Unveiling Funding Rate Arbitrage: How Institutions 'Earn While Sleeping' and Retail Traders 'See But Can't Touch'?

By: blockbeats|2025/04/02 10:15:03
0
Share
copy
Original Title: "Unveiling Funding Rate Arbitrage: How Institutions 'Earn While Lying Down' and Retail Investors 'See But Can't Get'?"
Original Source: 4Alpha Research

1. Basic Concept and Principle of Funding Rate: The Crypto World's 'Balancing Tax' and 'Red Envelope' Mechanism

1.1 What Is a Perpetual Contract?

In the financial market, arbitrage opportunities between the spot and futures markets are not uncommon, with participants ranging from large hedge funds to individual investors. However, in the crypto market's 24/7 trading environment, a special derivative has emerged — the perpetual contract.

Key Difference Between Perpetual Contracts and Traditional Futures Contracts:

· No Delivery Date: Perpetual contracts have no delivery date, allowing users to hold positions long-term as long as their margin remains sufficient and they do not get liquidated.

· Funding Rate Mechanism: The contract price is anchored to the spot price through the funding rate, ensuring that the contract price remains aligned with the spot index price in the long run.

In terms of pricing mechanism, perpetual contracts use a dual-price mechanism:

· Mark Price: Used to calculate liquidation conditions, it is determined by the weighted average spot price from multiple exchanges to prevent manipulation by a single platform.

· Real-Time Trading Price: The actual trading price in the market that determines users' entry cost.

Through the funding rate mechanism, perpetual contracts can maintain long-term market equilibrium without a delivery date.

1.2 What Is a Funding Rate

The funding rate is a mechanism in perpetual contracts used to adjust the market's long and short forces, with its core purpose being to keep the contract price as close to the spot price as possible.

In specific calculation terms, the funding rate consists of a premium part and a fixed part, where the premium refers to the deviation between the contract's real-time trading price and the spot index price.

· Premium Rate = (Contract Price - Spot Index Price) / Spot Index Price

· Funding Rate = Base Rate set by the trading platform

When the funding rate is positive, it indicates that the contract price is higher than the spot price, the long position market is too strong, and long positions need to pay the funding rate to shorts, suppressing excessive optimism in the long positions.

When the funding rate is negative, the opposite is true. Shorts need to pay fees to longs, suppressing excessive pessimism in shorts.

Funding Rate Settlement Period: Generally settled every 8 hours, meaning that users holding contracts within each settlement period need to pay or receive the funding rate.

1.3 How to Understand the Funding Rate Mechanism of Perpetual Contracts in Layman's Terms

The funding rate mechanism of perpetual contracts can be likened to the rental housing market:

· Tenant (Long) = Investor buying perpetual contracts

· Landlord (Short) = Investor shorting perpetual contracts

· Area Average Price (Mark Price) = Spot market average price

· Rental Actual Price (Contract Real-time Price) = Market transaction price of the perpetual contract

Example:

If there are too many tenants (longs) causing the rent (contract price) to be driven up above the market average price (mark price), then tenants need to pay a red packet (funding rate) to landlords to bring the rent down.

If there are too many landlords (shorts) causing the rent to be pushed down, then landlords need to pay a red packet to tenants to push the rent up.

Essentially, the funding rate is a dynamic equilibrium adjustment tax in the market, used to punish the party that disrupts market balance and reward the party that corrects market balance.

2. Funding Rate Arbitrage Strategy: Three Methods with a Common Source of Income

2.1 Financial Explanation of Funding Rate Arbitrage

The core of funding rate arbitrage lies in: locking in funding rate gains through hedging spot and contract positions while avoiding price volatility risks. Its basic logic includes:

· Rate Direction Judgment: Based on long and short forces, significant arbitrage opportunities exist when the funding rate deviates significantly.

· Risk Hedging: Offset price volatility risks through inverse positions in spot and contracts, only earning the funding rate.

· High-Frequency Compounding: Settlement occurs every 8 hours, with a significant compounding effect.

