In-Depth Comparison of GMX, Jupiter, and Drift: Who Is Solana's Perpetual King?

By: blockbeats|2025/04/01 13:00:04
0
Share
copy
Original Article Title: Solana Perpetual Powerhouses: An Overview of GMX-Solana, Jupiter, and Drift
Original Article Author: @castle_labs
Original Article Translation: zhouzhou, BlockBeats

Abstract: The DEX to CEX derivatives trading volume ratio has reached an all-time high, and Solana is poised to benefit from it.

Editor's Note: This article analyzes the major on-chain derivatives protocols on Solana, including GMX-Solana, Jupiter Perps, and Drift, comparing their liquidity, trading volume, capital efficiency, and risk management. Jupiter and Drift have shown consistent growth but lower capital efficiency, while GMX-Solana has higher capital efficiency but lower liquidity. As Solana introduces enhanced features and incentives to the protocols, market competition will intensify. The DEX to CEX derivatives trading volume ratio has reached an all-time high, and Solana is poised to benefit from it.

The following is the original content (slightly rephrased for readability):

BitMEX introduced perpetual contracts in 2016, becoming a key part of the crypto derivatives market. Perpetual derivatives are futures contracts without an expiration date, meaning users are not liquidated until they add more margin. It allows users to go long or short on their chosen asset and provides optimal leverage opportunities to define their risk tolerance.

The on-chain derivatives market has evolved over the years, successfully achieving product-market fit, initially appearing on Ethereum and then expanding to other ecosystems. In these ecosystems, Solana perpetual contracts have seen significant success, with @Jupiterexchange and @Driftprotocol emerging as the primary trading platforms.

Recently, one of the most prominent perpetual trading platforms on Arbitrum and Avalanche, GMX, has also launched on Solana, operating under the name @gmx_sol. This marks another milestone in the maturing Solana DeFi ecosystem. This study will analyze the rapid development of the perpetual contract ecosystem on Solana, focusing on the two major mainstream perpetual protocols on Solana, Jupiter and Drift, as well as the significant EVM perpetual protocol GMX, which has recently entered the Solana network.

1. Platform Overview

This section will compare the operation, key data, and product offerings of the above protocols.

1.1 GMX-Solana

In-Depth Comparison of GMX, Jupiter, and Drift: Who Is Solana's Perpetual King?

GMX-Solana is a decentralized leveraged perpetual trading platform that has recently launched on Solana, continuing its leading trading product position in the EVM ecosystem.

GMX-Solana is a slightly modified version of GMX V2, specifically optimized for the Solana blockchain. Users can engage in leveraged trading, provide liquidity, and swap tokens. It introduced a unique feature at launch—the Trade-to-Mint mode, where traders receive GT tokens based on the transaction fees paid. These GT tokens can be redeemed for stablecoins through the treasury to offset users' trading costs.

The GT token's economic model is similar to Bitcoin: the more GT tokens in circulation, the higher the price and the increased minting difficulty. Additionally, once the minted GT tokens exceed 82.53 million, GMX-Solana may conduct a GT token generation event (TGE) upon governance approval.

Liquidity providers can choose to provide liquidity to the Global Liquidity Vault (GLV) or the GM pool.

The GLV consists of SOL/USDC and dynamically adjusts liquidity to support various synthetic markets based on SOL/USDC, while GM is a standalone pool suitable for LPs seeking exposure to specific assets.

As of now, GMX-Solana's total trading volume has exceeded $2.4 billion, with a TVL of approximately $6.5 million.

1.2 Jupiter

Jupiter is a spot aggregator on Solana and one of the largest on-chain leveraged trading platforms, relying on its product Jupiter Perpetuals to provide perpetual contract trading services.

Similar to GMX-Solana, Jupiter adopts a pool-based design, where the liquidity pool acts as the counterparty to traders. In this design, the liquidity pool profits when traders lose money, and vice versa.

