The Accelerating Implementation of Stablecoin Bills in the US and Hong Kong

By: crypto insight|2026/01/05 15:30:06
0
Share
copy

Key Takeaways

  • The United States Senate and the Hong Kong Legislative Council have both advanced legislation pertaining to the regulation of stablecoins.
  • The GENIUS Stablecoin Bill in the US and the Stablecoin Regulation Bill in Hong Kong mark significant steps in clarifying regulatory frameworks for digital currencies.
  • Major US banks are exploring joint ventures to issue stablecoins, highlighting increasing interest from traditional financial institutions.
  • Hong Kong is becoming an attractive hub for virtual asset services, partially due to policies supporting Mainland Chinese companies’ global expansion.
  • FRAX has emerged as a notable entity in the dialogue concerning stablecoin regulation, potentially influencing the GENIUS Bill’s outcomes.

WEEX Crypto News, 2026-01-05 07:18:20

Stablecoins, often seen as a bridge between the traditional financial system and the burgeoning world of cryptocurrencies, are gaining serious attention from regulators around the globe. In particular, recent developments in the United States and Hong Kong signal a novel and transformative approach to digital currency regulation. This movement is closely monitored by market participants and institutions, as it may define the future trajectory of the global cryptocurrency landscape.

Contextualizing the Stablecoin Bill in Hong Kong

Hong Kong has long been recognized as a financial powerhouse. Its strategic position as a gateway to Mainland China has made it an attractive destination for businesses seeking expansion in Asia. With the passage of the Stablecoin Regulation Bill by the Hong Kong Legislative Council, the city is reinforcing its commitment to becoming a central hub for digital assets. The legislation, passed in its third reading, allows institutions to apply for compliant issuance by the end of the current year. It’s a major stride in the city’s efforts to attract global virtual asset service providers (VASPs) and tech companies.

According to Stephen Phillips, Director-General of Invest Hong Kong, discussions are underway with several VASPs to establish their operations in the city. This initiative aligns with Beijing’s policy of promoting Chinese companies’ presence in global markets. Over recent years, a significant influx of Mainland Chinese companies has been noted, with roughly 48% of new enterprises in Hong Kong originating from Mainland China. This trend is expected to continue, supported by the new regulatory framework for stablecoins.

United States’ Progress with the GENIUS Bill

Simultaneously in the United States, the Senate’s GENIUS Stablecoin Bill is stirring discussions. This legislation is poised to set a comprehensive regulatory framework governing the issuance and use of stablecoins across America. Its passage is seen as a critical point in aligning national standards with the fast-evolving digital currency market.

The bipartisan support for the bill, as reflected by the 69-to-31 vote, underscores a shared understanding of the need for regulatory clarity in this space. Despite the strong support, debate remains fierce. The potential financial implications for influential figures, including former President Donald Trump, have become focal points of contention. Amendments proposed aim to prevent undue profits from political affiliations in the realm of digital currencies. Senators Warren, Schumer, and Merkley have been particularly vocal, advocating for changes that ensure transparency and ethical governance.

A notable feature of the GENIUS Act is its clear delineation of what constitutes a “payment stablecoin,” intentionally excluding such instruments from being classified as securities or commodities. This specificity is crucial in guiding businesses and preventing legal ambiguities.

The Role of Major US Banks

Recognizing the transformative potential of stablecoin technologies, several renowned US financial institutions are embarking on exploratory projects of their own. JPMorgan Chase, Bank of America, Citigroup, and Wells Fargo have shown interest in a joint issuance of a stablecoin. Collaborations with payment networks like Early Warning Services and the Clearing House are part of this strategy. Such initiatives are indicative of the banking sector’s acknowledgment of digital currencies as a component of the future financial ecosystem.

