Trump Tariff Tariff Tariff Tariff Tariff Tariff Tariff Tariff Tariff Tariff Tariff Tariff Tariff Tariff Tariff Tariff Tariff Tariff Tariff Tariff Tariff Tariff Tariff Tariff Tariff Tariff Tariff The suspense will soon be revealed: both Goldman Sachs and M

By: blockbeats|2025/04/01 14:15:03
0
Share
copy
Original Title: "Trump Tariff Cliffhanger Unveiled: Goldman Sachs, J.P. Morgan Both Pessimistic, How Will Crypto Investors Break Through?"
Original Author: Oliver, Mars Finance

April 2, 2025, Wednesday, is destined to be a key moment in the global financial markets. U.S. President Donald Trump will announce the highly anticipated reciprocal tariff policy in the White House Rose Garden. As White House Press Secretary Levitt stated, this policy will "reverse decades of exploitative unfair trade practices against the United States" and will be implemented in a "nation-based" manner, with Trump also "committing" to roll out tariffs targeting specific industries at some point in the future.

Upon the news, market sentiment quickly heated up, with the safe-haven asset gold reaching a historic high, U.S. stocks wavering in uncertainty, and the crypto market—especially Bitcoin—not able to stand alone. Combining the latest research reports from Goldman Sachs and J.P. Morgan, let's explore the potential trajectory of this tariff storm and its far-reaching impact on the global economy and the crypto market.

Background: The "Fair" Logic of Reciprocal Tariffs and Market Anxiety

Trump's reciprocal tariff policy is not a sudden whim but rather a continuation of his long-standing trade philosophy. From the campaign period to his first term, Trump has championed "America First" and repeatedly emphasized trade fairness. He believes that the U.S. has been at a disadvantage in international trade, with foreign exports to the U.S. enjoying low tariffs while American products face high tariffs and non-tariff barriers, leading to a widening trade deficit. In 2024, the U.S. goods trade deficit exceeded $1 trillion, a figure that undoubtedly provided a real-world basis for Trump's new policy.

The core logic of reciprocal tariffs seems simple: you tax me, I tax you. However, the actual implementation is far from straightforward. Michael Zezas, Global Head of Fixed Income Research at J.P. Morgan, stated in a report on March 31 that investors are filled with confusion about the tariff policy on April 2. Previously, the Trump administration has made repeated adjustments to tariffs on Mexico, Canada, and China, creating market uncertainty. What's more complex is that the Trump team seems to be weighing whether to include foreign consumption taxes (such as value-added tax) and non-tariff barriers in the calculation scope of reciprocal tariffs. This ambiguity makes it difficult for investors to formulate clear response strategies.

Trump Tariff Tariff Tariff Tariff Tariff Tariff Tariff Tariff Tariff Tariff Tariff Tariff Tariff Tariff Tariff Tariff Tariff Tariff Tariff Tariff Tariff Tariff Tariff Tariff Tariff Tariff Tariff The suspense will soon be revealed: both Goldman Sachs and M

Goldman's report further reveals potential economic risks. The report points out that if the tariff policy is too aggressive, it could lead to rising U.S. inflation, slowing economic growth, and even increase the risk of recession from the current 25% to 35%. Earnings expectations for the S&P 500 index have been lowered, with earnings per share (EPS) dropping from $250 to $245 and the growth rate from 15% to 13%. Meanwhile, safe-haven sentiment has driven the price of gold to break through to new highs, showing that the market's concern about uncertainty has reached its peak.

The "Cascade Effect" in the Crypto Market: The High Correlation Between Bitcoin and the US Stock Market

For the crypto market, Trump's tariff policy is not a distant macro event but a potential trigger for a chain reaction known as the "butterfly effect." In recent years, the high correlation between Bitcoin and the US stock market, especially the S&P 500 Index, has become a market consensus. Data from 2024 shows that the 90-day correlation between Bitcoin and the S&P 500 is as high as 0.85, indicating that stock market movements often drive Bitcoin in the same direction. The potential downside risk for the S&P 500 mentioned in a Goldman Sachs report (if there is an economic recession, the index could fall to 4500 points, a drop of about 12%) has undoubtedly sounded the alarm for Bitcoin.

