, and permission management. This flexibility enables Coinbase to quickly deploy a whitelist access mechanism that complies with its regulatory framework and achieves a strong binding of LP identities through the on-chain Credential system.

Read more: "When Binance Launchpool Meets Uniswap V4, Whose Ace Is Bigger?"

As Aerodrome, being the native DEX on the Base chain, is positioned as a "liquidity hub," its underlying codebase does not natively support such complex permission layering designs. Even if achieved through forking or refactoring in the future, the development cycle and testing costs would be significantly higher than directly adopting Uniswap's mature solution.

As a publicly listed company, Coinbase has a very low tolerance for compliance risks. Although Aerodrome is the native DEX on the Base chain, its permissionless and highly autonomous protocol features are fundamentally at odds with Coinbase's regulatory framework. By directly integrating Aerodrome, Coinbase would assume liability for protocol vulnerabilities, money laundering risks, and even regulatory scrutiny. In contrast, Uniswap V4's modular design allows Coinbase to gradually test the waters through a controlled KYC Isolation Pool, avoiding regulatory minefields while leveraging Uniswap's brand credibility and liquidity network.

Alexander Cutler also acknowledged the "technically feasible" aspect but explicitly stated that features such as dynamic fee rate optimization would be prioritized over permissioned pool functionality.

In response to someone else's tweet, he wrote, "There are still many questions about how permissioned pools can become attractive enough to serve as a viable alternative to permissionless pools. If it truly gains market acceptance, we can always join in support. However, in the short term, it's unlikely to surpass opportunities like dynamic fees."

This choice reflects Aerodrome's inclination towards serving existing DeFi-native users rather than catering to Coinbase's compliance experiment. On the other hand, Coinbase aims to explore on-chain compliant transaction scenarios through the validation pool and gradually migrate CEX users to the chain, requiring instant usability and low compliance risk, with Uniswap V4 conveniently offering a ready-made technical interface.

More Experimental Than Product-Market Fit

However, some view whitelist liquidity pools as one of the anticipated use cases for Uniswap V4, with Coinbase's validation pool being merely the practical implementation of this concept. The most direct contradiction lies in the highly overlapping target users—institutional LPs on Coinbase's order book and compliant buyers are already accustomed to the low-friction environment of centralized trading platforms.

If on-chain centralized liquidity merely replicates CEX's order book functionality, users lack migration incentives—the gas costs, price slippage, and operational complexity of on-chain trading still exceed those of CEX, and traditional users rely more on CEX for instant settlement, fiat channels, and customer support. Even if the validation pool can offer slightly higher market-making returns, liquidity fragmentation may reduce capital efficiency, creating a dilemma of "compliance premium insufficient to cover migration costs."

A deeper challenge comes from the liquidity allocation paradox. If the validation pool focuses on Coinbase's unlisted assets, it will fall into a "chicken and egg" cycle: the high-risk nature of unaudited assets inherently conflicts with the conservative positioning of the compliance pool, and fund managers seeking alpha often lean towards early-stage assets on permissionless pools. This could turn the validation pool into a "compliance buffer zone" for market makers—earning fees through liquidity provision instead of capturing asset appreciation dividends.

Even if unlisted assets are allowed into the pool, whether they can serve as an "onboarding transition channel" remains questionable. As a publicly traded company, Coinbase will not relax its strict asset review standards due to the existence of on-chain pools; instead, it may tighten them further due to compliance pressure.

Despite Coinbase binding KYC identities on-chain, ZachXBT once revealed a systemic vulnerability: The dark web can exploit a risk of injecting illicit funds by purchasing/stealing KYC information to forge a "compliant identity." If a hacker offloads illegal ETH to a validation pool through a market maker, the disparity between on-chain anonymity and CEX risk management capabilities may lead to the entire pool being flagged as a "tainted asset pool," triggering regulatory scrutiny. More subtly, arbitrage bots still need to rely on market makers to balance prices, but the risk management capabilities of market makers are far below those of centralized CEX systems, ultimately potentially shifting the risk to ordinary users.

