For the first time in four years, Bitcoin may be facing a "User-Activated Soft Fork" (UASF)?

By: blockbeats|2025/03/20 12:00:03
0
Share
copy
Original Article Title: "For the First Time in Four Years, Bitcoin Could See a 'User-Activated Soft Fork'?"
Original Article Author: GaryMa, Wu Shuo Blockchain

According to a Blockspace report, the Bitcoin base layer community is beginning to drive changes to Bitcoin's underlying software, which is a rare event in over four years (previously, major underlying changes were mostly driven by the core developer group).

The emerging grassroots support this time is for two Bitcoin Improvement Proposals (BIPs), namely BIP-119 (CTV) and BIP-348 (CSFS). These two proposals introduce a new way to write Bitcoin scripts, enabling Bitcoin to achieve "Covenants" functionality. These two proposals may be implemented in the next Bitcoin soft fork.

To help readers who may temporarily not understand Bitcoin's Covenants and the specific relationship of these BIP proposals, let's clarify here:

Simply put, Covenants are a functional concept in the Bitcoin network, while the two mentioned BIPs are different implementation proposals to achieve this functional concept.

What Are Bitcoin Covenants?

Definition:

Covenants are a proposed mechanism in the Bitcoin protocol that allows conditions or restrictions to be set in transactions, specifying how Bitcoin can be spent or transferred. These conditions can span multiple transactions, restricting future spending, thereby enhancing Bitcoin's script capabilities.

Role:

· Enhance Bitcoin's smart contract capabilities, supporting more complex applications (e.g., loans, decentralized trading platforms, custody services).

· Improve security to prevent fund theft or misuse.

· Optimize network performance, such as reducing transaction fees or enhancing privacy.

From this, we can roughly understand that Covenants are a concept, and the BIP-119 (CTV) and BIP-348 (CSFS) mentioned in this article are specific implementations of this Covenant functionality.

Current Status:

The Bitcoin mainnet currently does not formally integrate any Covenant-related functionality, although related discussions and proposals (such as BIP-119) have been advancing for years.

BIP 119: OP_CHECKTEMPLATEVERIFY (CTV)

An proposed Bitcoin opcode that allows a transaction output to specify a "template," requiring subsequent spending transactions to match that template.

Proposed by former Bitcoin Core contributor Jeremy Rubin, it has existed for over five years. By restricting funds to be spent only in a predefined way, it achieves "state carrying" functionality.

Use cases include:

· Creating batch payments to reduce transaction fees. Building decentralized exchange (DEX) or lending protocols.

· Implementing Vaults to protect funds from theft.

· CTV is a lightweight implementation of Covenants, focusing on output format restrictions rather than involving complex logic.

BIP 348: OP_CHECKSIGFROMSTACK (CSFS)

A proposed Bitcoin opcode that allows verifying a signature's validity for any message, not just the hash of the current transaction. It retrieves the signature, public key, and message from the data stack and checks if the signature matches.

Formally proposed by Jeremy Rubin and Brandon Black in November 2024.

OP_CSFS is a powerful tool for implementing more flexible Covenants as it enables "introspection" on transaction inputs, allowing verification of the full content or state of a signature transaction.

Specific applications:

· Covenant Implementation: OP_CSFS can be used to create complex conditional logic to ensure funds are spent according to specific rules. For example, validators can check if a transaction input complies with a preset template or restriction.

· Security Enhancements: Supporting Vaults and decentralized protocols to prevent theft or unauthorized spending through signature verification.

· Scalability: Combined with other opcodes (such as OP_CAT), it can be used to build more complex smart contracts.

When discussing Bitcoin Covenants and the BIP-119 (CTV) and BIP-348 (CSFS) proposals, OP_CAT is definitely a key part of the conversation.

BIP 347: OP_CAT

History:

Early Existence: OP_CAT is part of the original Bitcoin Script language, included by Satoshi Nakamoto upon Bitcoin's launch in 2009. It was initially designed to enhance script flexibility and support more complex logic.