Jupiter allows traders to open positions with up to 100x leverage on major assets such as SOL, ETH, and wBTC. In the Jupiter perpetual contract, long positions are collateralized by tokens identical to the index asset, while short positions are collateralized by stablecoins to ensure efficient settlement.

Liquidity providers supply liquidity through JLP, which operates similarly to GMX-Solana's GLV. JLP consists of five major assets: SOL, ETH, wBTC, USDC, and USDT.

Currently, the JLP has a market value of approximately $1.4 billion, equivalent to the total liquidity available for the Jupiter perpetual contract. The platform's total trading volume has exceeded $268 billion.

1.3 Drift

Drift is also one of the largest on-chain perpetual contract exchanges on Solana. Since the launch of the V2 version, the platform's TVL has approached $9 billion, with a total trading volume of $592 billion.

Drift offers trading with up to 20x leverage and supports liquidity provision, spot trading, and a lending market.

Drift adopts a Hybrid Design, leveraging multiple channels to source liquidity to ensure efficient trade execution, deep liquidity, and a robust profit and loss settlement mechanism.

Its liquidity sources include:

· Just-In-Time Auction (JIT): Managed by market makers (MMs) to match orders in a short-term auction format;

· On-chain Orderbook: Managed by off-chain bots interacting with AMMs to provide liquidity for orders;

· Automated Market Makers: A liquidity pool containing various assets used to match trades.

Liquidity providers can contribute to multiple channels, including Strategy Vaults, Insurance Funds, Lending Pools, and Backup AMM Liquidity (BAL). Liquidity from the lending pool can be used not only for borrowing but also as collateral to open trading positions, attracting more traders due to this flexibility.

In addition, Drift incentivizes traders through the FUEL token, where users earn FUEL by creating trading volume on the platform, which can then be exchanged for the platform governance token $DRIFT.

2. Comparative Analysis

This section will cover all the above platforms and compare their KPIs.

To provide a good perpetual contract trading experience, a DEX needs to meet the following criteria:


· Low fees (opening/closing fees & swap fees)
· Excellent UI/UX (fast RPC and backend servers)
· Low-latency price oracle/anti-manipulation mechanism (to avoid malicious liquidation)
· High liquidity (to reduce slippage)
· Convenient collateral methods & multi-market support (to enhance trading flexibility)

2.1 GMX-Solana

· Fees: Opening/closing and swapping fees are approximately 4-7 bps (0.04%-0.07%), with the specific rate depending on the impact on the market balance of the trading pair. If the trade improves market balance, the fee is lower; if it exacerbates market imbalance, the fee is higher. Currently, traders can also offset some fees through the GT token incentives.

· Oracle: Uses @Chainlink to provide price data.

· RPC Service: Adopts @Heliuslabs, an industry standard.

· Market Support: Supports 25+ markets, including BTC, ETH, SOL, DOGE, etc., where users can trade long and short, and can use various tokens as collateral (depending on pool liquidity).

2.2 Jupiter Perps

· Fees: Opening/closing fees are fixed at 6 bps (0.06%).

· UI/UX: Jupiter Perps is part of the Jupiter spot aggregator, with a user-friendly interface and easy operation.

· Market Support: Currently only supports SOL-PERP, ETH-PERP, WBTC-PERP, with limited tradable assets.

· Oracle: Similar to GMX-Solana, relies on external price oracles for data.

2.3 Drift

· UI/UX: Compared to other platforms, Drift offers more features, resulting in a relatively more complex interface.

· Fee: The fee rate ranges from 3bps to 10bps (0.03% to 0.1%), with the specific rate depending on the user's tier (based on 30-day trading volume & the amount of $DRIFT staked in the Insurance Fund).

· Market Support: Offers 50+ perpetual contract trading pairs, far exceeding GMX-Solana and Jupiter Perps.

· Risk Management: Drift categorizes perpetual contracts by risk level and determines which trading pairs can utilize the Insurance Fund to protect LPs from losses.

· Oracle: Utilizes price data from @PythNetwork and @Switchboardxyz.