FRAX’s Influence on the Stablecoin Discussion

Within the broader dialogue surrounding stablecoin regulations, FRAX, a decentralized algorithmic stablecoin protocol, has garnered attention. Sam Kazemian, FRAX Finance’s founder, is rumored to have significantly contributed to the drafting and discussions of the GENIUS Bill. This involvement underlines the increasingly influential role smaller, innovative financial technologies can play in shaping policy. FRAX’s integration into discussions reflects a shift towards embracing diverse and new financial models, challenging traditional interpretations of money and value.

Anticipating the Impact of Stablecoin Regulations

As both Hong Kong and the United States move forward with regulatory frameworks, the potential implications for the cryptocurrency industry are profound. These legislative efforts not only address existing concerns about security, anti-money laundering, and consumer protection but also provide a roadmap for the legal operation of stablecoins.

For Hong Kong, these changes emphasize its intention to maintain a cutting-edge financial landscape, attract global enterprises, and solidify its standing as a significant player in the digital economy. Meanwhile, in the US, the GENIUS Bill’s focus on fostering innovation while ensuring regulation offers a balanced approach that might inspire other nations to draft their own frameworks.

The embrace of stablecoins by major financial institutions, as seen in the US, further validates their relevance and the necessity for an appropriate regulatory environment. Such acknowledgments reflect a turning tide where digital currencies are perceived not as threats but as extensions of traditional finance, with the possibility of improving transactional efficiencies.

Looking Ahead: The Future of Stablecoins

As the narrative around stablecoins continues to evolve, both opportunistic and cautionary tales emerge. The regulatory milestones in Hong Kong and the US exemplify a global move towards acknowledging digital currencies as an integral part of the financial architecture. This realization prompts governments and industry leaders to seek harmonized approaches, mitigating risks while maximizing innovation benefits.

With the groundwork laid, both regions are positioned to lead in the crafting of digital currency standards. These actions align not just with immediate economic goals but also with broader visions of financial inclusivity, technological advancement, and global competitiveness.

Ultimately, as the ramifications of these regulations unfold, they will likely redefine the dynamics of the cryptocurrency market. Encouraging compliant behavior, safeguarding consumer interests, and fostering collaboration between traditional and digital finance entities will become key pillars in this transformative process.

FAQ

What is the GENIUS Stablecoin Bill in the US?

The GENIUS Stablecoin Bill is proposed US legislation aimed at establishing a regulatory framework for the issuance and use of stablecoins, excluding them from being classified as securities or commodities.

How does Hong Kong’s Stablecoin Regulation Bill impact global companies?

The bill allows global companies to apply for compliant issuance of stablecoins in Hong Kong, making it an attractive hub for companies seeking a reliable regulatory environment for digital assets.

Why are US banks interested in stablecoins?

Major US banks are exploring stablecoins due to their potential to improve transactional efficiencies and respond to growing competition within the cryptocurrency industry.

What role did FRAX play in the GENIUS Bill discussion?

FRAX Finance’s founder was reportedly involved in discussions around the GENIUS Bill, demonstrating the influence of decentralized finance protocols in shaping legislative frameworks.

What are the next steps following the passage of the stablecoin bills?

After these bills are enacted, regulatory bodies will likely develop further guidelines for implementation, while companies will begin adjusting their operations to comply with new standards.

You may also like

Token Cannot Compound, Where Is the Real Investment Opportunity?

The next chapter in the crypto industry will undoubtedly be written by Crypto-empowered Stocks.

February 6th Market Key Intelligence, How Much Did You Miss?