Essentially, Funding Rate Arbitrage is a Delta-Neutral Strategy, which involves locking in a specific yield factor (funding rate) without taking on price direction risk.

2.2 Three Methods of Funding Rate Arbitrage

1) Single-Coin Single-Exchange Platform Arbitrage (Most Common)

Specific operational steps:

a. Determine Direction: If the funding rate is positive, meaning longs pay fees, it is suitable to short the futures contract and long the spot.

b. Establish Positions: Short the perpetual contract + Long the spot

c. Collect Rate: Assuming the underlying spot price rises, the short position in the combination incurs losses, offset by the gains in the two, but the long position in the futures contract needs to pay you the funding rate, earning you the funding rate revenue.

2) Single-Coin Cross-Exchange Platform Arbitrage

Specific operational steps:

a. Scan Exchange Platform Funding Rates: Choose two exchanges with sufficient liquidity and significant differences in funding rates

b. Establish Positions: Short the perpetual contract (Exchange A) + Long the perpetual contract (Exchange B)

c. Earn Funding Rate Difference: Profit from the difference in funding rates based on the exchange's varying rates

3) Multi-Coin Arbitrage

Specific operational steps:

a. Select Highly Correlated Coins: Meaning coins with highly correlated trends, utilize funding rate differentials, hedge direction through position combinations, and earn returns.

b. Establish Positions: Short the high funding rate coin (such as BTC) + Long the low funding rate coin (such as ETH), adjust positions based on the ratio

c. Earn Returns: Funding rate difference + Volatility gains

In the above three methods, the difficulty increases sequentially. In practical applications, the first method is the most common. The second and third methods require high requirements and technical difficulty in terms of execution efficiency and transaction latency. Leveraged arbitrage can also be added on top of the above, but this requires higher risk control and comes with increased risk.

Furthermore, on the basis of funding rate arbitrage, there are more advanced practices that combine spread arbitrage and basis arbitrage to enhance returns and improve capital efficiency. Spread arbitrage refers to arbitrage opportunities using the price difference of the same underlying asset on different trading platforms (spot and perpetual contracts). When the market is highly volatile or liquidity is unevenly distributed, funding rate arbitrage can be combined with spread arbitrage to further increase the strategy's yield. Basis arbitrage involves exploiting the price difference between perpetual contracts and traditional futures contracts. The funding rate of perpetual contracts changes with market sentiment, while traditional futures contracts are settlement contracts, creating a certain price difference relationship.

In summary, regardless of the hedging arbitrage method used, complete risk hedging against price fluctuations must be achieved; otherwise, returns will be eroded. Additionally, costs such as transaction fees, borrowing costs (for leverage operations), slippage, margin requirements, etc., must also be considered. As the overall market matures, the returns from simple strategies will diminish. To sustain profitability, algorithmic monitoring, cross-platform arbitrage, and dynamic position management need to be combined. More advanced arbitrage strategies combined with spread arbitrage require high trading execution efficiency and market monitoring capabilities, making them suitable for institutional investors or quantitative trading teams with a certain level of technical expertise and risk management systems.

3. Institutional Advantage: Why Can Retail Traders "See but Not Eat"? What Is the Reason?

While funding rate arbitrage seems logically simple, in practice, institutions have established a significant advantage through technological barriers, economies of scale, and systematic risk management.

3.1 Opportunity Identification Dimension: A Down-to-Earth Blow on Speed and Breadth

Institutions use algorithms to monitor real-time funding rates, liquidity, correlations, and other parameters across tens of thousands of assets in the market, identifying arbitrage opportunities in milliseconds.

Retail traders rely on manual processes or third-party tools (such as Glassnode), which can only cover hourly lagging data and focus on a few mainstream assets.

3.2 Opportunity Capture Efficiency: The Cost Gap Between Technology and Trading Volume Disparities

Unveiling Funding Rate Arbitrage: How Institutions 'Earn While Sleeping' and Retail Traders 'See But Can't Touch'?