This correlation has its logic: Although Bitcoin is often seen as "digital gold," its price is more driven by risk asset sentiment rather than pure safe-haven demand. During an economic slowdown or market panic, investors tend to sell off high-risk assets (including Bitcoin) in exchange for cash or safer assets (such as US Treasury bonds). In early 2025, Bitcoin's price briefly exceeded $110,000, but as tariff uncertainty intensified, its price has fallen back to around $82,000, demonstrating the market's sensitivity to risk.

Morgan Stanley Analysis: From Mild to Aggressive, Three Possible Tariff Scenarios

To better understand the tariff policy that Trump may announce on Wednesday, we can refer to Morgan Stanley's analytical framework, which divides potential outcomes into three scenarios: high-clarity low-tariff, low-clarity high-commitment, and high-clarity high-tariff. Each scenario will have a vastly different impact on the economy and the market.

Scenario One: High Clarity, Low Tariff Expansion

If Trump provides highly clear policy details on April 2 and the tariff expansion is small, while clearly stating that there will be no further broadening of the tariff scope, the additional impact on the economy may be relatively limited. The "nation-based" tariffs mentioned by Levitt may imply that the US will set equivalent tax rates based on each trade partner's average tariff level, rather than making significant adjustments targeting specific products or industries. For example, if a country's average tariff on US exports is 5%, the US may impose a 5% tariff on imports from that country.

In this scenario, market uncertainty will significantly decrease, and investors may breathe a sigh of relief. The US stock market may experience a rebound, especially in tech stocks and cyclical industries that were previously dragged down by tariff concerns. However, a Goldman Sachs report reminds us that even without new substantial tariffs, existing tariffs (such as the 25% tariffs on Canada and Mexico in early February and the additional 10% tariff on Chinese goods) will continue to pressure the economy. The US GDP growth rate in 2025 may be only 1.5%, far below the long-term average.

Scenario Two: Low Clarity but Significant Tariff Increase Promise

The second scenario is more uncertain. If Trump's statement lacks specific details but promises a significant future tariff increase, the market may fall into a deeper fog. Levitt mentioned that Trump plans to implement industry tariffs at some point in the future, which may include key sectors such as automobiles, pharmaceuticals, and semiconductors. This "pie in the sky" strategy may aim to force concessions from trading partners through negotiation, but it could also lead to heightened market panic.

In this case, investors may choose to wait and see rather than immediately adjust their portfolios. The S&P 500 Index may continue to fluctuate around its current level, finding it challenging to break through the resistance level (mentioned as 5300 points in a Goldman Sachs report). Meanwhile, the U.S. dollar may strengthen due to safe-haven demand, but rising inflation expectations may prompt the Federal Reserve to cut interest rates earlier. Goldman Sachs predicts that the Federal Reserve may cut interest rates three times in July, September, and November 2025, bringing the federal funds rate down from the current 4.25%-4.5% to 3.5%-3.75%.

Scenario Three: High Clarity, Significant Tariff Increase

The most extreme scenario is that Trump announces a clear and aggressive tariff policy, with tariff rate increases exceeding expectations, even incorporating foreign consumption taxes and non-tariff barriers into the calculation. For example, if a country imposes a 20% tariff on U.S. cars and adds value-added tax, the U.S. may impose equivalent or even higher tariffs on goods from that country to "punish" non-tariff barriers. This aggressive policy could lead to a 15-percentage-point increase in the average tariff rate (Goldman Sachs' March 30 forecast), with an immediate impact on the economy.