1. On-chain Flows: $508.2M USD inflow to Ethereum today; $390.8M USD outflow from Arbitrum 2. Biggest Gainers/Losers: $HBTC, $AIO 3. Top News: Current Bitcoin weekly RSI oversold signal comparable to June 2022

China's Central Bank and Eight Other Departments' Latest Regulatory Focus: Key Attention to RWA Tokenized Asset Risk


Foreword: Today, the People's Bank of China's website published the "Notice of the People's Bank of China, National Development and Reform Commission, Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, Ministry of Public Security, State Administration for Market Regulation, China Banking and Insurance Regulatory Commission, China Securities Regulatory Commission, State Administration of Foreign Exchange on Further Preventing and Dealing with Risks Related to Virtual Currency and Others (Yinfa [2026] No. 42)", the latest regulatory requirements from the eight departments including the central bank, which are basically consistent with the regulatory requirements of recent years. The main focus of the regulation is on speculative activities such as virtual currency trading, exchanges, ICOs, overseas platform services, and this time, regulatory oversight of RWA has been added, explicitly prohibiting RWA tokenization, stablecoins (especially those pegged to the RMB). The following is the full text:


To the people's governments of all provinces, autonomous regions, and municipalities directly under the Central Government, the Xinjiang Production and Construction Corps:


  Recently, there have been speculative activities related to virtual currency and Real-World Assets (RWA) tokenization, disrupting the economic and financial order and jeopardizing the property security of the people. In order to further prevent and address the risks related to virtual currency and Real-World Assets tokenization, effectively safeguard national security and social stability, in accordance with the "Law of the People's Republic of China on the People's Bank of China," "Law of the People's Republic of China on Commercial Banks," "Securities Law of the People's Republic of China," "Law of the People's Republic of China on Securities Investment Funds," "Law of the People's Republic of China on Futures and Derivatives," "Cybersecurity Law of the People's Republic of China," "Regulations of the People's Republic of China on the Administration of Renminbi," "Regulations on Prevention and Disposal of Illegal Fundraising," "Regulations of the People's Republic of China on Foreign Exchange Administration," "Telecommunications Regulations of the People's Republic of China," and other provisions, after reaching consensus with the Cyberspace Administration of China, the Supreme People's Court, and the Supreme People's Procuratorate, and with the approval of the State Council, the relevant matters are notified as follows:


  I. Clarify the essential attributes of virtual currency, Real-World Assets tokenization, and related business activities


  (I) Virtual currency does not possess the legal status equivalent to fiat currency. Virtual currencies such as Bitcoin, Ether, Tether, etc., have the main characteristics of being issued by non-monetary authorities, using encryption technology and distributed ledger or similar technology, existing in digital form, etc. They do not have legal tender status, should not and cannot be circulated and used as currency in the market.


  The business activities related to virtual currency are classified as illegal financial activities. The exchange of fiat currency and virtual currency within the territory, exchange of virtual currencies, acting as a central counterparty in buying and selling virtual currencies, providing information intermediary and pricing services for virtual currency transactions, token issuance financing, and trading of virtual currency-related financial products, etc., fall under illegal financial activities, such as suspected illegal issuance of token vouchers, unauthorized public issuance of securities, illegal operation of securities and futures business, illegal fundraising, etc., are strictly prohibited across the board and resolutely banned in accordance with the law. Overseas entities and individuals are not allowed to provide virtual currency-related services to domestic entities in any form.


  A stablecoin pegged to a fiat currency indirectly fulfills some functions of the fiat currency in circulation. Without the consent of relevant authorities in accordance with the law and regulations, any domestic or foreign entity or individual is not allowed to issue a RMB-pegged stablecoin overseas.


(II)Tokenization of Real-World Assets refers to the use of encryption technology and distributed ledger or similar technologies to transform ownership rights, income rights, etc., of assets into tokens (tokens) or other interests or bond certificates with token (token) characteristics, and carry out issuance and trading activities.


  Engaging in the tokenization of real-world assets domestically, as well as providing related intermediary, information technology services, etc., which are suspected of illegal issuance of token vouchers, unauthorized public offering of securities, illegal operation of securities and futures business, illegal fundraising, and other illegal financial activities, shall be prohibited; except for relevant business activities carried out with the approval of the competent authorities in accordance with the law and regulations and relying on specific financial infrastructures. Overseas entities and individuals are not allowed to illegally provide services related to the tokenization of real-world assets to domestic entities in any form.


