UNI Burn Arbitrage Opportunity, Ondo Tokenized Stock Liquidity Debate, What’s the Overseas Crypto Community Talking About Today?

By: crypto insight|2025/12/30 15:30:10
0
Share
copy

Key Takeaways

  • The crypto market is buzzing with multi-threaded discussions, from macro trends to specific protocols and scams.
  • Forecasts for 2026 show a mix of optimism and skepticism about crypto market growth, with opinions split on the future of DeFi and token economics.
  • Ethereum and Solana’s ongoing developments in institutionalization and order flow monetization are crucial to their ecosystems.
  • The Uniswap token burn mechanism has opened up arbitrage opportunities, albeit with high entry barriers.

WEEX Crypto News, 2025-12-30 07:09:36

In the fast-paced world of cryptocurrency, the past 24 hours have been nothing short of a whirlwind of activity, with market enthusiasts diving deep into macro cycle dialogues and specific protocol competitions. There’s been a convergence of themes dominating the discourse, from predictions about the 2026 market landscape to the intricacies of security and fraud risks. Alongside these discussions, there has been a surge in debates around Solana’s order flow and MEV structure, with Ethereum’s institutional advancements syncing with a growing AI narrative. Moreover, the valuation spread and competitive dynamics within the Perp DEX track have expanded, revealing the vibrant diversity within this marketplace.

Mainstream Topics

2026 Market Prediction Discussion

As the crypto community stands on the threshold of 2026, predictions about the upcoming year are rife, showcasing a spectrum of perspectives on the trajectory of major cryptocurrencies and blockchain technology. Key figures in the industry have expressed their opinions, sparking both debate and contemplation.

Haseeb’s Prediction and Its Controversy:
In a bold statement, Haseeb forecasted that Bitcoin (BTC) would rise above $150,000 by 2026, although he anticipates a decline in BTC dominance. He also expressed optimism for Ethereum and Solana, projecting that equity perpetual contracts could represent over 20% of the DeFi perpetual contract market. Yet, this optimistic view was met with strong opposition from @MemeIndexer, who argued that liquidity fragmentation and higher costs in the DeFi space, coupled with insufficient settlement speeds, would deter such growth. Furthermore, regulatory pressures, he stressed, could intensify through actions from entities like Citadel, complicating the realization of these predictions.

Mo Shaikh’s Insight:
@Moshaikh highlighted an overlooked asset class: “labs”– the innovation powerhouses of product and infrastructure teams. He suggested these entities might soon become the focus of acquisitions by financial institutions (FIs). Shaikh predicted a scenario where crypto companies attract fintech users, while fintech firms rush to integrate newer financial technologies like stablecoins and tokenized deposits. He emphasized that major financial institutions are transitioning from pilot projects to actual products, with significant acquisitions anticipated. This potential evolution, he noted, is one he has personally explored with leading financial organizations globally.

Santiago R Santos’ Cautionary Note:
@SantiagoRoel offered a warning to investors: the assumption that increased adoption will automatically escalate all asset prices might leave many frustrated by 2026. He attributes this to markets pricing well in advance, alongside poor value capture and unfavorable tokenomics. Santos foresees the application layer, specifically DeFi, outperforming the base layer, with tangible value gravitating towards applications proficient in capturing fees.

Vance Spencer’s Macro Outlook:
Vance Spencer, known in the crypto circles as @pythianism, provided a macro outlook, pointing to fewer token issuances by 2026 and a heightened focus on essential assets like Ethereum (ETH) and BTC. According to him, institutions are pivoting towards acquiring DeFi blue chips—protocols that exhibit both financial discipline and a commitment to buybacks. It is predicted that the future lies in sectors like stablecoins, RWAs (Real World Assets), and management within lending capital markets, achievable through a “do less, do well, and go regulatory” approach.

These prognostications collectively hint at an industry transitioning towards maturity, stressing the role of regulatory compliance, institutional investors, and effective value capture. The community has generally responded positively, although particular forecasts, such as those about equity perps, have sparked additional debate.