In the short term, the validation pool appears more like an "on-chain feasibility study"—utilizing Uniswap V4's hooks mechanism to build a minimal compliance model, testing regulatory tolerance and user behavior data; in the medium term, the plan is to iterate the interactive interface developed for this into an on-chain transaction standard tool, paving the way for future permissionless pool integration; the long-term goal remains to blur the boundaries between CEX and DEX, gradually realizing Brian Armstrong's vision of "on-chain/off-chain liquidity unification."

However, whether this experiment can overcome the "sandbox-to-reality" gap depends on two key variables: first, whether the U.S. SEC will view such pools as a "quasi-securities trading platform," and second, whether the speed of CEX user migration to on-chain can support liquidity density. At this stage, it is still too early to assert its success or failure.

You may also like

Token Cannot Compound, Where Is the Real Investment Opportunity?

The next chapter in the crypto industry will undoubtedly be written by Crypto-empowered Stocks.

February 6th Market Key Intelligence, How Much Did You Miss?

1. On-chain Flows: $508.2M USD inflow to Ethereum today; $390.8M USD outflow from Arbitrum 2. Biggest Gainers/Losers: $HBTC, $AIO 3. Top News: Current Bitcoin weekly RSI oversold signal comparable to June 2022

China's Central Bank and Eight Other Departments' Latest Regulatory Focus: Key Attention to RWA Tokenized Asset Risk


Foreword: Today, the People's Bank of China's website published the "Notice of the People's Bank of China, National Development and Reform Commission, Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, Ministry of Public Security, State Administration for Market Regulation, China Banking and Insurance Regulatory Commission, China Securities Regulatory Commission, State Administration of Foreign Exchange on Further Preventing and Dealing with Risks Related to Virtual Currency and Others (Yinfa [2026] No. 42)", the latest regulatory requirements from the eight departments including the central bank, which are basically consistent with the regulatory requirements of recent years. The main focus of the regulation is on speculative activities such as virtual currency trading, exchanges, ICOs, overseas platform services, and this time, regulatory oversight of RWA has been added, explicitly prohibiting RWA tokenization, stablecoins (especially those pegged to the RMB). The following is the full text:


To the people's governments of all provinces, autonomous regions, and municipalities directly under the Central Government, the Xinjiang Production and Construction Corps:


  Recently, there have been speculative activities related to virtual currency and Real-World Assets (RWA) tokenization, disrupting the economic and financial order and jeopardizing the property security of the people. In order to further prevent and address the risks related to virtual currency and Real-World Assets tokenization, effectively safeguard national security and social stability, in accordance with the "Law of the People's Republic of China on the People's Bank of China," "Law of the People's Republic of China on Commercial Banks," "Securities Law of the People's Republic of China," "Law of the People's Republic of China on Securities Investment Funds," "Law of the People's Republic of China on Futures and Derivatives," "Cybersecurity Law of the People's Republic of China," "Regulations of the People's Republic of China on the Administration of Renminbi," "Regulations on Prevention and Disposal of Illegal Fundraising," "Regulations of the People's Republic of China on Foreign Exchange Administration," "Telecommunications Regulations of the People's Republic of China," and other provisions, after reaching consensus with the Cyberspace Administration of China, the Supreme People's Court, and the Supreme People's Procuratorate, and with the approval of the State Council, the relevant matters are notified as follows:


  I. Clarify the essential attributes of virtual currency, Real-World Assets tokenization, and related business activities


  (I) Virtual currency does not possess the legal status equivalent to fiat currency. Virtual currencies such as Bitcoin, Ether, Tether, etc., have the main characteristics of being issued by non-monetary authorities, using encryption technology and distributed ledger or similar technology, existing in digital form, etc. They do not have legal tender status, should not and cannot be circulated and used as currency in the market.


  The business activities related to virtual currency are classified as illegal financial activities. The exchange of fiat currency and virtual currency within the territory, exchange of virtual currencies, acting as a central counterparty in buying and selling virtual currencies, providing information intermediary and pricing services for virtual currency transactions, token issuance financing, and trading of virtual currency-related financial products, etc., fall under illegal financial activities, such as suspected illegal issuance of token vouchers, unauthorized public issuance of securities, illegal operation of securities and futures business, illegal fundraising, etc., are strictly prohibited across the board and resolutely banned in accordance with the law. Overseas entities and individuals are not allowed to provide virtual currency-related services to domestic entities in any form.