In this scenario, the U.S. economic outlook would significantly deteriorate. Consumer prices may rise, real income may decrease, and business investment willingness could further decline. Morgan Stanley points out that in such a situation, fixed-income assets (such as bonds) would relatively benefit, while the stock market may experience a sharp decline, especially in technology and cyclical stocks. Scenario analysis in the Goldman Sachs report also indicates that if the economy enters a recession, the S&P 500 Index could drop to 4500 points, about 12% below the current level.

Hedging Logic in the Crypto Market: Gold Rises, Bitcoin Falls?

The heightened risk aversion mentioned in the Goldman Sachs report (gold hitting a new high) also provides an interesting contrast for the cryptocurrency market. Traditionally, gold has been seen as the ultimate safe-haven asset, while Bitcoin is often touted as "digital gold." However, reality is not so simple. In the first quarter of 2025, the price of gold rose by 19%, while Bitcoin fell by 15% during the same period, indicating that in the face of real macro risks, Bitcoin's hedging properties have not yet been fully recognized by the market.

For blockchain investors, this is a phenomenon worth pondering. Bitcoin's long-term value proposition (decentralization, anti-inflation) may be validated in the future, but in the short term, its price is more driven by macroeconomics and market sentiment. Inflationary pressure due to tariff policies may raise the expectation of Fed rate cuts, and a low-interest-rate environment typically benefits assets like Bitcoin. Therefore, if Trump's tariff policy ultimately leads to an economic hard landing, Bitcoin may experience a long-term rebound after a short-term decline.

Market and Investor Response

Faced with such uncertainty, how should investors respond? High-net-worth individuals recommend overallocating to high-quality stocks and defensive industries (such as healthcare and consumer essentials). For crypto investors, flexibility and risk management are equally important. Here are a few suggestions:

· Monitor the correlation between Bitcoin and the US stock market: If the S&P 500 falls, Bitcoin may follow suit with an adjustment. In the short term, risk exposure can be reduced, awaiting clearer policy signals.

· Diversify investments: In addition to Bitcoin, consider stablecoin or DeFi project's stable returns to hedge market volatility.

· Long-term perspective: If the tariff policy leads to a Fed accelerated rate cut, the low-interest-rate environment may provide long-term support for Bitcoin, making it suitable for buying on dips.

Global Perspective: Trade Partners' Reactions and the Ripple Effect on the Blockchain Industry

Trump's tit-for-tat tariff policy not only affects the US economy but may also trigger a significant adjustment in the global trade landscape. Major trade partners such as Canada, Mexico, and the EU have indicated they will impose retaliatory tariffs, while China may counter with restrictions on rare earth exports. This will have a profound impact on the global tech supply chain, especially the semiconductor industry. The blockchain industry heavily relies on chips (used for mining equipment and data centers). If the supply chain tightens, mining costs may rise, affecting Bitcoin network's hash rate and price.

Trump's tit-for-tat tariff policy is undoubtedly a bombshell for the global economy and crypto market in 2025. Whether it's a mild adjustment or an aggressive move, Wednesday's statement will provide some clues to the market, and investors need to quickly interpret and adjust their strategies. Based on Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley's analysis, slowing economic growth and rising inflation are almost certain trends, and Bitcoin may follow stock market volatility in the short term but still has rebound potential in the long run. On April 2nd, will the rose in the rose garden wither due to the chilling wind of tariffs? For crypto investors, this may be a moment that is both perilous and full of opportunity.

Original Article Link

You may also like

Token Cannot Compound, Where Is the Real Investment Opportunity?

The next chapter in the crypto industry will undoubtedly be written by Crypto-empowered Stocks.

February 6th Market Key Intelligence, How Much Did You Miss?