ZachXBT Exposes Coinbase Impersonation Scam

The cryptocurrency community was rattled by revelations from renowned on-chain investigator, ZachXBT, who uncovered a large-scale scam operation by an individual named Haby, based in Canada. Haby’s tactic involved masquerading as Coinbase’s official support to conduct a series of social engineering scams, culminating in asset thefts exceeding $2 million over the past year.

Detailed investigation exposed Haby’s scam methods, including a public boast on December 30, 2024, about stealing 21,000 XRP, equating to around $44,000, from a Coinbase victim. Connections were identified between this theft and certain Telegram and Instagram accounts, which linked back to Haby. His social engineering prowess extended to multiple related theft cases, with a total value over $500,000. The stolen XRP was often converted to Bitcoin, with address balances corroborating further theft amounts.

Video evidence shedding light on his methods further revealed ties to extravagant personal spending and frequent purchases of premium Telegram usernames. Despite his lavish lifestyle, open-source intelligence pointed to his residence in Abbotsford, British Columbia, and documented instances of him being targeted by swatting incidents.

ZachXBT’s call for Canadian law enforcement to act underscores the seriousness of this case. This incident sparked significant community dialogue, underscoring the ongoing risks of social engineering and highlighting the critical role of on-chain traceability in deterring fraud.

Uniswap Token Burn Arbitrage Opportunity

Notable changes in Uniswap’s fee structure have attracted attention, particularly the announcement by founder Hayden Adams to eliminate front-end fees across various Uniswap interfaces. This sparked debate over a novel arbitrage opportunity involving the burning of UNI tokens.

Via on-chain evidence, a trader effectively engaged in burning approximately 4,000 UNI tokens valued at $24,000, in return for assets such as USDC, USDT, WETH, and WBTC with a collective worth of $39,500. This netted a healthy profit of approximately $14,500, illustrating a favorable arbitrage scenario resulting from recent fee and contract structure modifications.

Community insights suggest that such profitable openings stem predominantly from front-running dynamics. Despite this, the absence of a user-friendly interface poses a challenge, deterring average users from pursuing such arbitrage. Skepticism persists, reminding potential participants to carefully weigh gas costs, risks of unsuccessful execution, and the fleeting nature of such opportunities.

Ondo Tokenized Stock On-Chain Liquidity Dispute

Ondo Finance’s introduction of tokenized stocks, such as xTSLA, has ignited intensive debate regarding its liquidity framework. The conversation intensified following a revelation by @AzFlin, observing a significant disparity in slippage for xTSLA/USDC trades. While some platforms displayed a minimal 0.03% slippage, actual on-chain liquidity painted a different picture, reportedly around $7,000, indicating slippage levels of up to 45%.

Enhanced liquidity appeared during US stock market operating hours, attributed to off-chain market maker participation. These facts sparked a broader discussion about the merits of tokenized stocks, focusing largely on whether the benefits sufficiently outweigh the potential risks related to liquidity constraints and execution.

Criticism targeted the perceived inadequacy of the on-chain liquidity structure, suspecting an over-reliance on traditional trading hours—an issue resonant with similar projects like xStocksFi. While the RWA model itself wasn’t refuted, consensus suggested improvements in liquidity infrastructure were necessary to realize full potential.

Mainstream Ecosystem Updates

Solana: PFOF and Order Flow Monetization Research

During MEV Day, insights into Solana’s Payment for Order Flow (PFOF) surfaced, offering a nuanced look into the systemic intricacies of order routing within Solana’s ecosystem. Enthusiasts @bqbrady delivered an expansive analysis on Solana’s monetization approaches across wallets and decentralized exchanges (DEXs).

The study highlighted deviations among various execution services in terms of both fee distribution and operational efficiency. Notably, Nozomi’s fees peaked at $3.25, whereas Jito and Astralane demonstrated more competitive pricing.