  A stablecoin pegged to a fiat currency indirectly fulfills some functions of the fiat currency in circulation. Without the consent of relevant authorities in accordance with the law and regulations, any domestic or foreign entity or individual is not allowed to issue a RMB-pegged stablecoin overseas.


(II)Tokenization of Real-World Assets refers to the use of encryption technology and distributed ledger or similar technologies to transform ownership rights, income rights, etc., of assets into tokens (tokens) or other interests or bond certificates with token (token) characteristics, and carry out issuance and trading activities.


  Engaging in the tokenization of real-world assets domestically, as well as providing related intermediary, information technology services, etc., which are suspected of illegal issuance of token vouchers, unauthorized public offering of securities, illegal operation of securities and futures business, illegal fundraising, and other illegal financial activities, shall be prohibited; except for relevant business activities carried out with the approval of the competent authorities in accordance with the law and regulations and relying on specific financial infrastructures. Overseas entities and individuals are not allowed to illegally provide services related to the tokenization of real-world assets to domestic entities in any form.


  II. Sound Work Mechanism


  (III) Inter-agency Coordination. The People's Bank of China, together with the National Development and Reform Commission, the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, the Ministry of Public Security, the State Administration for Market Regulation, the China Banking and Insurance Regulatory Commission, the China Securities Regulatory Commission, the State Administration of Foreign Exchange, and other departments, will improve the work mechanism, strengthen coordination with the Cyberspace Administration of China, the Supreme People's Court, and the Supreme People's Procuratorate, coordinate efforts, and overall guide regions to carry out risk prevention and disposal of virtual currency-related illegal financial activities.


  The China Securities Regulatory Commission, together with the National Development and Reform Commission, the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, the Ministry of Public Security, the People's Bank of China, the State Administration for Market Regulation, the China Banking and Insurance Regulatory Commission, the State Administration of Foreign Exchange, and other departments, will improve the work mechanism, strengthen coordination with the Cyberspace Administration of China, the Supreme People's Court, and the Supreme People's Procuratorate, coordinate efforts, and overall guide regions to carry out risk prevention and disposal of illegal financial activities related to the tokenization of real-world assets.


  (IV) Strengthening Local Implementation. The people's governments at the provincial level are overall responsible for the prevention and disposal of risks related to virtual currencies and the tokenization of real-world assets in their respective administrative regions. The specific leading department is the local financial regulatory department, with participation from branches and dispatched institutions of the State Council's financial regulatory department, telecommunications regulators, public security, market supervision, and other departments, in coordination with cyberspace departments, courts, and procuratorates, to improve the normalization of the work mechanism, effectively connect with the relevant work mechanisms of central departments, form a cooperative and coordinated working pattern between central and local governments, effectively prevent and properly handle risks related to virtual currencies and the tokenization of real-world assets, and maintain economic and financial order and social stability.


  III. Strengthened Risk Monitoring, Prevention, and Disposal


  (5) Enhanced Risk Monitoring. The People's Bank of China, China Securities Regulatory Commission, National Development and Reform Commission, Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, Ministry of Public Security, State Administration of Foreign Exchange, Cyberspace Administration of China, and other departments continue to improve monitoring techniques and system support, enhance cross-departmental data analysis and sharing, establish sound information sharing and cross-validation mechanisms, promptly grasp the risk situation of activities related to virtual currency and real-world asset tokenization. Local governments at all levels give full play to the role of local monitoring and early warning mechanisms. Local financial regulatory authorities, together with branches and agencies of the State Council's financial regulatory authorities, as well as departments of cyberspace and public security, ensure effective connection between online monitoring, offline investigation, and fund tracking, efficiently and accurately identify activities related to virtual currency and real-world asset tokenization, promptly share risk information, improve early warning information dissemination, verification, and rapid response mechanisms.