3. Liquidity & Trading Volume

Liquidity is crucial for any perpetual contract exchange. As the on-chain derivatives market grows, the liquidity and trading volume of these platforms continue to rise.

Perpetual Contract Protocol TVL on Solana

7-Day TVL and Trading Volume Moving Average

Due to the significant differences in TVL and trading volume among these protocols, a better comparison metric is Capital Efficiency, typically measured by Trading Volume (24H) / TVL. This value reflects how efficiently the protocol's TVL is utilized on exchanges, indicating how much capital generates fees and liquidity provider revenue through trading. If capital is not fully utilized, the efficiency is lower.

A higher value indicates higher liquidity efficiency for the protocol. While this value fluctuates based on market conditions and trader interest, a Capital Efficiency above 1 is generally considered ideal.

Currently, GMX-Solana has a Capital Efficiency of around 0.59, while Jupiter and Drift are 0.38 and 0.15, respectively. GMX has higher Capital Efficiency than Jupiter and Drift, in part due to its lower current liquidity.

Furthermore, when calculating Drift's Capital Efficiency, we excluded the platform's Strategic Vaults TVL since these vaults' funds may not be directly used for trading. However, this capital is still included in Drift's total TVL.

Please note: To avoid data skew due to daily performance and market fluctuations, the above calculation uses the 7-day trading volume moving average / 7-day TVL moving average as the formula for capital efficiency.

7-Day TVL and Fee Moving Average

Another metric that can be analyzed is Fee (24H) / TVL, calculated as the 7-day fee moving average / 7-day TVL moving average. This value indicates how much of the protocol's fees are generated through locked liquidity.

For GMX-Solana, this value is 0.0002, for Jupiter it is 0.00097, and for Drift it is 0.00003.


In this metric, Jupiter has the highest fee generation proportion compared to locked value.

3.1 GMX-Solana


GMX-Solana obtains liquidity from the GLV (Global Liquidity Vault) and GM Pool. The GLV pool is yield-optimized and rebalanced according to market conditions, with liquidity allocated based on demand. Not all markets source liquidity from GLV. On the other hand, the GM Pool is an isolated pool for users looking to focus on specific assets. These pools earn fees through perpetual trading and spot markets. Currently, GLV provides approximately a 6% APY.

Most of the platform's active liquidity comes from GLV, as the APY for specific GM Pools is much lower, usually in the range of 1-5%, with thinner liquidity.

Furthermore, due to insufficient liquidity, waning trader interest, and market volatility, GMX-Solana has not been able to capture most of the on-chain trading volume on Solana.

GMX-Solana's TVL

GMX-Solana's Daily Trading Volume

3.2 Jupiter Perp


The liquidity of Jupiter Perp comes from the JLP token, which is an index fund consisting of SOL, ETH, wBTC, USDC, and USDT. JLP accrues value from the fees generated by Jupiter Perps. JLP is an excellent choice for liquidity providers as it offers flexibility to easily provide or remove liquidity.

At the time of writing, JLP offers a 10% annualized yield.

Jupiter Perp TVL

3.3 Drift


Drift's liquidity comes from multiple channels as described in the overview section. Since users can provide liquidity in different ways, the annualized yield varies for each method.


The platform offers a maximum APY of 338% through Strategic Vaults managed by external parties. Other pools, including lending pools and insurance funds, offer a 10-15% APY.

LPs can also provide liquidity through BAL, where they automatically take the other side of trades for traders and earn fees from the market's funding rate. Additionally, 80% of the collected taker fees are distributed to BAL providers, allowing them to achieve an annualized yield of 10-25%, depending on the market they provide liquidity to.

Drift Daily Trading Volume

4. Risk Management

Risk management is crucial in every perpetual contract exchange. Although risks associated with smart contracts may still exist, an ideal risk management protocol should be able to efficiently settle positions in highly volatile market conditions and minimize damage to liquidity providers.

4.1 GMX-Solana

GMX-Solana has two types of markets: Fully Collateralized Market and Synthetic Market.