Community discussions delved into issues of trust and decentralization, with advocates for Transaction Processing Unit (TPU) routing emphasizing its trustless nature over traditional Remote Procedure Calls (RPCs). Nonetheless, caution was advised, highlighting risks of implicit front-running amidst high slippage scenarios.

These developments reflect Solana’s maturation trajectory, signifying a shift towards more optimized solutions concerning MEV and order flow.

Ethereum: Institutional Narrative and On-Chain Activity Sync Upward

Ethereum continues to impress as it converges institutional participation with vibrant on-chain activity. Joseph Chalom, CEO of SharpLink, made bold predictions about Ethereum’s 2026 trajectory, suggesting potential tenfold increases in Total Value Locked (TVL) and the stablecoin market cap soaring to $500 billion.

Simultaneously, influential ai16z figure Shaw’s return, with plans to integrate projects across Solana, Base, BSC, and Ethereum via elizaOS, has been met with community excitement. The prospect of intertwining AI and DeFi signals promising experiments poised to invigorate the Ethereum ecosystem.

On-chain activity metrics present a rich tapestry of growth, with validator queue entries surging notably—the entry queue expands nearly twice that of exits, alluding to Ethereum’s soaring mainnet throughput. Broad consensus deems Layer 2 (L2) developments as value-additive rather than detracting, indicating a robust expansion in settlement capacities.

Perp DEX: Structural Comparison between Lighter and Hyperliquid

The forthcoming Token Generation Event (TGE) of Lighter has ushered in fervent debates about valuation and token value accrual, especially in contrast with Hyperliquid. Community assessments suggest Lighter requires substantial trading volume to rival Hyperliquid’s revenue model under current fee structures.

While opinions diverge, some believe Lighter, possessing a clear Product Market Fit (PMF) and real income potential, could be significantly undervalued in the long term. Hyperliquid, meanwhile, boasts open interest (OI) increases of roughly $400 million within a single day, elevating its total OI to $7.35 billion, thereby reinforcing its dominance within the perpetual DEX category. Discussion tends to pivot more around structural divergences than transient price fluctuations.


FAQs

What are the main trends in the crypto markets as 2026 approaches?

The primary trends include debates on macroeconomic cycles, specific protocol trajectories, market predictions for 2026, and regulatory compliance. Furthermore, there’s significant interest in how ecosystems like Ethereum and Solana are evolving, especially with institutional and AI integrations.

How has ZachXBT contributed to on-chain security?

ZachXBT has illuminated various scams, most notably exposing a large-scale Coinbase impersonation scam orchestrated by a Canadian individual named Haby. His analytical work emphasizes the importance of social engineering risk awareness and the power of on-chain traceability in uncovering such frauds.

What opportunities have arisen from Uniswap’s new fee structure?

The elimination of Uniswap’s front-end fees has introduced an arbitrage opportunity related to the UNI token burn mechanism. However, these opportunities remain considerably complex for the average user due to technical constraints and entry barriers, including high gas costs.

Why is there contention around Ondo Finance’s tokenized stocks?

Ondo Finance’s tokenized stocks, such as xTSLA, have been critiqued for liquidity issues, particularly the disparity in on-chain liquidity during off-market hours. This raises questions about the model’s practicality in terms of execution risk versus potential benefits in a low liquidity environment.

How are ecosystems like Solana and Ethereum adapting to emerging financial technologies?

Both ecosystems are witnessing significant growth and adaptation, with Solana focusing on order flow optimization and Ethereum engaging with institutional narratives and AI as means of expanding on-chain activity. These adaptations signal a move towards greater market maturity and innovation within blockchain technologies.

You may also like

Token Cannot Compound, Where Is the Real Investment Opportunity?

The next chapter in the crypto industry will undoubtedly be written by Crypto-empowered Stocks.

February 6th Market Key Intelligence, How Much Did You Miss?