1. On-chain Flows: $508.2M USD inflow to Ethereum today; $390.8M USD outflow from Arbitrum 2. Biggest Gainers/Losers: $HBTC, $AIO 3. Top News: Current Bitcoin weekly RSI oversold signal comparable to June 2022

China's Central Bank and Eight Other Departments' Latest Regulatory Focus: Key Attention to RWA Tokenized Asset Risk


Foreword: Today, the People's Bank of China's website published the "Notice of the People's Bank of China, National Development and Reform Commission, Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, Ministry of Public Security, State Administration for Market Regulation, China Banking and Insurance Regulatory Commission, China Securities Regulatory Commission, State Administration of Foreign Exchange on Further Preventing and Dealing with Risks Related to Virtual Currency and Others (Yinfa [2026] No. 42)", the latest regulatory requirements from the eight departments including the central bank, which are basically consistent with the regulatory requirements of recent years. The main focus of the regulation is on speculative activities such as virtual currency trading, exchanges, ICOs, overseas platform services, and this time, regulatory oversight of RWA has been added, explicitly prohibiting RWA tokenization, stablecoins (especially those pegged to the RMB). The following is the full text:


To the people's governments of all provinces, autonomous regions, and municipalities directly under the Central Government, the Xinjiang Production and Construction Corps:


  Recently, there have been speculative activities related to virtual currency and Real-World Assets (RWA) tokenization, disrupting the economic and financial order and jeopardizing the property security of the people. In order to further prevent and address the risks related to virtual currency and Real-World Assets tokenization, effectively safeguard national security and social stability, in accordance with the "Law of the People's Republic of China on the People's Bank of China," "Law of the People's Republic of China on Commercial Banks," "Securities Law of the People's Republic of China," "Law of the People's Republic of China on Securities Investment Funds," "Law of the People's Republic of China on Futures and Derivatives," "Cybersecurity Law of the People's Republic of China," "Regulations of the People's Republic of China on the Administration of Renminbi," "Regulations on Prevention and Disposal of Illegal Fundraising," "Regulations of the People's Republic of China on Foreign Exchange Administration," "Telecommunications Regulations of the People's Republic of China," and other provisions, after reaching consensus with the Cyberspace Administration of China, the Supreme People's Court, and the Supreme People's Procuratorate, and with the approval of the State Council, the relevant matters are notified as follows:


  I. Clarify the essential attributes of virtual currency, Real-World Assets tokenization, and related business activities


  (I) Virtual currency does not possess the legal status equivalent to fiat currency. Virtual currencies such as Bitcoin, Ether, Tether, etc., have the main characteristics of being issued by non-monetary authorities, using encryption technology and distributed ledger or similar technology, existing in digital form, etc. They do not have legal tender status, should not and cannot be circulated and used as currency in the market.


  The business activities related to virtual currency are classified as illegal financial activities. The exchange of fiat currency and virtual currency within the territory, exchange of virtual currencies, acting as a central counterparty in buying and selling virtual currencies, providing information intermediary and pricing services for virtual currency transactions, token issuance financing, and trading of virtual currency-related financial products, etc., fall under illegal financial activities, such as suspected illegal issuance of token vouchers, unauthorized public issuance of securities, illegal operation of securities and futures business, illegal fundraising, etc., are strictly prohibited across the board and resolutely banned in accordance with the law. Overseas entities and individuals are not allowed to provide virtual currency-related services to domestic entities in any form.


  A stablecoin pegged to a fiat currency indirectly fulfills some functions of the fiat currency in circulation. Without the consent of relevant authorities in accordance with the law and regulations, any domestic or foreign entity or individual is not allowed to issue a RMB-pegged stablecoin overseas.


(II)Tokenization of Real-World Assets refers to the use of encryption technology and distributed ledger or similar technologies to transform ownership rights, income rights, etc., of assets into tokens (tokens) or other interests or bond certificates with token (token) characteristics, and carry out issuance and trading activities.


  Engaging in the tokenization of real-world assets domestically, as well as providing related intermediary, information technology services, etc., which are suspected of illegal issuance of token vouchers, unauthorized public offering of securities, illegal operation of securities and futures business, illegal fundraising, and other illegal financial activities, shall be prohibited; except for relevant business activities carried out with the approval of the competent authorities in accordance with the law and regulations and relying on specific financial infrastructures. Overseas entities and individuals are not allowed to illegally provide services related to the tokenization of real-world assets to domestic entities in any form.