  (6) Strengthened Oversight of Financial Institutions, Intermediaries, and Technology Service Providers. Financial institutions (including non-bank payment institutions) are prohibited from providing account opening, fund transfer, and clearing services for virtual currency-related business activities, issuing and selling financial products related to virtual currency, including virtual currency and related financial products in the scope of collateral, conducting insurance business related to virtual currency, or including virtual currency in the scope of insurance liability. Financial institutions (including non-bank payment institutions) are prohibited from providing custody, clearing, and settlement services for unauthorized real-world asset tokenization-related business and related financial products. Relevant intermediary institutions and information technology service providers are prohibited from providing intermediary, technical, or other services for unauthorized real-world asset tokenization-related businesses and related financial products.


  (7) Enhanced Management of Internet Information Content and Access. Internet enterprises are prohibited from providing online business venues, commercial displays, marketing, advertising, or paid traffic diversion services for virtual currency and real-world asset tokenization-related business activities. Upon discovering clues of illegal activities, they should promptly report to relevant departments and provide technical support and assistance for related investigations and inquiries. Based on the clues transferred by the financial regulatory authorities, the cyberspace administration, telecommunications authorities, and public security departments should promptly close and deal with websites, mobile applications (including mini-programs), and public accounts engaged in virtual currency and real-world asset tokenization-related business activities in accordance with the law.


  (8) Strengthened Entity Registration and Advertisement Management. Market supervision departments strengthen entity registration and management, and enterprise and individual business registrations must not contain terms such as "virtual currency," "virtual asset," "cryptocurrency," "crypto asset," "stablecoin," "real-world asset tokenization," or "RWA" in their names or business scopes. Market supervision departments, together with financial regulatory authorities, legally enhance the supervision of advertisements related to virtual currency and real-world asset tokenization, promptly investigating and handling relevant illegal advertisements.


  (IX) Continued Rectification of Virtual Currency Mining Activities. The National Development and Reform Commission, together with relevant departments, strictly controls virtual currency mining activities, continuously promotes the rectification of virtual currency mining activities. The people's governments of various provinces take overall responsibility for the rectification of "mining" within their respective administrative regions. In accordance with the requirements of the National Development and Reform Commission and other departments in the "Notice on the Rectification of Virtual Currency Mining Activities" (NDRC Energy-saving Building [2021] No. 1283) and the provisions of the "Guidance Catalog for Industrial Structure Adjustment (2024 Edition)," a comprehensive review, investigation, and closure of existing virtual currency mining projects are conducted, new mining projects are strictly prohibited, and mining machine production enterprises are strictly prohibited from providing mining machine sales and other services within the country.


  (X) Severe Crackdown on Related Illegal Financial Activities. Upon discovering clues to illegal financial activities related to virtual currency and the tokenization of real-world assets, local financial regulatory authorities, branches of the State Council's financial regulatory authorities, and other relevant departments promptly investigate, determine, and properly handle the issues in accordance with the law, and seriously hold the relevant entities and individuals legally responsible. Those suspected of crimes are transferred to the judicial authorities for processing according to the law.


 (XI) Severe Crackdown on Related Illegal and Criminal Activities. The Ministry of Public Security, the People's Bank of China, the State Administration for Market Regulation, the China Banking and Insurance Regulatory Commission, the China Securities Regulatory Commission, as well as judicial and procuratorial organs, in accordance with their respective responsibilities, rigorously crack down on illegal and criminal activities related to virtual currency, the tokenization of real-world assets, such as fraud, money laundering, illegal business operations, pyramid schemes, illegal fundraising, and other illegal and criminal activities carried out under the guise of virtual currency, the tokenization of real-world assets, etc.


  (XII) Strengthen Industry Self-discipline. Relevant industry associations should enhance membership management and policy advocacy, based on their own responsibilities, advocate and urge member units to resist illegal financial activities related to virtual currency and the tokenization of real-world assets. Member units that violate regulatory policies and industry self-discipline rules are to be disciplined in accordance with relevant self-regulatory management regulations. By leveraging various industry infrastructure, conduct risk monitoring related to virtual currency, the tokenization of real-world assets, and promptly transfer issue clues to relevant departments.


  IV. Strict Supervision of Domestic Entities Engaging in Overseas Business Activities


(XIII) Without the approval of relevant departments in accordance with the law and regulations, domestic entities and foreign entities controlled by them may not issue virtual currency overseas.