1. On-chain Flows: $508.2M USD inflow to Ethereum today; $390.8M USD outflow from Arbitrum 2. Biggest Gainers/Losers: $HBTC, $AIO 3. Top News: Current Bitcoin weekly RSI oversold signal comparable to June 2022

China's Central Bank and Eight Other Departments' Latest Regulatory Focus: Key Attention to RWA Tokenized Asset Risk


Foreword: Today, the People's Bank of China's website published the "Notice of the People's Bank of China, National Development and Reform Commission, Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, Ministry of Public Security, State Administration for Market Regulation, China Banking and Insurance Regulatory Commission, China Securities Regulatory Commission, State Administration of Foreign Exchange on Further Preventing and Dealing with Risks Related to Virtual Currency and Others (Yinfa [2026] No. 42)", the latest regulatory requirements from the eight departments including the central bank, which are basically consistent with the regulatory requirements of recent years. The main focus of the regulation is on speculative activities such as virtual currency trading, exchanges, ICOs, overseas platform services, and this time, regulatory oversight of RWA has been added, explicitly prohibiting RWA tokenization, stablecoins (especially those pegged to the RMB). The following is the full text:


To the people's governments of all provinces, autonomous regions, and municipalities directly under the Central Government, the Xinjiang Production and Construction Corps:


  Recently, there have been speculative activities related to virtual currency and Real-World Assets (RWA) tokenization, disrupting the economic and financial order and jeopardizing the property security of the people. In order to further prevent and address the risks related to virtual currency and Real-World Assets tokenization, effectively safeguard national security and social stability, in accordance with the "Law of the People's Republic of China on the People's Bank of China," "Law of the People's Republic of China on Commercial Banks," "Securities Law of the People's Republic of China," "Law of the People's Republic of China on Securities Investment Funds," "Law of the People's Republic of China on Futures and Derivatives," "Cybersecurity Law of the People's Republic of China," "Regulations of the People's Republic of China on the Administration of Renminbi," "Regulations on Prevention and Disposal of Illegal Fundraising," "Regulations of the People's Republic of China on Foreign Exchange Administration," "Telecommunications Regulations of the People's Republic of China," and other provisions, after reaching consensus with the Cyberspace Administration of China, the Supreme People's Court, and the Supreme People's Procuratorate, and with the approval of the State Council, the relevant matters are notified as follows:


  I. Clarify the essential attributes of virtual currency, Real-World Assets tokenization, and related business activities


  (I) Virtual currency does not possess the legal status equivalent to fiat currency. Virtual currencies such as Bitcoin, Ether, Tether, etc., have the main characteristics of being issued by non-monetary authorities, using encryption technology and distributed ledger or similar technology, existing in digital form, etc. They do not have legal tender status, should not and cannot be circulated and used as currency in the market.


  The business activities related to virtual currency are classified as illegal financial activities. The exchange of fiat currency and virtual currency within the territory, exchange of virtual currencies, acting as a central counterparty in buying and selling virtual currencies, providing information intermediary and pricing services for virtual currency transactions, token issuance financing, and trading of virtual currency-related financial products, etc., fall under illegal financial activities, such as suspected illegal issuance of token vouchers, unauthorized public issuance of securities, illegal operation of securities and futures business, illegal fundraising, etc., are strictly prohibited across the board and resolutely banned in accordance with the law. Overseas entities and individuals are not allowed to provide virtual currency-related services to domestic entities in any form.


  A stablecoin pegged to a fiat currency indirectly fulfills some functions of the fiat currency in circulation. Without the consent of relevant authorities in accordance with the law and regulations, any domestic or foreign entity or individual is not allowed to issue a RMB-pegged stablecoin overseas.


(II)Tokenization of Real-World Assets refers to the use of encryption technology and distributed ledger or similar technologies to transform ownership rights, income rights, etc., of assets into tokens (tokens) or other interests or bond certificates with token (token) characteristics, and carry out issuance and trading activities.