  II. Sound Work Mechanism


  (III) Inter-agency Coordination. The People's Bank of China, together with the National Development and Reform Commission, the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, the Ministry of Public Security, the State Administration for Market Regulation, the China Banking and Insurance Regulatory Commission, the China Securities Regulatory Commission, the State Administration of Foreign Exchange, and other departments, will improve the work mechanism, strengthen coordination with the Cyberspace Administration of China, the Supreme People's Court, and the Supreme People's Procuratorate, coordinate efforts, and overall guide regions to carry out risk prevention and disposal of virtual currency-related illegal financial activities.


  The China Securities Regulatory Commission, together with the National Development and Reform Commission, the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, the Ministry of Public Security, the People's Bank of China, the State Administration for Market Regulation, the China Banking and Insurance Regulatory Commission, the State Administration of Foreign Exchange, and other departments, will improve the work mechanism, strengthen coordination with the Cyberspace Administration of China, the Supreme People's Court, and the Supreme People's Procuratorate, coordinate efforts, and overall guide regions to carry out risk prevention and disposal of illegal financial activities related to the tokenization of real-world assets.


  (IV) Strengthening Local Implementation. The people's governments at the provincial level are overall responsible for the prevention and disposal of risks related to virtual currencies and the tokenization of real-world assets in their respective administrative regions. The specific leading department is the local financial regulatory department, with participation from branches and dispatched institutions of the State Council's financial regulatory department, telecommunications regulators, public security, market supervision, and other departments, in coordination with cyberspace departments, courts, and procuratorates, to improve the normalization of the work mechanism, effectively connect with the relevant work mechanisms of central departments, form a cooperative and coordinated working pattern between central and local governments, effectively prevent and properly handle risks related to virtual currencies and the tokenization of real-world assets, and maintain economic and financial order and social stability.


  III. Strengthened Risk Monitoring, Prevention, and Disposal


  (5) Enhanced Risk Monitoring. The People's Bank of China, China Securities Regulatory Commission, National Development and Reform Commission, Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, Ministry of Public Security, State Administration of Foreign Exchange, Cyberspace Administration of China, and other departments continue to improve monitoring techniques and system support, enhance cross-departmental data analysis and sharing, establish sound information sharing and cross-validation mechanisms, promptly grasp the risk situation of activities related to virtual currency and real-world asset tokenization. Local governments at all levels give full play to the role of local monitoring and early warning mechanisms. Local financial regulatory authorities, together with branches and agencies of the State Council's financial regulatory authorities, as well as departments of cyberspace and public security, ensure effective connection between online monitoring, offline investigation, and fund tracking, efficiently and accurately identify activities related to virtual currency and real-world asset tokenization, promptly share risk information, improve early warning information dissemination, verification, and rapid response mechanisms.


  (6) Strengthened Oversight of Financial Institutions, Intermediaries, and Technology Service Providers. Financial institutions (including non-bank payment institutions) are prohibited from providing account opening, fund transfer, and clearing services for virtual currency-related business activities, issuing and selling financial products related to virtual currency, including virtual currency and related financial products in the scope of collateral, conducting insurance business related to virtual currency, or including virtual currency in the scope of insurance liability. Financial institutions (including non-bank payment institutions) are prohibited from providing custody, clearing, and settlement services for unauthorized real-world asset tokenization-related business and related financial products. Relevant intermediary institutions and information technology service providers are prohibited from providing intermediary, technical, or other services for unauthorized real-world asset tokenization-related businesses and related financial products.