  II. Sound Work Mechanism


  (III) Inter-agency Coordination. The People's Bank of China, together with the National Development and Reform Commission, the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, the Ministry of Public Security, the State Administration for Market Regulation, the China Banking and Insurance Regulatory Commission, the China Securities Regulatory Commission, the State Administration of Foreign Exchange, and other departments, will improve the work mechanism, strengthen coordination with the Cyberspace Administration of China, the Supreme People's Court, and the Supreme People's Procuratorate, coordinate efforts, and overall guide regions to carry out risk prevention and disposal of virtual currency-related illegal financial activities.


  The China Securities Regulatory Commission, together with the National Development and Reform Commission, the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, the Ministry of Public Security, the People's Bank of China, the State Administration for Market Regulation, the China Banking and Insurance Regulatory Commission, the State Administration of Foreign Exchange, and other departments, will improve the work mechanism, strengthen coordination with the Cyberspace Administration of China, the Supreme People's Court, and the Supreme People's Procuratorate, coordinate efforts, and overall guide regions to carry out risk prevention and disposal of illegal financial activities related to the tokenization of real-world assets.


  (IV) Strengthening Local Implementation. The people's governments at the provincial level are overall responsible for the prevention and disposal of risks related to virtual currencies and the tokenization of real-world assets in their respective administrative regions. The specific leading department is the local financial regulatory department, with participation from branches and dispatched institutions of the State Council's financial regulatory department, telecommunications regulators, public security, market supervision, and other departments, in coordination with cyberspace departments, courts, and procuratorates, to improve the normalization of the work mechanism, effectively connect with the relevant work mechanisms of central departments, form a cooperative and coordinated working pattern between central and local governments, effectively prevent and properly handle risks related to virtual currencies and the tokenization of real-world assets, and maintain economic and financial order and social stability.


  III. Strengthened Risk Monitoring, Prevention, and Disposal


  (5) Enhanced Risk Monitoring. The People's Bank of China, China Securities Regulatory Commission, National Development and Reform Commission, Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, Ministry of Public Security, State Administration of Foreign Exchange, Cyberspace Administration of China, and other departments continue to improve monitoring techniques and system support, enhance cross-departmental data analysis and sharing, establish sound information sharing and cross-validation mechanisms, promptly grasp the risk situation of activities related to virtual currency and real-world asset tokenization. Local governments at all levels give full play to the role of local monitoring and early warning mechanisms. Local financial regulatory authorities, together with branches and agencies of the State Council's financial regulatory authorities, as well as departments of cyberspace and public security, ensure effective connection between online monitoring, offline investigation, and fund tracking, efficiently and accurately identify activities related to virtual currency and real-world asset tokenization, promptly share risk information, improve early warning information dissemination, verification, and rapid response mechanisms.


  (6) Strengthened Oversight of Financial Institutions, Intermediaries, and Technology Service Providers. Financial institutions (including non-bank payment institutions) are prohibited from providing account opening, fund transfer, and clearing services for virtual currency-related business activities, issuing and selling financial products related to virtual currency, including virtual currency and related financial products in the scope of collateral, conducting insurance business related to virtual currency, or including virtual currency in the scope of insurance liability. Financial institutions (including non-bank payment institutions) are prohibited from providing custody, clearing, and settlement services for unauthorized real-world asset tokenization-related business and related financial products. Relevant intermediary institutions and information technology service providers are prohibited from providing intermediary, technical, or other services for unauthorized real-world asset tokenization-related businesses and related financial products.