Removal Reason (2010):

· OP_CAT was removed (disabled) in 2010 to prevent potential security vulnerabilities and resource abuse.

· Specific Issue: Without restrictions, OP_CAT could be used by malicious users to generate infinitely long data (through recursive calls), leading to a Denial of Service Attack, as Bitcoin nodes would need to process this data, increasing computational and storage costs.

· At that time, the Bitcoin script language was simplified, retaining only the most basic functionality, ensuring protocol lightness, security, and decentralization.

Definition and Purpose:

OP_CAT is a Bitcoin Script operation code (Opcode). It is not a direct Covenant implementation but is a potential tool for building complex Covenant logic. Compared to the two aforementioned opcodes, OP_CAT is more general-purpose, suitable for data operations, but it needs to be combined with other opcodes to achieve complex functionality.

Current Status:

The Bitcoin community has recently been discussing the reintroduction of OP_CAT. Previously appearing in the form of the somewhat whimsical BIP-420 proposal, it has now been formally merged into the bitcoin/bips repository under the BIP-347 number.

How the Progress Is Going

According to Coindesk reports, over the past few weeks, many Western Bitcoin developers have expressed their support for CTV and CSFS on Twitter — this is undoubtedly a strong signal that at least in the social media sphere, part of the Bitcoin community is moving towards accepting these changes.

Furthermore, developers generally believe that the definitions of these two proposals are "narrow." In simple terms, this means that once activated, there is a low likelihood of being accidentally abused by users. The Bitcoin developer community has always been cautious about changes to Bitcoin. For example, although BIP 119 has been postponed for nearly five years, CTV was recently seen as too aggressive and unsuitable for activation.

The co-founder of these two proposals, Jeremy Rubin, had previously faced strong opposition for his efforts to promote CTV—especially from some influential Bitcoin thought leaders with large followings, such as Adam Back and Jimmy Song. The various criticisms eventually evolved into widespread dissatisfaction within the Bitcoin community, forcing Rubin to eventually fade out of the Bitcoin space.

So, what led to this change? Recent advocacy for the OP_CAT opcode seems to have expanded the perceived scope of what is "acceptable" in Bitcoin proposals, positioning CTV and CSFS as relatively "conservative" options. It is noteworthy that most supporters of OP_CAT also support BIP 119 and BIP 348 (as well as most other proposals).

What can we expect next? Firstly, the discussion will continue. Developers are expected to further explore these proposals at several technical conferences, such as the planned OPNEXT in April, BTC++ in July, and TABConf in October. Once developers reach preliminary consensus, the actual activation of the soft fork will be handed over to miners, the community, and investors for final confirmation.

How to follow up on BIPs' community discussion progress/soft fork process?

The answer is quite challenging!

Bitcoin's technical community usually engages in in-depth discussions on these proposals. However, this is a seemingly opaque and cyclical discussion process.

In essence, the Bitcoin soft fork process requires a rough estimation of the level of support from various Bitcoin stakeholders, including developers, custodians, investors, and miners. The most direct support indicator usually comes from miners, as they can signal approval of codebase changes by including signals in the blocks they mine. Typically, Bitcoin Core requires a signaling support from 95% of blocks over a period of time before proceeding to lock in the update for activation.

However, there is currently no consensus on how to define "widespread support," and Bitcoin consensus is always evolving. Miners are crucial signal providers simply because they are a "countable" entity in the Bitcoin network. In other words, due to Bitcoin's decentralized structure, it is challenging to visually measure overall consensus.

Nevertheless, Taproot Wizards, a development company famous for Bitcoin NFTs, has unveiled the long and complex process of a Bitcoin soft fork using OP_CAT as an example in a flowchart format. Readers interested in this can refer to https://www.quantumcats.xyz/bip-land for a detailed view; here, we will attempt to summarize:

BIP Proposal Lifecycle | The Long and Complex Journey of a Bitcoin Soft Fork

1. The proposal is initially brought up and discussed on the Bitcoin developers mailing list.

2. It moves on to a broader community discussion, delving into the long-standing debate of the pros and cons of the proposal; if further progress cannot be made, it may end here.