  (XIV) Domestic entities engaging directly or indirectly in overseas external debt-based tokenization of real-world assets, or conducting asset securitization activities abroad based on domestic ownership rights, income rights, etc. (hereinafter referred to as domestic equity), should be strictly regulated in accordance with the principles of "same business, same risk, same rules." The National Development and Reform Commission, the China Securities Regulatory Commission, the State Administration of Foreign Exchange, and other relevant departments regulate it according to their respective responsibilities. For other forms of overseas real-world asset tokenization activities based on domestic equity by domestic entities, the China Securities Regulatory Commission, together with relevant departments, supervise according to their division of responsibilities. Without the consent and filing of relevant departments, no unit or individual may engage in the above-mentioned business.


  (15) Overseas subsidiaries and branches of domestic financial institutions providing Real World Asset Tokenization-related services overseas shall do so legally and prudently. They shall have professional personnel and systems in place to effectively mitigate business risks, strictly implement customer onboarding, suitability management, anti-money laundering requirements, and incorporate them into the domestic financial institutions' compliance and risk management system. Intermediaries and information technology service providers offering Real World Asset Tokenization services abroad based on domestic equity or conducting Real World Asset Tokenization business in the form of overseas debt for domestic entities directly or indirectly venturing abroad must strictly comply with relevant laws and regulations. They should establish and improve relevant compliance and internal control systems in accordance with relevant normative requirements, strengthen business and risk control, and report the business developments to the relevant regulatory authorities for approval or filing.


  V. Strengthen Organizational Implementation


  (16) Strengthen organizational leadership and overall coordination. All departments and regions should attach great importance to the prevention of risks related to virtual currencies and Real World Asset Tokenization, strengthen organizational leadership, clarify work responsibilities, form a long-term effective working mechanism with centralized coordination, local implementation, and shared responsibilities, maintain high pressure, dynamically monitor risks, effectively prevent and mitigate risks in an orderly and efficient manner, legally protect the property security of the people, and make every effort to maintain economic and financial order and social stability.


  (17) Widely carry out publicity and education. All departments, regions, and industry associations should make full use of various media and other communication channels to disseminate information through legal and policy interpretation, analysis of typical cases, and education on investment risks, etc. They should promote the illegality and harm of virtual currencies and Real World Asset Tokenization-related businesses and their manifestations, fully alert to potential risks and hidden dangers, and enhance public awareness and identification capabilities for risk prevention.


  VI. Legal Responsibility


  (18) Engaging in illegal financial activities related to virtual currencies and Real World Asset Tokenization in violation of this notice, as well as providing services for virtual currencies and Real World Asset Tokenization-related businesses, shall be punished in accordance with relevant regulations. If it constitutes a crime, criminal liability shall be pursued according to the law. For domestic entities and individuals who knowingly or should have known that overseas entities illegally provided virtual currency or Real World Asset Tokenization-related services to domestic entities and still assisted them, relevant responsibilities shall be pursued according to the law. If it constitutes a crime, criminal liability shall be pursued according to the law.


  (19) If any unit or individual invests in virtual currencies, Real World Asset Tokens, and related financial products against public order and good customs, the relevant civil legal actions shall be invalid, and any resulting losses shall be borne by them. If there are suspicions of disrupting financial order and jeopardizing financial security, the relevant departments shall deal with them according to the law.


  This notice shall enter into force upon the date of its issuance. The People's Bank of China and ten other departments' "Notice on Further Preventing and Dealing with the Risks of Virtual Currency Trading Speculation" (Yinfa [2021] No. 237) is hereby repealed.


Former Partner's Perspective on Multicoin: Kyle's Exit, But the Game He Left Behind Just Getting Started

Kyle knew his game, so he decided to focus on playing the game he was good at and interested in.

Why Bitcoin Is Falling Now: The Real Reasons Behind BTC's Crash & WEEX's Smart Profit Playbook

Bitcoin's ongoing crash explained: Discover the 5 hidden triggers behind BTC's plunge & how WEEX's Auto Earn and Trade to Earn strategies help traders profit from crypto market volatility.

Wall Street's Hottest Trades See Exodus

This time there is no single triggering factor, but rather market anxiety about asset valuation, with many already skeptical of these valuations being too high, leading to investors choosing to retreat almost simultaneously.

Popular coins

Latest Crypto News

Read more