  (7) Enhanced Management of Internet Information Content and Access. Internet enterprises are prohibited from providing online business venues, commercial displays, marketing, advertising, or paid traffic diversion services for virtual currency and real-world asset tokenization-related business activities. Upon discovering clues of illegal activities, they should promptly report to relevant departments and provide technical support and assistance for related investigations and inquiries. Based on the clues transferred by the financial regulatory authorities, the cyberspace administration, telecommunications authorities, and public security departments should promptly close and deal with websites, mobile applications (including mini-programs), and public accounts engaged in virtual currency and real-world asset tokenization-related business activities in accordance with the law.


  (8) Strengthened Entity Registration and Advertisement Management. Market supervision departments strengthen entity registration and management, and enterprise and individual business registrations must not contain terms such as "virtual currency," "virtual asset," "cryptocurrency," "crypto asset," "stablecoin," "real-world asset tokenization," or "RWA" in their names or business scopes. Market supervision departments, together with financial regulatory authorities, legally enhance the supervision of advertisements related to virtual currency and real-world asset tokenization, promptly investigating and handling relevant illegal advertisements.


  (IX) Continued Rectification of Virtual Currency Mining Activities. The National Development and Reform Commission, together with relevant departments, strictly controls virtual currency mining activities, continuously promotes the rectification of virtual currency mining activities. The people's governments of various provinces take overall responsibility for the rectification of "mining" within their respective administrative regions. In accordance with the requirements of the National Development and Reform Commission and other departments in the "Notice on the Rectification of Virtual Currency Mining Activities" (NDRC Energy-saving Building [2021] No. 1283) and the provisions of the "Guidance Catalog for Industrial Structure Adjustment (2024 Edition)," a comprehensive review, investigation, and closure of existing virtual currency mining projects are conducted, new mining projects are strictly prohibited, and mining machine production enterprises are strictly prohibited from providing mining machine sales and other services within the country.


  (X) Severe Crackdown on Related Illegal Financial Activities. Upon discovering clues to illegal financial activities related to virtual currency and the tokenization of real-world assets, local financial regulatory authorities, branches of the State Council's financial regulatory authorities, and other relevant departments promptly investigate, determine, and properly handle the issues in accordance with the law, and seriously hold the relevant entities and individuals legally responsible. Those suspected of crimes are transferred to the judicial authorities for processing according to the law.


 (XI) Severe Crackdown on Related Illegal and Criminal Activities. The Ministry of Public Security, the People's Bank of China, the State Administration for Market Regulation, the China Banking and Insurance Regulatory Commission, the China Securities Regulatory Commission, as well as judicial and procuratorial organs, in accordance with their respective responsibilities, rigorously crack down on illegal and criminal activities related to virtual currency, the tokenization of real-world assets, such as fraud, money laundering, illegal business operations, pyramid schemes, illegal fundraising, and other illegal and criminal activities carried out under the guise of virtual currency, the tokenization of real-world assets, etc.


  (XII) Strengthen Industry Self-discipline. Relevant industry associations should enhance membership management and policy advocacy, based on their own responsibilities, advocate and urge member units to resist illegal financial activities related to virtual currency and the tokenization of real-world assets. Member units that violate regulatory policies and industry self-discipline rules are to be disciplined in accordance with relevant self-regulatory management regulations. By leveraging various industry infrastructure, conduct risk monitoring related to virtual currency, the tokenization of real-world assets, and promptly transfer issue clues to relevant departments.


  IV. Strict Supervision of Domestic Entities Engaging in Overseas Business Activities


(XIII) Without the approval of relevant departments in accordance with the law and regulations, domestic entities and foreign entities controlled by them may not issue virtual currency overseas.


  (XIV) Domestic entities engaging directly or indirectly in overseas external debt-based tokenization of real-world assets, or conducting asset securitization activities abroad based on domestic ownership rights, income rights, etc. (hereinafter referred to as domestic equity), should be strictly regulated in accordance with the principles of "same business, same risk, same rules." The National Development and Reform Commission, the China Securities Regulatory Commission, the State Administration of Foreign Exchange, and other relevant departments regulate it according to their respective responsibilities. For other forms of overseas real-world asset tokenization activities based on domestic equity by domestic entities, the China Securities Regulatory Commission, together with relevant departments, supervise according to their division of responsibilities. Without the consent and filing of relevant departments, no unit or individual may engage in the above-mentioned business.