  (7) Enhanced Management of Internet Information Content and Access. Internet enterprises are prohibited from providing online business venues, commercial displays, marketing, advertising, or paid traffic diversion services for virtual currency and real-world asset tokenization-related business activities. Upon discovering clues of illegal activities, they should promptly report to relevant departments and provide technical support and assistance for related investigations and inquiries. Based on the clues transferred by the financial regulatory authorities, the cyberspace administration, telecommunications authorities, and public security departments should promptly close and deal with websites, mobile applications (including mini-programs), and public accounts engaged in virtual currency and real-world asset tokenization-related business activities in accordance with the law.


  (8) Strengthened Entity Registration and Advertisement Management. Market supervision departments strengthen entity registration and management, and enterprise and individual business registrations must not contain terms such as "virtual currency," "virtual asset," "cryptocurrency," "crypto asset," "stablecoin," "real-world asset tokenization," or "RWA" in their names or business scopes. Market supervision departments, together with financial regulatory authorities, legally enhance the supervision of advertisements related to virtual currency and real-world asset tokenization, promptly investigating and handling relevant illegal advertisements.


  (IX) Continued Rectification of Virtual Currency Mining Activities. The National Development and Reform Commission, together with relevant departments, strictly controls virtual currency mining activities, continuously promotes the rectification of virtual currency mining activities. The people's governments of various provinces take overall responsibility for the rectification of "mining" within their respective administrative regions. In accordance with the requirements of the National Development and Reform Commission and other departments in the "Notice on the Rectification of Virtual Currency Mining Activities" (NDRC Energy-saving Building [2021] No. 1283) and the provisions of the "Guidance Catalog for Industrial Structure Adjustment (2024 Edition)," a comprehensive review, investigation, and closure of existing virtual currency mining projects are conducted, new mining projects are strictly prohibited, and mining machine production enterprises are strictly prohibited from providing mining machine sales and other services within the country.


  (X) Severe Crackdown on Related Illegal Financial Activities. Upon discovering clues to illegal financial activities related to virtual currency and the tokenization of real-world assets, local financial regulatory authorities, branches of the State Council's financial regulatory authorities, and other relevant departments promptly investigate, determine, and properly handle the issues in accordance with the law, and seriously hold the relevant entities and individuals legally responsible. Those suspected of crimes are transferred to the judicial authorities for processing according to the law.


 (XI) Severe Crackdown on Related Illegal and Criminal Activities. The Ministry of Public Security, the People's Bank of China, the State Administration for Market Regulation, the China Banking and Insurance Regulatory Commission, the China Securities Regulatory Commission, as well as judicial and procuratorial organs, in accordance with their respective responsibilities, rigorously crack down on illegal and criminal activities related to virtual currency, the tokenization of real-world assets, such as fraud, money laundering, illegal business operations, pyramid schemes, illegal fundraising, and other illegal and criminal activities carried out under the guise of virtual currency, the tokenization of real-world assets, etc.


  (XII) Strengthen Industry Self-discipline. Relevant industry associations should enhance membership management and policy advocacy, based on their own responsibilities, advocate and urge member units to resist illegal financial activities related to virtual currency and the tokenization of real-world assets. Member units that violate regulatory policies and industry self-discipline rules are to be disciplined in accordance with relevant self-regulatory management regulations. By leveraging various industry infrastructure, conduct risk monitoring related to virtual currency, the tokenization of real-world assets, and promptly transfer issue clues to relevant departments.


  IV. Strict Supervision of Domestic Entities Engaging in Overseas Business Activities


(XIII) Without the approval of relevant departments in accordance with the law and regulations, domestic entities and foreign entities controlled by them may not issue virtual currency overseas.


  (XIV) Domestic entities engaging directly or indirectly in overseas external debt-based tokenization of real-world assets, or conducting asset securitization activities abroad based on domestic ownership rights, income rights, etc. (hereinafter referred to as domestic equity), should be strictly regulated in accordance with the principles of "same business, same risk, same rules." The National Development and Reform Commission, the China Securities Regulatory Commission, the State Administration of Foreign Exchange, and other relevant departments regulate it according to their respective responsibilities. For other forms of overseas real-world asset tokenization activities based on domestic equity by domestic entities, the China Securities Regulatory Commission, together with relevant departments, supervise according to their division of responsibilities. Without the consent and filing of relevant departments, no unit or individual may engage in the above-mentioned business.