3. The grassroots community drafts a BIP proposal on Github.

4. Developers begin working on the related code implementation, which must pass a thorough audit to proceed.

5. After review by the Bitcoin repository BIP editors and initial community acceptance, the proposal is assigned a formal BIP number.

6. It moves on to the Signet test network. Signet is a Bitcoin test network that allows developers to experiment with new features or code changes without impacting the mainnet. (Many new features may end up permanently stuck at this stage.)

7. It may undergo testing on the Liquid sidechain.

8. A PR is submitted to Bitcoin Core.

9. It enters the Bitcoin Core code review and proposal merge process, which is highly uncertain. Only when most objections are addressed and technical requirements are met (no major bugs) does the proposal stand a chance of moving towards the merge phase; the opinions of key developers (such as Pieter Wuille) often hold significant weight, and their approval or rejection can greatly impact the fate of the proposal.

10. If the code review goes smoothly, the proposal waits for Bitcoin repository maintainers to merge the PR into the main project. Currently, there are five maintainers: Michael Ford (fanquake), Hennadii Stepanov (hebasto), Andrew Chow (achow101), Gloria Zhao (glozow), Ryan Ofsky (ryanofsky).

11. Further potential controversies and discussions among different groups in the Bitcoin community, including developers and miners.

12. Activation Mechanism Selection:

a. Miner-Activated Soft Fork (MASF): New rules are activated by miners through signaling (usually a 95% threshold), following the default mode of BIP-9 or BIP-8. This method is more stable but requires coordination for widespread consensus and testing, hence taking longer;

b. User-Activated Soft Fork (UASF): A protocol upgrade method initiated by Bitcoin users to enforce new rules (such as BIP-8's "Lockinontimeout: True"), bypassing miner resistance, with potential chain split risk and community division.

Conclusion

Previously reported by Wu, Bitcoin.org domain maintainer Cobra warned that the Bitcoin network might, in 2025, see a user-activated soft fork (UASF) initiated by an anonymous developer outside of Bitcoin Core, essentially referring to the potential changes in BIP 119 mentioned in this article. Cobra believes that these improvements could trigger a divide between the "status quo camp" and the "upgrade camp," led by the grassroots community and propelled by non-Bitcoin Core developers.

Understood to be a protocol upgrade method initiated by Bitcoin users, User-Activated Soft Fork (UASF) enforces protocol updates through upgraded node software, even if miners or others do not support it, thus implying a chain split risk. Of course, there is no need to be overly concerned at the moment, as many things are still undecided. For example, will future soft forks only include CTV and CSFS? Will OP_CAT, often discussed alongside this set of opcodes, be considered? How will the actual activation process of the soft fork unfold? Will other stakeholders, such as Bitcoin miners, give it enough attention?

Ultimately, as long as there is sufficient consensus on BIPs, proposals driven by the grassroots community can also take the form of miner-activated soft forks (MASF). Furthermore, even with UASF, there have been successful cases in history. UASF played a crucial role in the 2017 SegWit upgrade, where users successfully drove a soft fork, avoided a hard fork, and promoted Bitcoin scalability.

Reference Links:
https://www.coindesk.com/tech/2025/03/17/developer-consensus-may-be-converging-on-a-bitcoin-soft-fork-proposal-blockspace
https://www.quantumcats.xyz/bip-land
https://github.com/bitcoin/bips

Original Article Link

You may also like

Token Cannot Compound, Where Is the Real Investment Opportunity?

The next chapter in the crypto industry will undoubtedly be written by Crypto-empowered Stocks.

February 6th Market Key Intelligence, How Much Did You Miss?