  (15) Overseas subsidiaries and branches of domestic financial institutions providing Real World Asset Tokenization-related services overseas shall do so legally and prudently. They shall have professional personnel and systems in place to effectively mitigate business risks, strictly implement customer onboarding, suitability management, anti-money laundering requirements, and incorporate them into the domestic financial institutions' compliance and risk management system. Intermediaries and information technology service providers offering Real World Asset Tokenization services abroad based on domestic equity or conducting Real World Asset Tokenization business in the form of overseas debt for domestic entities directly or indirectly venturing abroad must strictly comply with relevant laws and regulations. They should establish and improve relevant compliance and internal control systems in accordance with relevant normative requirements, strengthen business and risk control, and report the business developments to the relevant regulatory authorities for approval or filing.


  V. Strengthen Organizational Implementation


  (16) Strengthen organizational leadership and overall coordination. All departments and regions should attach great importance to the prevention of risks related to virtual currencies and Real World Asset Tokenization, strengthen organizational leadership, clarify work responsibilities, form a long-term effective working mechanism with centralized coordination, local implementation, and shared responsibilities, maintain high pressure, dynamically monitor risks, effectively prevent and mitigate risks in an orderly and efficient manner, legally protect the property security of the people, and make every effort to maintain economic and financial order and social stability.


  (17) Widely carry out publicity and education. All departments, regions, and industry associations should make full use of various media and other communication channels to disseminate information through legal and policy interpretation, analysis of typical cases, and education on investment risks, etc. They should promote the illegality and harm of virtual currencies and Real World Asset Tokenization-related businesses and their manifestations, fully alert to potential risks and hidden dangers, and enhance public awareness and identification capabilities for risk prevention.


  VI. Legal Responsibility


  (18) Engaging in illegal financial activities related to virtual currencies and Real World Asset Tokenization in violation of this notice, as well as providing services for virtual currencies and Real World Asset Tokenization-related businesses, shall be punished in accordance with relevant regulations. If it constitutes a crime, criminal liability shall be pursued according to the law. For domestic entities and individuals who knowingly or should have known that overseas entities illegally provided virtual currency or Real World Asset Tokenization-related services to domestic entities and still assisted them, relevant responsibilities shall be pursued according to the law. If it constitutes a crime, criminal liability shall be pursued according to the law.


  (19) If any unit or individual invests in virtual currencies, Real World Asset Tokens, and related financial products against public order and good customs, the relevant civil legal actions shall be invalid, and any resulting losses shall be borne by them. If there are suspicions of disrupting financial order and jeopardizing financial security, the relevant departments shall deal with them according to the law.


  This notice shall enter into force upon the date of its issuance. The People's Bank of China and ten other departments' "Notice on Further Preventing and Dealing with the Risks of Virtual Currency Trading Speculation" (Yinfa [2021] No. 237) is hereby repealed.


Former Partner's Perspective on Multicoin: Kyle's Exit, But the Game He Left Behind Just Getting Started

Kyle knew his game, so he decided to focus on playing the game he was good at and interested in.

Why Bitcoin Is Falling Now: The Real Reasons Behind BTC's Crash & WEEX's Smart Profit Playbook

Bitcoin's ongoing crash explained: Discover the 5 hidden triggers behind BTC's plunge & how WEEX's Auto Earn and Trade to Earn strategies help traders profit from crypto market volatility.

Wall Street's Hottest Trades See Exodus

This time there is no single triggering factor, but rather market anxiety about asset valuation, with many already skeptical of these valuations being too high, leading to investors choosing to retreat almost simultaneously.

Popular coins

Latest Crypto News

Read more