Each GMX-Solana market contains 3 tokens:

· Index Token

· Long Token

· Short Token

The Long and Short tokens collectively back the market. The Long token backs long positions, while the Short token is typically a stablecoin backing short positions.

The Index Token is the token users use to go long or short. However, it is worth noting that GMX-Solana also supports markets where only one token is collateralized, which may pose risk to short positions.

When the Long token is the same as the Index token, the market is fully collateralized, meaning traders' gains and losses can settle quickly in highly volatile market conditions. In Synthetic markets, when the Long and Index tokens differ, this can lead to settlement issues during high volatility.

To ensure efficient settlement of gains and losses, GMX-Solana employs an Auto Deleveraging (ADL) mechanism, which partially or fully closes certain profitable positions to maintain market solvency.

To manage risk, protect liquidity providers, and maintain pool balance, several fees are involved, including:

· Price Impact Fee: Fee paid when LPs or traders cause imbalance in the pool

· Dynamic Lending Fee: Fee paid by traders to LPs for borrowing assets from the liquidity pool

· Funding Fee: Fee incentivizing the other side of the market to trade in the opposite direction

These fees are crucial for incentivizing liquidity providers and protecting the exchange in case of solvency issues.

4.2 Jupiter Perps

Jupiter Perps operates similarly to GMX-Solana, with the only difference being that it does not allow synthetic markets where the Long Backing Token differs from the Index Token. This further safeguards the exchange and positions to maintain stability even in highly volatile conditions.

4.3 Drift

Drift approaches things differently as it utilizes a hybrid liquidity model. Drift utilizes an insurance fund to manage risk and efficiently maintain the exchange's solvency. The insurance fund accrues funds from protocol revenue, liquidations, and trading fees. Since BAL is an Automated Market Maker (AMM), LPs may be prevented from burning their shares when pool imbalance occurs.

5. Current Status and Future Trends

Currently, most of the derivatives liquidity is concentrated on Solana, with Jupiter and Drift being the main contributors. As of now, Solana represents approximately 52% of the total on-chain derivatives liquidity, around $27 billion out of a total liquidity of $52 billion.

7-Day Trading Volume: Solana Perpetual Contracts Platform

Currently, Jupiter leads in the trading volume of Solana perpetual contracts, followed by Drift. GMX-Solana still has a long way to go in challenging the existing market competitors.

DEX to CEX Futures Trading Volume, Source: The Block

The on-chain derivatives market is thriving, with increasing competition between protocols that have introduced many excellent products. The DEX to CEX trading volume ratio is on the rise, currently around 7%, indicating significant room for future growth.

Top Ten Blockchains by 1-Month Trading Volume

Solana is the second-largest blockchain in terms of trading volume in the on-chain derivatives space. Hyperliquid's volume lags significantly behind other chains. As the industry progresses and Solana protocols introduce better features and incentives, this gap is expected to narrow. Through the increased throughput provided by the Firedancer validation client, the Solana protocol can achieve speed and efficiency comparable to its competitors.

6. Conclusion

Jupiter and Drift have shown a consistent growth pattern but lack capital efficiency. While GMX-Solana has a slight edge in capital efficiency, partly due to lower liquidity, there is still work to be done to catch up.

Jupiter drives simplicity through its JLP token, allowing LPs to purchase and hold JLP to provide liquidity to the platform. While GMX and Jupiter follow similar patterns in handling transactions, their approach to liquidity differs, with little similarity between GLV and JLP.

Drift provides advanced traders seeking better risk allocation with a cross-margin account. It allows for lower leverage and focuses on risk management through incentivized insurance funds.

Currently, the DEX-to-CEX derivatives trading volume ratio is at a historical high. As Solana is a key liquidity provider in the on-chain derivatives market, its ecosystem will benefit from the volume generated in this sector.

Original Article Link

You may also like

Token Cannot Compound, Where Is the Real Investment Opportunity?

The next chapter in the crypto industry will undoubtedly be written by Crypto-empowered Stocks.

February 6th Market Key Intelligence, How Much Did You Miss?