Due to significant advantages in their overall technical infrastructure and cost control, institutions and retail traders may see a yield gap in arbitrage income that could be several times higher.

3.3 Risk Management System: Systematic Risk Response and Human Gameplay

From the perspective of overall risk control, institutions have a mature system for managing position risk, which allows them to act promptly in extreme situations. They can selectively reduce positions, add margin, and take other measures to mitigate risk. In contrast, retail investors tend to respond slowly and have limited tools to deal with extreme conditions. The main differences are as follows:

a. Response Speed: Institutional response speed is at the millisecond level, while individuals operate at the second level at best. When not closely monitored, response times can even stretch to minutes or hours, making it difficult to ensure a rapid response.

b. Risk Control Precision: Institutions can accurately calculate and adjust positions for specific assets or add margin to a reasonable level, dynamically managing their risk exposure. On the other hand, individual investors lack the ability to make precise calculations and adjustments, often resorting to market liquidation.

c. Handling Multiple Assets: When risk events occur, institutions can concurrently manage positions in dozens or even hundreds of assets, minimizing the impact on each asset. In contrast, individual investors can only handle assets sequentially, processing a limited number of assets in a single-threaded manner.

4. Outlook for Arbitrage Strategies and Investor Adaptation

4.1 Institutional Arbitrage Strategy Differences and Market Capacity Limit

Many people wonder if the market can support the widespread adoption of arbitrage strategies by institutions and whether this would dampen returns. In reality, there is a noticeable degree of "sameness" in the logic of institutional strategies.

· Sameness: Within the same type of strategy, such as arbitrage, the strategic approach is generally similar across institutions.

· Difference: Each institution has its own strategic preferences and unique advantages. Some institutions focus on large-cap assets, uncovering opportunities in these assets, while others prefer smaller assets and excel in asset rotation.

Moreover, concerning the market's capacity limit, arbitrage strategies represent the highest capacity stable income strategy in the market, contingent on overall market liquidity. A rough estimate suggests that the current arbitrage capacity exceeds tens of billions. However, this capacity is not fixed but rather dynamically balanced with liquidity growth, strategy evolution, and market maturity, especially with the rapid expansion of crypto derivative platforms, which will expand the entire arbitrage space.

While there is competition among institutions, the slight differences in strategy, asset coverage, and technical understanding mean that, given the current capacity, returns are not significantly affected.

4.2 Investor Adaptation

Arbitrage strategies, with a mature risk management system, typically carry minimal risk and rarely experience drawdowns. For investors, the main trade-off is the opportunity cost of relative returns: during periods of subdued market trading, arbitrage strategies may yield low returns over an extended period, while during bullish markets, the explosive returns are usually lower than trend-following strategies. Hence, arbitrage strategies are relatively more suitable for conservative investors.

From the perspective of advantages, low volatility and drawdown, making it a safe haven during bear markets, more favored by risk-averse and conservative funds, such as family offices, insurance funds, mutual funds, and high-net-worth individual wealth allocation.

From the perspective of disadvantages, the profit ceiling is not as high as trend-following strategies, with arbitrage strategies averaging 15%-50% annualized return; lower than the profit ceiling of long-only strategies/trend-following strategies (theoretically can be 1x to several times).

For ordinary retail investors, personal arbitrage practice is an investment with "low returns + high learning costs," with an unfavorable risk-reward ratio. It is more advisable to participate indirectly through institutional asset management products.

Funding rate arbitrage is the "deterministic return" of the crypto market, but the gap between retail investors and institutions lies not in cognition but in the disadvantages of "technology, cost, and risk control" being too obvious. Instead of blindly imitating, it is better to choose transparent and compliant institutional arbitrage products and use them as a "ballast" for asset allocation.

Original Article Link

You may also like

Token Cannot Compound, Where Is the Real Investment Opportunity?

The next chapter in the crypto industry will undoubtedly be written by Crypto-empowered Stocks.

February 6th Market Key Intelligence, How Much Did You Miss?