  Engaging in the tokenization of real-world assets domestically, as well as providing related intermediary, information technology services, etc., which are suspected of illegal issuance of token vouchers, unauthorized public offering of securities, illegal operation of securities and futures business, illegal fundraising, and other illegal financial activities, shall be prohibited; except for relevant business activities carried out with the approval of the competent authorities in accordance with the law and regulations and relying on specific financial infrastructures. Overseas entities and individuals are not allowed to illegally provide services related to the tokenization of real-world assets to domestic entities in any form.


  II. Sound Work Mechanism


  (III) Inter-agency Coordination. The People's Bank of China, together with the National Development and Reform Commission, the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, the Ministry of Public Security, the State Administration for Market Regulation, the China Banking and Insurance Regulatory Commission, the China Securities Regulatory Commission, the State Administration of Foreign Exchange, and other departments, will improve the work mechanism, strengthen coordination with the Cyberspace Administration of China, the Supreme People's Court, and the Supreme People's Procuratorate, coordinate efforts, and overall guide regions to carry out risk prevention and disposal of virtual currency-related illegal financial activities.


  The China Securities Regulatory Commission, together with the National Development and Reform Commission, the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, the Ministry of Public Security, the People's Bank of China, the State Administration for Market Regulation, the China Banking and Insurance Regulatory Commission, the State Administration of Foreign Exchange, and other departments, will improve the work mechanism, strengthen coordination with the Cyberspace Administration of China, the Supreme People's Court, and the Supreme People's Procuratorate, coordinate efforts, and overall guide regions to carry out risk prevention and disposal of illegal financial activities related to the tokenization of real-world assets.


  (IV) Strengthening Local Implementation. The people's governments at the provincial level are overall responsible for the prevention and disposal of risks related to virtual currencies and the tokenization of real-world assets in their respective administrative regions. The specific leading department is the local financial regulatory department, with participation from branches and dispatched institutions of the State Council's financial regulatory department, telecommunications regulators, public security, market supervision, and other departments, in coordination with cyberspace departments, courts, and procuratorates, to improve the normalization of the work mechanism, effectively connect with the relevant work mechanisms of central departments, form a cooperative and coordinated working pattern between central and local governments, effectively prevent and properly handle risks related to virtual currencies and the tokenization of real-world assets, and maintain economic and financial order and social stability.


  III. Strengthened Risk Monitoring, Prevention, and Disposal


  (5) Enhanced Risk Monitoring. The People's Bank of China, China Securities Regulatory Commission, National Development and Reform Commission, Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, Ministry of Public Security, State Administration of Foreign Exchange, Cyberspace Administration of China, and other departments continue to improve monitoring techniques and system support, enhance cross-departmental data analysis and sharing, establish sound information sharing and cross-validation mechanisms, promptly grasp the risk situation of activities related to virtual currency and real-world asset tokenization. Local governments at all levels give full play to the role of local monitoring and early warning mechanisms. Local financial regulatory authorities, together with branches and agencies of the State Council's financial regulatory authorities, as well as departments of cyberspace and public security, ensure effective connection between online monitoring, offline investigation, and fund tracking, efficiently and accurately identify activities related to virtual currency and real-world asset tokenization, promptly share risk information, improve early warning information dissemination, verification, and rapid response mechanisms.


  (6) Strengthened Oversight of Financial Institutions, Intermediaries, and Technology Service Providers. Financial institutions (including non-bank payment institutions) are prohibited from providing account opening, fund transfer, and clearing services for virtual currency-related business activities, issuing and selling financial products related to virtual currency, including virtual currency and related financial products in the scope of collateral, conducting insurance business related to virtual currency, or including virtual currency in the scope of insurance liability. Financial institutions (including non-bank payment institutions) are prohibited from providing custody, clearing, and settlement services for unauthorized real-world asset tokenization-related business and related financial products. Relevant intermediary institutions and information technology service providers are prohibited from providing intermediary, technical, or other services for unauthorized real-world asset tokenization-related businesses and related financial products.