1. On-chain Flows: $508.2M USD inflow to Ethereum today; $390.8M USD outflow from Arbitrum 2. Biggest Gainers/Losers: $HBTC, $AIO 3. Top News: Current Bitcoin weekly RSI oversold signal comparable to June 2022

China's Central Bank and Eight Other Departments' Latest Regulatory Focus: Key Attention to RWA Tokenized Asset Risk


Foreword: Today, the People's Bank of China's website published the "Notice of the People's Bank of China, National Development and Reform Commission, Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, Ministry of Public Security, State Administration for Market Regulation, China Banking and Insurance Regulatory Commission, China Securities Regulatory Commission, State Administration of Foreign Exchange on Further Preventing and Dealing with Risks Related to Virtual Currency and Others (Yinfa [2026] No. 42)", the latest regulatory requirements from the eight departments including the central bank, which are basically consistent with the regulatory requirements of recent years. The main focus of the regulation is on speculative activities such as virtual currency trading, exchanges, ICOs, overseas platform services, and this time, regulatory oversight of RWA has been added, explicitly prohibiting RWA tokenization, stablecoins (especially those pegged to the RMB). The following is the full text:


To the people's governments of all provinces, autonomous regions, and municipalities directly under the Central Government, the Xinjiang Production and Construction Corps:


  Recently, there have been speculative activities related to virtual currency and Real-World Assets (RWA) tokenization, disrupting the economic and financial order and jeopardizing the property security of the people. In order to further prevent and address the risks related to virtual currency and Real-World Assets tokenization, effectively safeguard national security and social stability, in accordance with the "Law of the People's Republic of China on the People's Bank of China," "Law of the People's Republic of China on Commercial Banks," "Securities Law of the People's Republic of China," "Law of the People's Republic of China on Securities Investment Funds," "Law of the People's Republic of China on Futures and Derivatives," "Cybersecurity Law of the People's Republic of China," "Regulations of the People's Republic of China on the Administration of Renminbi," "Regulations on Prevention and Disposal of Illegal Fundraising," "Regulations of the People's Republic of China on Foreign Exchange Administration," "Telecommunications Regulations of the People's Republic of China," and other provisions, after reaching consensus with the Cyberspace Administration of China, the Supreme People's Court, and the Supreme People's Procuratorate, and with the approval of the State Council, the relevant matters are notified as follows:


  I. Clarify the essential attributes of virtual currency, Real-World Assets tokenization, and related business activities


  (I) Virtual currency does not possess the legal status equivalent to fiat currency. Virtual currencies such as Bitcoin, Ether, Tether, etc., have the main characteristics of being issued by non-monetary authorities, using encryption technology and distributed ledger or similar technology, existing in digital form, etc. They do not have legal tender status, should not and cannot be circulated and used as currency in the market.


  The business activities related to virtual currency are classified as illegal financial activities. The exchange of fiat currency and virtual currency within the territory, exchange of virtual currencies, acting as a central counterparty in buying and selling virtual currencies, providing information intermediary and pricing services for virtual currency transactions, token issuance financing, and trading of virtual currency-related financial products, etc., fall under illegal financial activities, such as suspected illegal issuance of token vouchers, unauthorized public issuance of securities, illegal operation of securities and futures business, illegal fundraising, etc., are strictly prohibited across the board and resolutely banned in accordance with the law. Overseas entities and individuals are not allowed to provide virtual currency-related services to domestic entities in any form.


  A stablecoin pegged to a fiat currency indirectly fulfills some functions of the fiat currency in circulation. Without the consent of relevant authorities in accordance with the law and regulations, any domestic or foreign entity or individual is not allowed to issue a RMB-pegged stablecoin overseas.


(II)Tokenization of Real-World Assets refers to the use of encryption technology and distributed ledger or similar technologies to transform ownership rights, income rights, etc., of assets into tokens (tokens) or other interests or bond certificates with token (token) characteristics, and carry out issuance and trading activities.