1. On-chain Flows: $508.2M USD inflow to Ethereum today; $390.8M USD outflow from Arbitrum 2. Biggest Gainers/Losers: $HBTC, $AIO 3. Top News: Current Bitcoin weekly RSI oversold signal comparable to June 2022

China's Central Bank and Eight Other Departments' Latest Regulatory Focus: Key Attention to RWA Tokenized Asset Risk


Foreword: Today, the People's Bank of China's website published the "Notice of the People's Bank of China, National Development and Reform Commission, Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, Ministry of Public Security, State Administration for Market Regulation, China Banking and Insurance Regulatory Commission, China Securities Regulatory Commission, State Administration of Foreign Exchange on Further Preventing and Dealing with Risks Related to Virtual Currency and Others (Yinfa [2026] No. 42)", the latest regulatory requirements from the eight departments including the central bank, which are basically consistent with the regulatory requirements of recent years. The main focus of the regulation is on speculative activities such as virtual currency trading, exchanges, ICOs, overseas platform services, and this time, regulatory oversight of RWA has been added, explicitly prohibiting RWA tokenization, stablecoins (especially those pegged to the RMB). The following is the full text:


To the people's governments of all provinces, autonomous regions, and municipalities directly under the Central Government, the Xinjiang Production and Construction Corps:


  Recently, there have been speculative activities related to virtual currency and Real-World Assets (RWA) tokenization, disrupting the economic and financial order and jeopardizing the property security of the people. In order to further prevent and address the risks related to virtual currency and Real-World Assets tokenization, effectively safeguard national security and social stability, in accordance with the "Law of the People's Republic of China on the People's Bank of China," "Law of the People's Republic of China on Commercial Banks," "Securities Law of the People's Republic of China," "Law of the People's Republic of China on Securities Investment Funds," "Law of the People's Republic of China on Futures and Derivatives," "Cybersecurity Law of the People's Republic of China," "Regulations of the People's Republic of China on the Administration of Renminbi," "Regulations on Prevention and Disposal of Illegal Fundraising," "Regulations of the People's Republic of China on Foreign Exchange Administration," "Telecommunications Regulations of the People's Republic of China," and other provisions, after reaching consensus with the Cyberspace Administration of China, the Supreme People's Court, and the Supreme People's Procuratorate, and with the approval of the State Council, the relevant matters are notified as follows:


  I. Clarify the essential attributes of virtual currency, Real-World Assets tokenization, and related business activities


  (I) Virtual currency does not possess the legal status equivalent to fiat currency. Virtual currencies such as Bitcoin, Ether, Tether, etc., have the main characteristics of being issued by non-monetary authorities, using encryption technology and distributed ledger or similar technology, existing in digital form, etc. They do not have legal tender status, should not and cannot be circulated and used as currency in the market.


  The business activities related to virtual currency are classified as illegal financial activities. The exchange of fiat currency and virtual currency within the territory, exchange of virtual currencies, acting as a central counterparty in buying and selling virtual currencies, providing information intermediary and pricing services for virtual currency transactions, token issuance financing, and trading of virtual currency-related financial products, etc., fall under illegal financial activities, such as suspected illegal issuance of token vouchers, unauthorized public issuance of securities, illegal operation of securities and futures business, illegal fundraising, etc., are strictly prohibited across the board and resolutely banned in accordance with the law. Overseas entities and individuals are not allowed to provide virtual currency-related services to domestic entities in any form.


  A stablecoin pegged to a fiat currency indirectly fulfills some functions of the fiat currency in circulation. Without the consent of relevant authorities in accordance with the law and regulations, any domestic or foreign entity or individual is not allowed to issue a RMB-pegged stablecoin overseas.


(II)Tokenization of Real-World Assets refers to the use of encryption technology and distributed ledger or similar technologies to transform ownership rights, income rights, etc., of assets into tokens (tokens) or other interests or bond certificates with token (token) characteristics, and carry out issuance and trading activities.