  (15) Overseas subsidiaries and branches of domestic financial institutions providing Real World Asset Tokenization-related services overseas shall do so legally and prudently. They shall have professional personnel and systems in place to effectively mitigate business risks, strictly implement customer onboarding, suitability management, anti-money laundering requirements, and incorporate them into the domestic financial institutions' compliance and risk management system. Intermediaries and information technology service providers offering Real World Asset Tokenization services abroad based on domestic equity or conducting Real World Asset Tokenization business in the form of overseas debt for domestic entities directly or indirectly venturing abroad must strictly comply with relevant laws and regulations. They should establish and improve relevant compliance and internal control systems in accordance with relevant normative requirements, strengthen business and risk control, and report the business developments to the relevant regulatory authorities for approval or filing.


  V. Strengthen Organizational Implementation


  (16) Strengthen organizational leadership and overall coordination. All departments and regions should attach great importance to the prevention of risks related to virtual currencies and Real World Asset Tokenization, strengthen organizational leadership, clarify work responsibilities, form a long-term effective working mechanism with centralized coordination, local implementation, and shared responsibilities, maintain high pressure, dynamically monitor risks, effectively prevent and mitigate risks in an orderly and efficient manner, legally protect the property security of the people, and make every effort to maintain economic and financial order and social stability.


  (17) Widely carry out publicity and education. All departments, regions, and industry associations should make full use of various media and other communication channels to disseminate information through legal and policy interpretation, analysis of typical cases, and education on investment risks, etc. They should promote the illegality and harm of virtual currencies and Real World Asset Tokenization-related businesses and their manifestations, fully alert to potential risks and hidden dangers, and enhance public awareness and identification capabilities for risk prevention.


  VI. Legal Responsibility


  (18) Engaging in illegal financial activities related to virtual currencies and Real World Asset Tokenization in violation of this notice, as well as providing services for virtual currencies and Real World Asset Tokenization-related businesses, shall be punished in accordance with relevant regulations. If it constitutes a crime, criminal liability shall be pursued according to the law. For domestic entities and individuals who knowingly or should have known that overseas entities illegally provided virtual currency or Real World Asset Tokenization-related services to domestic entities and still assisted them, relevant responsibilities shall be pursued according to the law. If it constitutes a crime, criminal liability shall be pursued according to the law.


  (19) If any unit or individual invests in virtual currencies, Real World Asset Tokens, and related financial products against public order and good customs, the relevant civil legal actions shall be invalid, and any resulting losses shall be borne by them. If there are suspicions of disrupting financial order and jeopardizing financial security, the relevant departments shall deal with them according to the law.


  This notice shall enter into force upon the date of its issuance. The People's Bank of China and ten other departments' "Notice on Further Preventing and Dealing with the Risks of Virtual Currency Trading Speculation" (Yinfa [2021] No. 237) is hereby repealed.


Former Partner's Perspective on Multicoin: Kyle's Exit, But the Game He Left Behind Just Getting Started

Kyle knew his game, so he decided to focus on playing the game he was good at and interested in.

Why Bitcoin Is Falling Now: The Real Reasons Behind BTC's Crash & WEEX's Smart Profit Playbook

Bitcoin's ongoing crash explained: Discover the 5 hidden triggers behind BTC's plunge & how WEEX's Auto Earn and Trade to Earn strategies help traders profit from crypto market volatility.

Wall Street's Hottest Trades See Exodus

This time there is no single triggering factor, but rather market anxiety about asset valuation, with many already skeptical of these valuations being too high, leading to investors choosing to retreat almost simultaneously.

Popular coins

Latest Crypto News

Read more