  Engaging in the tokenization of real-world assets domestically, as well as providing related intermediary, information technology services, etc., which are suspected of illegal issuance of token vouchers, unauthorized public offering of securities, illegal operation of securities and futures business, illegal fundraising, and other illegal financial activities, shall be prohibited; except for relevant business activities carried out with the approval of the competent authorities in accordance with the law and regulations and relying on specific financial infrastructures. Overseas entities and individuals are not allowed to illegally provide services related to the tokenization of real-world assets to domestic entities in any form.


  II. Sound Work Mechanism


  (III) Inter-agency Coordination. The People's Bank of China, together with the National Development and Reform Commission, the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, the Ministry of Public Security, the State Administration for Market Regulation, the China Banking and Insurance Regulatory Commission, the China Securities Regulatory Commission, the State Administration of Foreign Exchange, and other departments, will improve the work mechanism, strengthen coordination with the Cyberspace Administration of China, the Supreme People's Court, and the Supreme People's Procuratorate, coordinate efforts, and overall guide regions to carry out risk prevention and disposal of virtual currency-related illegal financial activities.


  The China Securities Regulatory Commission, together with the National Development and Reform Commission, the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, the Ministry of Public Security, the People's Bank of China, the State Administration for Market Regulation, the China Banking and Insurance Regulatory Commission, the State Administration of Foreign Exchange, and other departments, will improve the work mechanism, strengthen coordination with the Cyberspace Administration of China, the Supreme People's Court, and the Supreme People's Procuratorate, coordinate efforts, and overall guide regions to carry out risk prevention and disposal of illegal financial activities related to the tokenization of real-world assets.


  (IV) Strengthening Local Implementation. The people's governments at the provincial level are overall responsible for the prevention and disposal of risks related to virtual currencies and the tokenization of real-world assets in their respective administrative regions. The specific leading department is the local financial regulatory department, with participation from branches and dispatched institutions of the State Council's financial regulatory department, telecommunications regulators, public security, market supervision, and other departments, in coordination with cyberspace departments, courts, and procuratorates, to improve the normalization of the work mechanism, effectively connect with the relevant work mechanisms of central departments, form a cooperative and coordinated working pattern between central and local governments, effectively prevent and properly handle risks related to virtual currencies and the tokenization of real-world assets, and maintain economic and financial order and social stability.


  III. Strengthened Risk Monitoring, Prevention, and Disposal


  (5) Enhanced Risk Monitoring. The People's Bank of China, China Securities Regulatory Commission, National Development and Reform Commission, Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, Ministry of Public Security, State Administration of Foreign Exchange, Cyberspace Administration of China, and other departments continue to improve monitoring techniques and system support, enhance cross-departmental data analysis and sharing, establish sound information sharing and cross-validation mechanisms, promptly grasp the risk situation of activities related to virtual currency and real-world asset tokenization. Local governments at all levels give full play to the role of local monitoring and early warning mechanisms. Local financial regulatory authorities, together with branches and agencies of the State Council's financial regulatory authorities, as well as departments of cyberspace and public security, ensure effective connection between online monitoring, offline investigation, and fund tracking, efficiently and accurately identify activities related to virtual currency and real-world asset tokenization, promptly share risk information, improve early warning information dissemination, verification, and rapid response mechanisms.


  (6) Strengthened Oversight of Financial Institutions, Intermediaries, and Technology Service Providers. Financial institutions (including non-bank payment institutions) are prohibited from providing account opening, fund transfer, and clearing services for virtual currency-related business activities, issuing and selling financial products related to virtual currency, including virtual currency and related financial products in the scope of collateral, conducting insurance business related to virtual currency, or including virtual currency in the scope of insurance liability. Financial institutions (including non-bank payment institutions) are prohibited from providing custody, clearing, and settlement services for unauthorized real-world asset tokenization-related business and related financial products. Relevant intermediary institutions and information technology service providers are prohibited from providing intermediary, technical, or other services for unauthorized real-world asset tokenization-related businesses and related financial products.