  (7) Enhanced Management of Internet Information Content and Access. Internet enterprises are prohibited from providing online business venues, commercial displays, marketing, advertising, or paid traffic diversion services for virtual currency and real-world asset tokenization-related business activities. Upon discovering clues of illegal activities, they should promptly report to relevant departments and provide technical support and assistance for related investigations and inquiries. Based on the clues transferred by the financial regulatory authorities, the cyberspace administration, telecommunications authorities, and public security departments should promptly close and deal with websites, mobile applications (including mini-programs), and public accounts engaged in virtual currency and real-world asset tokenization-related business activities in accordance with the law.


  (8) Strengthened Entity Registration and Advertisement Management. Market supervision departments strengthen entity registration and management, and enterprise and individual business registrations must not contain terms such as "virtual currency," "virtual asset," "cryptocurrency," "crypto asset," "stablecoin," "real-world asset tokenization," or "RWA" in their names or business scopes. Market supervision departments, together with financial regulatory authorities, legally enhance the supervision of advertisements related to virtual currency and real-world asset tokenization, promptly investigating and handling relevant illegal advertisements.


  (IX) Continued Rectification of Virtual Currency Mining Activities. The National Development and Reform Commission, together with relevant departments, strictly controls virtual currency mining activities, continuously promotes the rectification of virtual currency mining activities. The people's governments of various provinces take overall responsibility for the rectification of "mining" within their respective administrative regions. In accordance with the requirements of the National Development and Reform Commission and other departments in the "Notice on the Rectification of Virtual Currency Mining Activities" (NDRC Energy-saving Building [2021] No. 1283) and the provisions of the "Guidance Catalog for Industrial Structure Adjustment (2024 Edition)," a comprehensive review, investigation, and closure of existing virtual currency mining projects are conducted, new mining projects are strictly prohibited, and mining machine production enterprises are strictly prohibited from providing mining machine sales and other services within the country.


  (X) Severe Crackdown on Related Illegal Financial Activities. Upon discovering clues to illegal financial activities related to virtual currency and the tokenization of real-world assets, local financial regulatory authorities, branches of the State Council's financial regulatory authorities, and other relevant departments promptly investigate, determine, and properly handle the issues in accordance with the law, and seriously hold the relevant entities and individuals legally responsible. Those suspected of crimes are transferred to the judicial authorities for processing according to the law.


 (XI) Severe Crackdown on Related Illegal and Criminal Activities. The Ministry of Public Security, the People's Bank of China, the State Administration for Market Regulation, the China Banking and Insurance Regulatory Commission, the China Securities Regulatory Commission, as well as judicial and procuratorial organs, in accordance with their respective responsibilities, rigorously crack down on illegal and criminal activities related to virtual currency, the tokenization of real-world assets, such as fraud, money laundering, illegal business operations, pyramid schemes, illegal fundraising, and other illegal and criminal activities carried out under the guise of virtual currency, the tokenization of real-world assets, etc.


  (XII) Strengthen Industry Self-discipline. Relevant industry associations should enhance membership management and policy advocacy, based on their own responsibilities, advocate and urge member units to resist illegal financial activities related to virtual currency and the tokenization of real-world assets. Member units that violate regulatory policies and industry self-discipline rules are to be disciplined in accordance with relevant self-regulatory management regulations. By leveraging various industry infrastructure, conduct risk monitoring related to virtual currency, the tokenization of real-world assets, and promptly transfer issue clues to relevant departments.


  IV. Strict Supervision of Domestic Entities Engaging in Overseas Business Activities


(XIII) Without the approval of relevant departments in accordance with the law and regulations, domestic entities and foreign entities controlled by them may not issue virtual currency overseas.


  (XIV) Domestic entities engaging directly or indirectly in overseas external debt-based tokenization of real-world assets, or conducting asset securitization activities abroad based on domestic ownership rights, income rights, etc. (hereinafter referred to as domestic equity), should be strictly regulated in accordance with the principles of "same business, same risk, same rules." The National Development and Reform Commission, the China Securities Regulatory Commission, the State Administration of Foreign Exchange, and other relevant departments regulate it according to their respective responsibilities. For other forms of overseas real-world asset tokenization activities based on domestic equity by domestic entities, the China Securities Regulatory Commission, together with relevant departments, supervise according to their division of responsibilities. Without the consent and filing of relevant departments, no unit or individual may engage in the above-mentioned business.