  Engaging in the tokenization of real-world assets domestically, as well as providing related intermediary, information technology services, etc., which are suspected of illegal issuance of token vouchers, unauthorized public offering of securities, illegal operation of securities and futures business, illegal fundraising, and other illegal financial activities, shall be prohibited; except for relevant business activities carried out with the approval of the competent authorities in accordance with the law and regulations and relying on specific financial infrastructures. Overseas entities and individuals are not allowed to illegally provide services related to the tokenization of real-world assets to domestic entities in any form.


  II. Sound Work Mechanism


  (III) Inter-agency Coordination. The People's Bank of China, together with the National Development and Reform Commission, the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, the Ministry of Public Security, the State Administration for Market Regulation, the China Banking and Insurance Regulatory Commission, the China Securities Regulatory Commission, the State Administration of Foreign Exchange, and other departments, will improve the work mechanism, strengthen coordination with the Cyberspace Administration of China, the Supreme People's Court, and the Supreme People's Procuratorate, coordinate efforts, and overall guide regions to carry out risk prevention and disposal of virtual currency-related illegal financial activities.


  The China Securities Regulatory Commission, together with the National Development and Reform Commission, the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, the Ministry of Public Security, the People's Bank of China, the State Administration for Market Regulation, the China Banking and Insurance Regulatory Commission, the State Administration of Foreign Exchange, and other departments, will improve the work mechanism, strengthen coordination with the Cyberspace Administration of China, the Supreme People's Court, and the Supreme People's Procuratorate, coordinate efforts, and overall guide regions to carry out risk prevention and disposal of illegal financial activities related to the tokenization of real-world assets.


  (IV) Strengthening Local Implementation. The people's governments at the provincial level are overall responsible for the prevention and disposal of risks related to virtual currencies and the tokenization of real-world assets in their respective administrative regions. The specific leading department is the local financial regulatory department, with participation from branches and dispatched institutions of the State Council's financial regulatory department, telecommunications regulators, public security, market supervision, and other departments, in coordination with cyberspace departments, courts, and procuratorates, to improve the normalization of the work mechanism, effectively connect with the relevant work mechanisms of central departments, form a cooperative and coordinated working pattern between central and local governments, effectively prevent and properly handle risks related to virtual currencies and the tokenization of real-world assets, and maintain economic and financial order and social stability.


  III. Strengthened Risk Monitoring, Prevention, and Disposal


  (5) Enhanced Risk Monitoring. The People's Bank of China, China Securities Regulatory Commission, National Development and Reform Commission, Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, Ministry of Public Security, State Administration of Foreign Exchange, Cyberspace Administration of China, and other departments continue to improve monitoring techniques and system support, enhance cross-departmental data analysis and sharing, establish sound information sharing and cross-validation mechanisms, promptly grasp the risk situation of activities related to virtual currency and real-world asset tokenization. Local governments at all levels give full play to the role of local monitoring and early warning mechanisms. Local financial regulatory authorities, together with branches and agencies of the State Council's financial regulatory authorities, as well as departments of cyberspace and public security, ensure effective connection between online monitoring, offline investigation, and fund tracking, efficiently and accurately identify activities related to virtual currency and real-world asset tokenization, promptly share risk information, improve early warning information dissemination, verification, and rapid response mechanisms.


  (6) Strengthened Oversight of Financial Institutions, Intermediaries, and Technology Service Providers. Financial institutions (including non-bank payment institutions) are prohibited from providing account opening, fund transfer, and clearing services for virtual currency-related business activities, issuing and selling financial products related to virtual currency, including virtual currency and related financial products in the scope of collateral, conducting insurance business related to virtual currency, or including virtual currency in the scope of insurance liability. Financial institutions (including non-bank payment institutions) are prohibited from providing custody, clearing, and settlement services for unauthorized real-world asset tokenization-related business and related financial products. Relevant intermediary institutions and information technology service providers are prohibited from providing intermediary, technical, or other services for unauthorized real-world asset tokenization-related businesses and related financial products.