  (7) Enhanced Management of Internet Information Content and Access. Internet enterprises are prohibited from providing online business venues, commercial displays, marketing, advertising, or paid traffic diversion services for virtual currency and real-world asset tokenization-related business activities. Upon discovering clues of illegal activities, they should promptly report to relevant departments and provide technical support and assistance for related investigations and inquiries. Based on the clues transferred by the financial regulatory authorities, the cyberspace administration, telecommunications authorities, and public security departments should promptly close and deal with websites, mobile applications (including mini-programs), and public accounts engaged in virtual currency and real-world asset tokenization-related business activities in accordance with the law.


  (8) Strengthened Entity Registration and Advertisement Management. Market supervision departments strengthen entity registration and management, and enterprise and individual business registrations must not contain terms such as "virtual currency," "virtual asset," "cryptocurrency," "crypto asset," "stablecoin," "real-world asset tokenization," or "RWA" in their names or business scopes. Market supervision departments, together with financial regulatory authorities, legally enhance the supervision of advertisements related to virtual currency and real-world asset tokenization, promptly investigating and handling relevant illegal advertisements.


  (IX) Continued Rectification of Virtual Currency Mining Activities. The National Development and Reform Commission, together with relevant departments, strictly controls virtual currency mining activities, continuously promotes the rectification of virtual currency mining activities. The people's governments of various provinces take overall responsibility for the rectification of "mining" within their respective administrative regions. In accordance with the requirements of the National Development and Reform Commission and other departments in the "Notice on the Rectification of Virtual Currency Mining Activities" (NDRC Energy-saving Building [2021] No. 1283) and the provisions of the "Guidance Catalog for Industrial Structure Adjustment (2024 Edition)," a comprehensive review, investigation, and closure of existing virtual currency mining projects are conducted, new mining projects are strictly prohibited, and mining machine production enterprises are strictly prohibited from providing mining machine sales and other services within the country.


  (X) Severe Crackdown on Related Illegal Financial Activities. Upon discovering clues to illegal financial activities related to virtual currency and the tokenization of real-world assets, local financial regulatory authorities, branches of the State Council's financial regulatory authorities, and other relevant departments promptly investigate, determine, and properly handle the issues in accordance with the law, and seriously hold the relevant entities and individuals legally responsible. Those suspected of crimes are transferred to the judicial authorities for processing according to the law.


 (XI) Severe Crackdown on Related Illegal and Criminal Activities. The Ministry of Public Security, the People's Bank of China, the State Administration for Market Regulation, the China Banking and Insurance Regulatory Commission, the China Securities Regulatory Commission, as well as judicial and procuratorial organs, in accordance with their respective responsibilities, rigorously crack down on illegal and criminal activities related to virtual currency, the tokenization of real-world assets, such as fraud, money laundering, illegal business operations, pyramid schemes, illegal fundraising, and other illegal and criminal activities carried out under the guise of virtual currency, the tokenization of real-world assets, etc.


  (XII) Strengthen Industry Self-discipline. Relevant industry associations should enhance membership management and policy advocacy, based on their own responsibilities, advocate and urge member units to resist illegal financial activities related to virtual currency and the tokenization of real-world assets. Member units that violate regulatory policies and industry self-discipline rules are to be disciplined in accordance with relevant self-regulatory management regulations. By leveraging various industry infrastructure, conduct risk monitoring related to virtual currency, the tokenization of real-world assets, and promptly transfer issue clues to relevant departments.


  IV. Strict Supervision of Domestic Entities Engaging in Overseas Business Activities


(XIII) Without the approval of relevant departments in accordance with the law and regulations, domestic entities and foreign entities controlled by them may not issue virtual currency overseas.