1. On-chain Flows: $508.2M USD inflow to Ethereum today; $390.8M USD outflow from Arbitrum 2. Biggest Gainers/Losers: $HBTC, $AIO 3. Top News: Current Bitcoin weekly RSI oversold signal comparable to June 2022

China's Central Bank and Eight Other Departments' Latest Regulatory Focus: Key Attention to RWA Tokenized Asset Risk


Foreword: Today, the People's Bank of China's website published the "Notice of the People's Bank of China, National Development and Reform Commission, Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, Ministry of Public Security, State Administration for Market Regulation, China Banking and Insurance Regulatory Commission, China Securities Regulatory Commission, State Administration of Foreign Exchange on Further Preventing and Dealing with Risks Related to Virtual Currency and Others (Yinfa [2026] No. 42)", the latest regulatory requirements from the eight departments including the central bank, which are basically consistent with the regulatory requirements of recent years. The main focus of the regulation is on speculative activities such as virtual currency trading, exchanges, ICOs, overseas platform services, and this time, regulatory oversight of RWA has been added, explicitly prohibiting RWA tokenization, stablecoins (especially those pegged to the RMB). The following is the full text:


To the people's governments of all provinces, autonomous regions, and municipalities directly under the Central Government, the Xinjiang Production and Construction Corps:


  Recently, there have been speculative activities related to virtual currency and Real-World Assets (RWA) tokenization, disrupting the economic and financial order and jeopardizing the property security of the people. In order to further prevent and address the risks related to virtual currency and Real-World Assets tokenization, effectively safeguard national security and social stability, in accordance with the "Law of the People's Republic of China on the People's Bank of China," "Law of the People's Republic of China on Commercial Banks," "Securities Law of the People's Republic of China," "Law of the People's Republic of China on Securities Investment Funds," "Law of the People's Republic of China on Futures and Derivatives," "Cybersecurity Law of the People's Republic of China," "Regulations of the People's Republic of China on the Administration of Renminbi," "Regulations on Prevention and Disposal of Illegal Fundraising," "Regulations of the People's Republic of China on Foreign Exchange Administration," "Telecommunications Regulations of the People's Republic of China," and other provisions, after reaching consensus with the Cyberspace Administration of China, the Supreme People's Court, and the Supreme People's Procuratorate, and with the approval of the State Council, the relevant matters are notified as follows:


  I. Clarify the essential attributes of virtual currency, Real-World Assets tokenization, and related business activities


  (I) Virtual currency does not possess the legal status equivalent to fiat currency. Virtual currencies such as Bitcoin, Ether, Tether, etc., have the main characteristics of being issued by non-monetary authorities, using encryption technology and distributed ledger or similar technology, existing in digital form, etc. They do not have legal tender status, should not and cannot be circulated and used as currency in the market.


  The business activities related to virtual currency are classified as illegal financial activities. The exchange of fiat currency and virtual currency within the territory, exchange of virtual currencies, acting as a central counterparty in buying and selling virtual currencies, providing information intermediary and pricing services for virtual currency transactions, token issuance financing, and trading of virtual currency-related financial products, etc., fall under illegal financial activities, such as suspected illegal issuance of token vouchers, unauthorized public issuance of securities, illegal operation of securities and futures business, illegal fundraising, etc., are strictly prohibited across the board and resolutely banned in accordance with the law. Overseas entities and individuals are not allowed to provide virtual currency-related services to domestic entities in any form.


  A stablecoin pegged to a fiat currency indirectly fulfills some functions of the fiat currency in circulation. Without the consent of relevant authorities in accordance with the law and regulations, any domestic or foreign entity or individual is not allowed to issue a RMB-pegged stablecoin overseas.


(II)Tokenization of Real-World Assets refers to the use of encryption technology and distributed ledger or similar technologies to transform ownership rights, income rights, etc., of assets into tokens (tokens) or other interests or bond certificates with token (token) characteristics, and carry out issuance and trading activities.