  (7) Enhanced Management of Internet Information Content and Access. Internet enterprises are prohibited from providing online business venues, commercial displays, marketing, advertising, or paid traffic diversion services for virtual currency and real-world asset tokenization-related business activities. Upon discovering clues of illegal activities, they should promptly report to relevant departments and provide technical support and assistance for related investigations and inquiries. Based on the clues transferred by the financial regulatory authorities, the cyberspace administration, telecommunications authorities, and public security departments should promptly close and deal with websites, mobile applications (including mini-programs), and public accounts engaged in virtual currency and real-world asset tokenization-related business activities in accordance with the law.


  (8) Strengthened Entity Registration and Advertisement Management. Market supervision departments strengthen entity registration and management, and enterprise and individual business registrations must not contain terms such as "virtual currency," "virtual asset," "cryptocurrency," "crypto asset," "stablecoin," "real-world asset tokenization," or "RWA" in their names or business scopes. Market supervision departments, together with financial regulatory authorities, legally enhance the supervision of advertisements related to virtual currency and real-world asset tokenization, promptly investigating and handling relevant illegal advertisements.


  (IX) Continued Rectification of Virtual Currency Mining Activities. The National Development and Reform Commission, together with relevant departments, strictly controls virtual currency mining activities, continuously promotes the rectification of virtual currency mining activities. The people's governments of various provinces take overall responsibility for the rectification of "mining" within their respective administrative regions. In accordance with the requirements of the National Development and Reform Commission and other departments in the "Notice on the Rectification of Virtual Currency Mining Activities" (NDRC Energy-saving Building [2021] No. 1283) and the provisions of the "Guidance Catalog for Industrial Structure Adjustment (2024 Edition)," a comprehensive review, investigation, and closure of existing virtual currency mining projects are conducted, new mining projects are strictly prohibited, and mining machine production enterprises are strictly prohibited from providing mining machine sales and other services within the country.


  (X) Severe Crackdown on Related Illegal Financial Activities. Upon discovering clues to illegal financial activities related to virtual currency and the tokenization of real-world assets, local financial regulatory authorities, branches of the State Council's financial regulatory authorities, and other relevant departments promptly investigate, determine, and properly handle the issues in accordance with the law, and seriously hold the relevant entities and individuals legally responsible. Those suspected of crimes are transferred to the judicial authorities for processing according to the law.


 (XI) Severe Crackdown on Related Illegal and Criminal Activities. The Ministry of Public Security, the People's Bank of China, the State Administration for Market Regulation, the China Banking and Insurance Regulatory Commission, the China Securities Regulatory Commission, as well as judicial and procuratorial organs, in accordance with their respective responsibilities, rigorously crack down on illegal and criminal activities related to virtual currency, the tokenization of real-world assets, such as fraud, money laundering, illegal business operations, pyramid schemes, illegal fundraising, and other illegal and criminal activities carried out under the guise of virtual currency, the tokenization of real-world assets, etc.


  (XII) Strengthen Industry Self-discipline. Relevant industry associations should enhance membership management and policy advocacy, based on their own responsibilities, advocate and urge member units to resist illegal financial activities related to virtual currency and the tokenization of real-world assets. Member units that violate regulatory policies and industry self-discipline rules are to be disciplined in accordance with relevant self-regulatory management regulations. By leveraging various industry infrastructure, conduct risk monitoring related to virtual currency, the tokenization of real-world assets, and promptly transfer issue clues to relevant departments.


  IV. Strict Supervision of Domestic Entities Engaging in Overseas Business Activities


(XIII) Without the approval of relevant departments in accordance with the law and regulations, domestic entities and foreign entities controlled by them may not issue virtual currency overseas.