  (XIV) Domestic entities engaging directly or indirectly in overseas external debt-based tokenization of real-world assets, or conducting asset securitization activities abroad based on domestic ownership rights, income rights, etc. (hereinafter referred to as domestic equity), should be strictly regulated in accordance with the principles of "same business, same risk, same rules." The National Development and Reform Commission, the China Securities Regulatory Commission, the State Administration of Foreign Exchange, and other relevant departments regulate it according to their respective responsibilities. For other forms of overseas real-world asset tokenization activities based on domestic equity by domestic entities, the China Securities Regulatory Commission, together with relevant departments, supervise according to their division of responsibilities. Without the consent and filing of relevant departments, no unit or individual may engage in the above-mentioned business.


  (15) Overseas subsidiaries and branches of domestic financial institutions providing Real World Asset Tokenization-related services overseas shall do so legally and prudently. They shall have professional personnel and systems in place to effectively mitigate business risks, strictly implement customer onboarding, suitability management, anti-money laundering requirements, and incorporate them into the domestic financial institutions' compliance and risk management system. Intermediaries and information technology service providers offering Real World Asset Tokenization services abroad based on domestic equity or conducting Real World Asset Tokenization business in the form of overseas debt for domestic entities directly or indirectly venturing abroad must strictly comply with relevant laws and regulations. They should establish and improve relevant compliance and internal control systems in accordance with relevant normative requirements, strengthen business and risk control, and report the business developments to the relevant regulatory authorities for approval or filing.


  V. Strengthen Organizational Implementation


  (16) Strengthen organizational leadership and overall coordination. All departments and regions should attach great importance to the prevention of risks related to virtual currencies and Real World Asset Tokenization, strengthen organizational leadership, clarify work responsibilities, form a long-term effective working mechanism with centralized coordination, local implementation, and shared responsibilities, maintain high pressure, dynamically monitor risks, effectively prevent and mitigate risks in an orderly and efficient manner, legally protect the property security of the people, and make every effort to maintain economic and financial order and social stability.


  (17) Widely carry out publicity and education. All departments, regions, and industry associations should make full use of various media and other communication channels to disseminate information through legal and policy interpretation, analysis of typical cases, and education on investment risks, etc. They should promote the illegality and harm of virtual currencies and Real World Asset Tokenization-related businesses and their manifestations, fully alert to potential risks and hidden dangers, and enhance public awareness and identification capabilities for risk prevention.


  VI. Legal Responsibility


  (18) Engaging in illegal financial activities related to virtual currencies and Real World Asset Tokenization in violation of this notice, as well as providing services for virtual currencies and Real World Asset Tokenization-related businesses, shall be punished in accordance with relevant regulations. If it constitutes a crime, criminal liability shall be pursued according to the law. For domestic entities and individuals who knowingly or should have known that overseas entities illegally provided virtual currency or Real World Asset Tokenization-related services to domestic entities and still assisted them, relevant responsibilities shall be pursued according to the law. If it constitutes a crime, criminal liability shall be pursued according to the law.


  (19) If any unit or individual invests in virtual currencies, Real World Asset Tokens, and related financial products against public order and good customs, the relevant civil legal actions shall be invalid, and any resulting losses shall be borne by them. If there are suspicions of disrupting financial order and jeopardizing financial security, the relevant departments shall deal with them according to the law.


  This notice shall enter into force upon the date of its issuance. The People's Bank of China and ten other departments' "Notice on Further Preventing and Dealing with the Risks of Virtual Currency Trading Speculation" (Yinfa [2021] No. 237) is hereby repealed.


Former Partner's Perspective on Multicoin: Kyle's Exit, But the Game He Left Behind Just Getting Started

Kyle knew his game, so he decided to focus on playing the game he was good at and interested in.

Why Bitcoin Is Falling Now: The Real Reasons Behind BTC's Crash & WEEX's Smart Profit Playbook

Bitcoin's ongoing crash explained: Discover the 5 hidden triggers behind BTC's plunge & how WEEX's Auto Earn and Trade to Earn strategies help traders profit from crypto market volatility.

Wall Street's Hottest Trades See Exodus

This time there is no single triggering factor, but rather market anxiety about asset valuation, with many already skeptical of these valuations being too high, leading to investors choosing to retreat almost simultaneously.

Popular coins

Latest Crypto News

Read more