  Engaging in the tokenization of real-world assets domestically, as well as providing related intermediary, information technology services, etc., which are suspected of illegal issuance of token vouchers, unauthorized public offering of securities, illegal operation of securities and futures business, illegal fundraising, and other illegal financial activities, shall be prohibited; except for relevant business activities carried out with the approval of the competent authorities in accordance with the law and regulations and relying on specific financial infrastructures. Overseas entities and individuals are not allowed to illegally provide services related to the tokenization of real-world assets to domestic entities in any form.


  II. Sound Work Mechanism


  (III) Inter-agency Coordination. The People's Bank of China, together with the National Development and Reform Commission, the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, the Ministry of Public Security, the State Administration for Market Regulation, the China Banking and Insurance Regulatory Commission, the China Securities Regulatory Commission, the State Administration of Foreign Exchange, and other departments, will improve the work mechanism, strengthen coordination with the Cyberspace Administration of China, the Supreme People's Court, and the Supreme People's Procuratorate, coordinate efforts, and overall guide regions to carry out risk prevention and disposal of virtual currency-related illegal financial activities.


  The China Securities Regulatory Commission, together with the National Development and Reform Commission, the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, the Ministry of Public Security, the People's Bank of China, the State Administration for Market Regulation, the China Banking and Insurance Regulatory Commission, the State Administration of Foreign Exchange, and other departments, will improve the work mechanism, strengthen coordination with the Cyberspace Administration of China, the Supreme People's Court, and the Supreme People's Procuratorate, coordinate efforts, and overall guide regions to carry out risk prevention and disposal of illegal financial activities related to the tokenization of real-world assets.


  (IV) Strengthening Local Implementation. The people's governments at the provincial level are overall responsible for the prevention and disposal of risks related to virtual currencies and the tokenization of real-world assets in their respective administrative regions. The specific leading department is the local financial regulatory department, with participation from branches and dispatched institutions of the State Council's financial regulatory department, telecommunications regulators, public security, market supervision, and other departments, in coordination with cyberspace departments, courts, and procuratorates, to improve the normalization of the work mechanism, effectively connect with the relevant work mechanisms of central departments, form a cooperative and coordinated working pattern between central and local governments, effectively prevent and properly handle risks related to virtual currencies and the tokenization of real-world assets, and maintain economic and financial order and social stability.


  III. Strengthened Risk Monitoring, Prevention, and Disposal


  (5) Enhanced Risk Monitoring. The People's Bank of China, China Securities Regulatory Commission, National Development and Reform Commission, Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, Ministry of Public Security, State Administration of Foreign Exchange, Cyberspace Administration of China, and other departments continue to improve monitoring techniques and system support, enhance cross-departmental data analysis and sharing, establish sound information sharing and cross-validation mechanisms, promptly grasp the risk situation of activities related to virtual currency and real-world asset tokenization. Local governments at all levels give full play to the role of local monitoring and early warning mechanisms. Local financial regulatory authorities, together with branches and agencies of the State Council's financial regulatory authorities, as well as departments of cyberspace and public security, ensure effective connection between online monitoring, offline investigation, and fund tracking, efficiently and accurately identify activities related to virtual currency and real-world asset tokenization, promptly share risk information, improve early warning information dissemination, verification, and rapid response mechanisms.


  (6) Strengthened Oversight of Financial Institutions, Intermediaries, and Technology Service Providers. Financial institutions (including non-bank payment institutions) are prohibited from providing account opening, fund transfer, and clearing services for virtual currency-related business activities, issuing and selling financial products related to virtual currency, including virtual currency and related financial products in the scope of collateral, conducting insurance business related to virtual currency, or including virtual currency in the scope of insurance liability. Financial institutions (including non-bank payment institutions) are prohibited from providing custody, clearing, and settlement services for unauthorized real-world asset tokenization-related business and related financial products. Relevant intermediary institutions and information technology service providers are prohibited from providing intermediary, technical, or other services for unauthorized real-world asset tokenization-related businesses and related financial products.