  (15) Overseas subsidiaries and branches of domestic financial institutions providing Real World Asset Tokenization-related services overseas shall do so legally and prudently. They shall have professional personnel and systems in place to effectively mitigate business risks, strictly implement customer onboarding, suitability management, anti-money laundering requirements, and incorporate them into the domestic financial institutions' compliance and risk management system. Intermediaries and information technology service providers offering Real World Asset Tokenization services abroad based on domestic equity or conducting Real World Asset Tokenization business in the form of overseas debt for domestic entities directly or indirectly venturing abroad must strictly comply with relevant laws and regulations. They should establish and improve relevant compliance and internal control systems in accordance with relevant normative requirements, strengthen business and risk control, and report the business developments to the relevant regulatory authorities for approval or filing.


  V. Strengthen Organizational Implementation


  (16) Strengthen organizational leadership and overall coordination. All departments and regions should attach great importance to the prevention of risks related to virtual currencies and Real World Asset Tokenization, strengthen organizational leadership, clarify work responsibilities, form a long-term effective working mechanism with centralized coordination, local implementation, and shared responsibilities, maintain high pressure, dynamically monitor risks, effectively prevent and mitigate risks in an orderly and efficient manner, legally protect the property security of the people, and make every effort to maintain economic and financial order and social stability.


  (17) Widely carry out publicity and education. All departments, regions, and industry associations should make full use of various media and other communication channels to disseminate information through legal and policy interpretation, analysis of typical cases, and education on investment risks, etc. They should promote the illegality and harm of virtual currencies and Real World Asset Tokenization-related businesses and their manifestations, fully alert to potential risks and hidden dangers, and enhance public awareness and identification capabilities for risk prevention.


  VI. Legal Responsibility


  (18) Engaging in illegal financial activities related to virtual currencies and Real World Asset Tokenization in violation of this notice, as well as providing services for virtual currencies and Real World Asset Tokenization-related businesses, shall be punished in accordance with relevant regulations. If it constitutes a crime, criminal liability shall be pursued according to the law. For domestic entities and individuals who knowingly or should have known that overseas entities illegally provided virtual currency or Real World Asset Tokenization-related services to domestic entities and still assisted them, relevant responsibilities shall be pursued according to the law. If it constitutes a crime, criminal liability shall be pursued according to the law.


  (19) If any unit or individual invests in virtual currencies, Real World Asset Tokens, and related financial products against public order and good customs, the relevant civil legal actions shall be invalid, and any resulting losses shall be borne by them. If there are suspicions of disrupting financial order and jeopardizing financial security, the relevant departments shall deal with them according to the law.


  This notice shall enter into force upon the date of its issuance. The People's Bank of China and ten other departments' "Notice on Further Preventing and Dealing with the Risks of Virtual Currency Trading Speculation" (Yinfa [2021] No. 237) is hereby repealed.


Former Partner's Perspective on Multicoin: Kyle's Exit, But the Game He Left Behind Just Getting Started

Kyle knew his game, so he decided to focus on playing the game he was good at and interested in.

Why Bitcoin Is Falling Now: The Real Reasons Behind BTC's Crash & WEEX's Smart Profit Playbook

Bitcoin's ongoing crash explained: Discover the 5 hidden triggers behind BTC's plunge & how WEEX's Auto Earn and Trade to Earn strategies help traders profit from crypto market volatility.

Wall Street's Hottest Trades See Exodus

This time there is no single triggering factor, but rather market anxiety about asset valuation, with many already skeptical of these valuations being too high, leading to investors choosing to retreat almost simultaneously.

Popular coins

Latest Crypto News

Read more