  (XIV) Domestic entities engaging directly or indirectly in overseas external debt-based tokenization of real-world assets, or conducting asset securitization activities abroad based on domestic ownership rights, income rights, etc. (hereinafter referred to as domestic equity), should be strictly regulated in accordance with the principles of "same business, same risk, same rules." The National Development and Reform Commission, the China Securities Regulatory Commission, the State Administration of Foreign Exchange, and other relevant departments regulate it according to their respective responsibilities. For other forms of overseas real-world asset tokenization activities based on domestic equity by domestic entities, the China Securities Regulatory Commission, together with relevant departments, supervise according to their division of responsibilities. Without the consent and filing of relevant departments, no unit or individual may engage in the above-mentioned business.


  (15) Overseas subsidiaries and branches of domestic financial institutions providing Real World Asset Tokenization-related services overseas shall do so legally and prudently. They shall have professional personnel and systems in place to effectively mitigate business risks, strictly implement customer onboarding, suitability management, anti-money laundering requirements, and incorporate them into the domestic financial institutions' compliance and risk management system. Intermediaries and information technology service providers offering Real World Asset Tokenization services abroad based on domestic equity or conducting Real World Asset Tokenization business in the form of overseas debt for domestic entities directly or indirectly venturing abroad must strictly comply with relevant laws and regulations. They should establish and improve relevant compliance and internal control systems in accordance with relevant normative requirements, strengthen business and risk control, and report the business developments to the relevant regulatory authorities for approval or filing.


  V. Strengthen Organizational Implementation


  (16) Strengthen organizational leadership and overall coordination. All departments and regions should attach great importance to the prevention of risks related to virtual currencies and Real World Asset Tokenization, strengthen organizational leadership, clarify work responsibilities, form a long-term effective working mechanism with centralized coordination, local implementation, and shared responsibilities, maintain high pressure, dynamically monitor risks, effectively prevent and mitigate risks in an orderly and efficient manner, legally protect the property security of the people, and make every effort to maintain economic and financial order and social stability.


  (17) Widely carry out publicity and education. All departments, regions, and industry associations should make full use of various media and other communication channels to disseminate information through legal and policy interpretation, analysis of typical cases, and education on investment risks, etc. They should promote the illegality and harm of virtual currencies and Real World Asset Tokenization-related businesses and their manifestations, fully alert to potential risks and hidden dangers, and enhance public awareness and identification capabilities for risk prevention.


  VI. Legal Responsibility


  (18) Engaging in illegal financial activities related to virtual currencies and Real World Asset Tokenization in violation of this notice, as well as providing services for virtual currencies and Real World Asset Tokenization-related businesses, shall be punished in accordance with relevant regulations. If it constitutes a crime, criminal liability shall be pursued according to the law. For domestic entities and individuals who knowingly or should have known that overseas entities illegally provided virtual currency or Real World Asset Tokenization-related services to domestic entities and still assisted them, relevant responsibilities shall be pursued according to the law. If it constitutes a crime, criminal liability shall be pursued according to the law.


  (19) If any unit or individual invests in virtual currencies, Real World Asset Tokens, and related financial products against public order and good customs, the relevant civil legal actions shall be invalid, and any resulting losses shall be borne by them. If there are suspicions of disrupting financial order and jeopardizing financial security, the relevant departments shall deal with them according to the law.


  This notice shall enter into force upon the date of its issuance. The People's Bank of China and ten other departments' "Notice on Further Preventing and Dealing with the Risks of Virtual Currency Trading Speculation" (Yinfa [2021] No. 237) is hereby repealed.


Former Partner's Perspective on Multicoin: Kyle's Exit, But the Game He Left Behind Just Getting Started

Kyle knew his game, so he decided to focus on playing the game he was good at and interested in.

Why Bitcoin Is Falling Now: The Real Reasons Behind BTC's Crash & WEEX's Smart Profit Playbook

Bitcoin's ongoing crash explained: Discover the 5 hidden triggers behind BTC's plunge & how WEEX's Auto Earn and Trade to Earn strategies help traders profit from crypto market volatility.

Wall Street's Hottest Trades See Exodus

This time there is no single triggering factor, but rather market anxiety about asset valuation, with many already skeptical of these valuations being too high, leading to investors choosing to retreat almost simultaneously.

Popular coins

Latest Crypto News

Read more