  (7) Enhanced Management of Internet Information Content and Access. Internet enterprises are prohibited from providing online business venues, commercial displays, marketing, advertising, or paid traffic diversion services for virtual currency and real-world asset tokenization-related business activities. Upon discovering clues of illegal activities, they should promptly report to relevant departments and provide technical support and assistance for related investigations and inquiries. Based on the clues transferred by the financial regulatory authorities, the cyberspace administration, telecommunications authorities, and public security departments should promptly close and deal with websites, mobile applications (including mini-programs), and public accounts engaged in virtual currency and real-world asset tokenization-related business activities in accordance with the law.


  (8) Strengthened Entity Registration and Advertisement Management. Market supervision departments strengthen entity registration and management, and enterprise and individual business registrations must not contain terms such as "virtual currency," "virtual asset," "cryptocurrency," "crypto asset," "stablecoin," "real-world asset tokenization," or "RWA" in their names or business scopes. Market supervision departments, together with financial regulatory authorities, legally enhance the supervision of advertisements related to virtual currency and real-world asset tokenization, promptly investigating and handling relevant illegal advertisements.


  (IX) Continued Rectification of Virtual Currency Mining Activities. The National Development and Reform Commission, together with relevant departments, strictly controls virtual currency mining activities, continuously promotes the rectification of virtual currency mining activities. The people's governments of various provinces take overall responsibility for the rectification of "mining" within their respective administrative regions. In accordance with the requirements of the National Development and Reform Commission and other departments in the "Notice on the Rectification of Virtual Currency Mining Activities" (NDRC Energy-saving Building [2021] No. 1283) and the provisions of the "Guidance Catalog for Industrial Structure Adjustment (2024 Edition)," a comprehensive review, investigation, and closure of existing virtual currency mining projects are conducted, new mining projects are strictly prohibited, and mining machine production enterprises are strictly prohibited from providing mining machine sales and other services within the country.


  (X) Severe Crackdown on Related Illegal Financial Activities. Upon discovering clues to illegal financial activities related to virtual currency and the tokenization of real-world assets, local financial regulatory authorities, branches of the State Council's financial regulatory authorities, and other relevant departments promptly investigate, determine, and properly handle the issues in accordance with the law, and seriously hold the relevant entities and individuals legally responsible. Those suspected of crimes are transferred to the judicial authorities for processing according to the law.


 (XI) Severe Crackdown on Related Illegal and Criminal Activities. The Ministry of Public Security, the People's Bank of China, the State Administration for Market Regulation, the China Banking and Insurance Regulatory Commission, the China Securities Regulatory Commission, as well as judicial and procuratorial organs, in accordance with their respective responsibilities, rigorously crack down on illegal and criminal activities related to virtual currency, the tokenization of real-world assets, such as fraud, money laundering, illegal business operations, pyramid schemes, illegal fundraising, and other illegal and criminal activities carried out under the guise of virtual currency, the tokenization of real-world assets, etc.


  (XII) Strengthen Industry Self-discipline. Relevant industry associations should enhance membership management and policy advocacy, based on their own responsibilities, advocate and urge member units to resist illegal financial activities related to virtual currency and the tokenization of real-world assets. Member units that violate regulatory policies and industry self-discipline rules are to be disciplined in accordance with relevant self-regulatory management regulations. By leveraging various industry infrastructure, conduct risk monitoring related to virtual currency, the tokenization of real-world assets, and promptly transfer issue clues to relevant departments.


  IV. Strict Supervision of Domestic Entities Engaging in Overseas Business Activities


(XIII) Without the approval of relevant departments in accordance with the law and regulations, domestic entities and foreign entities controlled by them may not issue virtual currency overseas.


  (XIV) Domestic entities engaging directly or indirectly in overseas external debt-based tokenization of real-world assets, or conducting asset securitization activities abroad based on domestic ownership rights, income rights, etc. (hereinafter referred to as domestic equity), should be strictly regulated in accordance with the principles of "same business, same risk, same rules." The National Development and Reform Commission, the China Securities Regulatory Commission, the State Administration of Foreign Exchange, and other relevant departments regulate it according to their respective responsibilities. For other forms of overseas real-world asset tokenization activities based on domestic equity by domestic entities, the China Securities Regulatory Commission, together with relevant departments, supervise according to their division of responsibilities. Without the consent and filing of relevant departments, no unit or individual may engage in the above-mentioned business.


  (15) Overseas subsidiaries and branches of domestic financial institutions providing Real World Asset Tokenization-related services overseas shall do so legally and prudently. They shall have professional personnel and systems in place to effectively mitigate business risks, strictly implement customer onboarding, suitability management, anti-money laundering requirements, and incorporate them into the domestic financial institutions' compliance and risk management system. Intermediaries and information technology service providers offering Real World Asset Tokenization services abroad based on domestic equity or conducting Real World Asset Tokenization business in the form of overseas debt for domestic entities directly or indirectly venturing abroad must strictly comply with relevant laws and regulations. They should establish and improve relevant compliance and internal control systems in accordance with relevant normative requirements, strengthen business and risk control, and report the business developments to the relevant regulatory authorities for approval or filing.


  V. Strengthen Organizational Implementation


  (16) Strengthen organizational leadership and overall coordination. All departments and regions should attach great importance to the prevention of risks related to virtual currencies and Real World Asset Tokenization, strengthen organizational leadership, clarify work responsibilities, form a long-term effective working mechanism with centralized coordination, local implementation, and shared responsibilities, maintain high pressure, dynamically monitor risks, effectively prevent and mitigate risks in an orderly and efficient manner, legally protect the property security of the people, and make every effort to maintain economic and financial order and social stability.


  (17) Widely carry out publicity and education. All departments, regions, and industry associations should make full use of various media and other communication channels to disseminate information through legal and policy interpretation, analysis of typical cases, and education on investment risks, etc. They should promote the illegality and harm of virtual currencies and Real World Asset Tokenization-related businesses and their manifestations, fully alert to potential risks and hidden dangers, and enhance public awareness and identification capabilities for risk prevention.


  VI. Legal Responsibility


  (18) Engaging in illegal financial activities related to virtual currencies and Real World Asset Tokenization in violation of this notice, as well as providing services for virtual currencies and Real World Asset Tokenization-related businesses, shall be punished in accordance with relevant regulations. If it constitutes a crime, criminal liability shall be pursued according to the law. For domestic entities and individuals who knowingly or should have known that overseas entities illegally provided virtual currency or Real World Asset Tokenization-related services to domestic entities and still assisted them, relevant responsibilities shall be pursued according to the law. If it constitutes a crime, criminal liability shall be pursued according to the law.


  (19) If any unit or individual invests in virtual currencies, Real World Asset Tokens, and related financial products against public order and good customs, the relevant civil legal actions shall be invalid, and any resulting losses shall be borne by them. If there are suspicions of disrupting financial order and jeopardizing financial security, the relevant departments shall deal with them according to the law.


  This notice shall enter into force upon the date of its issuance. The People's Bank of China and ten other departments' "Notice on Further Preventing and Dealing with the Risks of Virtual Currency Trading Speculation" (Yinfa [2021] No. 237) is hereby repealed.


Former Partner's Perspective on Multicoin: Kyle's Exit, But the Game He Left Behind Just Getting Started

Kyle knew his game, so he decided to focus on playing the game he was good at and interested in.

Why Bitcoin Is Falling Now: The Real Reasons Behind BTC's Crash & WEEX's Smart Profit Playbook

Bitcoin's ongoing crash explained: Discover the 5 hidden triggers behind BTC's plunge & how WEEX's Auto Earn and Trade to Earn strategies help traders profit from crypto market volatility.

Wall Street's Hottest Trades See Exodus

This time there is no single triggering factor, but rather market anxiety about asset valuation, with many already skeptical of these valuations being too high, leading to investors choosing to retreat almost simultaneously.

Popular coins

Latest Crypto News

Read more